Quantcast
Channel: Brightest Bulb In the Box: Beauty for Critical Minds
Viewing all 298 articles
Browse latest View live

The FDA Rolls Its Eyes with Exasperation at Triclosan in Anti-Bacterial Products

$
0
0
In August, we talked about triclosan, an anti-bacterial agent, and its potential not-so-pleasant environmental effects. The FDA has now proposed a new rule requiring manufacturers to prove that products containing triclosan are more effective than simple soap and water.

As a quick reminder, triclosan works by binding to the enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (ENR) and increasing its affinity for a co-enzyme. When ENR is clogged up, the bacteria is unable to create cell membranes. Since cell membranes are kinda important, the bacteria subsequently dies.

However, the fact that there is a mechanism by which triclosan is capable of killing bacteria does not indicate that triclosan provides a meaningful benefit over safe, environmentally-friendly alternatives. According to the FDA website, "For... consumer products [other than toothpaste, the] FDA has not received evidence that the triclosan provides an extra benefit to health. At this time, the agency does not have evidence that triclosan in antibacterial soaps and body washes provides any benefit over washing with regular soap and water."

Source: http://www.fda.gov/forconsumers/consumerupdates/ucm205999.htm
Dr. Sandra Kweder, deputy director of the Office of New Drugs in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, added, "Our goal is, if a company is making a claim that something is antibacterial and in this case promoting the concept that consumers who use these products can prevent the spread of germs, then there ought to be data behind that." (A-fucking-men!)

The new rule would also require that manufacturers to provide additional safety data in order for triclosan to be considered "generally recognized as safe for use". Most concerning is the possibility that antibacterial agents like triclosan will contribute to bacterial resistance. When subpopulations of a larger bacterial population survive a dose of antibiotics, the remaining organisms are more likely to have antibacterial-resistant genes. Since these genes are highly likely to exist on plasmids, small DNA molecules that are separate from the cell's chromosomal DNA, these genes can actually be passed from bacteria to bacteria in a process called horizontal gene transfer. This means that if a single bacterial species develops antibacterial resistance, it can actually be passed from species to species.

As antibacterial agents become more commonly used, there is increased selective pressure on bacterial species. Thus, resistance evolves to become more and more common. If your hospital is relying on antibacterials like triclosan to keep patients safe, but every Tom, Dick, and Harry is using triclosan in their hand soap, this is a big concern. (The proposed rule would exempt hand sanitizers, hand wipes, and antibacterial soaps that are used in health care settings.)

The FDA is currently waiting as both consumers and experts weigh in on their triclosan-related opinions. In the meantime, don't forget to wash your hands.

Review: Alchimia Apothecary "Choose Your Own Adventure" Perfume Oils

$
0
0
I have millions of weaknesses. Sometimes I take too long to do water changes on my fish tank. Right now, my bed is filled with bags of Milano cookies. My boyfriend has to be responsible for the bills because I would never get them out on time on my own. I'm one of those "buy more socks instead of doing the laundry" people.

One of my weaknesses is hubris.

I've mostly skipped the indie perfume scene. I care way more about having 500 purple eyeshadow shades than I do about having a smell that no one else is wearing. There is also something a bit heart-wrenching about shelling out $15 for a tiny, 5 ml jar of something that you may or may not like. Finally... I find the idea of perfume oils to be fundamentally less appealing than a traditional perfume. I would rather have my whole body smell lightly florally than to have my wrists smell incredibly intense.

However, when I saw that Alchimia Apothecary was having a "buy two get one free" sale, I made an impulse buy. There are a few indie perfume companies that will do custom perfumes, but most of them cost more money than the business's usual wares. All of Alchimia Apothecary's scents are $15, including custom orders. With the buy-two-get-one-free deal, that was $30 for 0.51 fl oz, or $58.82 per fluid ounce-- a substantial discount.

Regrettably, I didn't even spend very long planning my scents. It was a spontaneous, "I wonder how these smells would go together."


Everything came incredibly quickly. Even though I ordered custom-made products, my order shipped out a mere three days after I submitted it. My perfumes came in cute little baggies with orange bubble wrap, which was thematic at the time (I got these babies in October).

Here's how my scents turned out:


Peach Blend

What I asked for: "Peach, Peppermint, Pear, Freesia (with Peach as the basenote/dominant scent)."


This is definitely my favorite of three by a huge margin. I find this scent to be both unexpected and really pleasant. I don't smell pear or freesia. I'm sure that they do affect the scent, but they are so totally in the background that I can't even pick them out when I consciously look for those aromas.

When I first apply the oil, I get a really heavy peppermint smell with a soft peach and, as it fades, I'm left with a stronger peach and lighter peppermint. Peach is a smell that really reminds me of summer and peppermint is a smell that really reminds me of winter. The combination is so surprising and lovely that when I apply this I find myself sitting around and smelling my wrists.

Lime Blend

What I asked for: "Lime, Huckleberry, Hibiscus, Ginger."


Unfortunately, the second two scents that I ordered were less successful. My lime blend smelled kinda like lime-flavored Gatorade. You can tell that there is both citrus-y and something sweeter in there, but the combination isn't ideal. It smells like something your kids would want to drink, but you wouldn't want to give to them. It's the Capri Sun of perfume.

Lilac Blend

What I asked for: "Lilac, Milk and Honey, Sea Spray, Rose (with Lilac as the basenote)."


I find that the lilac, the sea spray, and the rose in this perfume are all really distinct. You can look for them and smell them. Sadly, when you put them all together, it smells overwhelmingly of laundry detergent. Admittedly, it smells like really classy laundry detergent. I would buy this laundry detergent and feel really self-satisfied because of how fucking fancy my chores were. But, sadly, that doesn't change the fact that I don't really want to smell like soap.

The problems with these perfumes are so obviously my fault it's a little hilarious. In particular, the lilac fragrance smells exactly like what I asked for... it just turns out that that is super soapy. If I make future indie perfume orders, I'm definitely leaving the scent-mixing up to the professionals.

At $15 for 5 ml/0.17 fl oz, the Alchima Apothecary Perfume Oils run in at $88.23 per fluid ounce. That's definitely more expensive, ounce per ounce, than a regular perfume. For comparison, Viktor and Rolfe Flowerbomb is $61.76 per fluid ounce. Since they are smellier than traditional perfumes, however, you may find yourself using less product.

Review: Urban Decay Naked Basics (Revisited)

$
0
0
Unless you are best hipster ever and have been reading my blog since literally day 1, you probably started reading in 2013. I started blogging on December 11, 2012 with the express purpose of keeping track of what I got from subscription boxes like Birchbox and Ipsy. I kind of assumed that no one would read my blog. I kept track of the things that I personally found to be interesting and important, but that's it. Everything else just kind of fell out once I had an arena to express my (numerous) opinions.

One of my first product reviews (my third product review, if you want to get technical) was for Urban Decay's Naked Basics palette. This review happened almost exactly a year ago (if you want, you can read it here). And let's be real. It wasn't the most helpful review. I still struggle with photos, but my photos at the time were substantially awful-er. I also didn't provide a lot of information and didn't show you how the shadows actually looked on my face.

A few days ago, a friend of mine requested some eyeshadow inspiration using Naked Basics. A re-visit seemed like the perfect way to close out the year: it's a demonstration of my growth as a makeup blogger in 2013.


Naked Basics was released in late 2012 as a response to pleas by eyeshadow addicts who were begging for an all-matte Naked palette after its two glitter-bomb predecessors. Even in their "all matte" palette, Urban Decay eyeshadow formulators couldn't help throwing in a non-matte shade because, fuck it, they're Urban Decay and they've got to be true to themselves.

The color scheme of Naked Basics is pretty bland, but in a versatile kind of way. I kind of think of Naked Basics as the eyeshadow equivalent of a potato. You could live your life without potatoes, but they really come in handy. On their own, though, potatoes are not super interesting. They are great supporting characters-- who doesn't love big hunks of potato in their soup?!-- but the thing about your food that is interesting is not going to be the potato itself. The potato just helps your soup (or whatever you made) be complete. Likewise, with Naked Basics, the thing about your makeup that will have a "wow" factor is probably not going to be your eyeshadow. You can blend it beautifully and it will look awesome, but there has to be something else in your look to create real visual interest. Combined with the rest of your makeup, Naked Basics can be used really effectively to create a beautiful look.


Naked Basics is half the size of a full-size Naked Palette, containing six 0.05 eyeshadows. The colors lean on the light side, which is nice for all of us who find that we use up a palette's designated highlight at a much faster rate than the other shadows. It's less helpful, though if your goal is to create as many diverse looks using the palette as possible, since the three lightest shades are relatively similar.


The palette contains:

Venus, which is a creamy satin shade with a hint of a frosty finish. It's the color of whipped cream with a ton of vanilla poured in. (Everything else is matte.)

Foxy is a soft, creamy yellow that is reminiscent of manila envelopes.

Walk of Shame is a pale, pink-ish beige.

Naked 2 is a very soft, brown-leaning taupe.

Faint is a medium-dark brown.

Crave is a black.


Every single shade in this palette is creamy and richly pigmented.

Over the past year, this palette has been my staple for "professional" makeup. I wore these shadows on every job interview that I went on. Since someone did, in fact, hire me, I can only assume they didn't shoot me in the foot too badly. Clearly I can attribute my new job to Urban Decay and not, like, my resume or some bullshit like that. 

For this post, I did three looks using Naked Basics, each of which had a different level of intensity:


At $27 for 0.3 oz of product, Naked Basics is pretty medium-priced, ringing in at $90 per ounce.

Basically, given the quality of these eyeshadows, I would recommend this palette to anyone who looks at it and says, "That looks like something I would like to wear. I would get a lot of use out of that." If this palette is a yawn for you, don't buy it. There are tons of neutral palettes you can wear to work that have a bit more pizazz. If you like how it looks, though, you will love it.

Mathmatical Navelgazing: 2013 In Blogging

$
0
0

As a part of my "Oh my god, it's not 2013 anymore, what the hell" review,  I decided to go through and determine what it is I've felt compelled to write about all year by categorizing and graphing the content from this blog. 

To do this, I divided my posts into fourteen general categories. The categories included:

Beauty Bullshit posts: These posts explained the lack of science behind inflated product claims.
Example post- Beauty Bullshit: Fat Girl Slim

Beauty Myths posts: These posts were similar to Beauty Bullshit posts, but they looked at claims that were not being promoted by specific products or companies. Rather, they were simply crappy claims being passed around as fact.
Example post- Beauty Myths: Should You Be Worried About Mineral Oil?

Comparisons: These posts put products to the test, determining their efficacy in head-to-head comparisons. 
Example post- Mega-Comparison: Eyeshadow Primers

Drugstore Dupes to the Test: These posts looked at alleged "dupes", comparing them to their more expensive counterparts.
Example post- Drugstore Dupes to the Test: Smashbox Photo-Finish Primer vs. Monistat Anti-Chafing Gel

History Posts: These posts looked at the history of cosmetics.
Example post- Chic Antique: the Braids of the Vestal Virgins

How Does it Work? Posts: These posts looked at products that actually do work and explained the mechanism.
Example post- How Does it Work? Deodorant and Anti-Antiperspirant

Math Posts: These included calculations of value.
Example post- Birchbox vs. Ipsy: A One-Year Analysis by the Numbers

Miscellaneous Posts: If I couldn't categorize it elsewhere, I stuck it here.
Example post- Why I Don't Plan on Buying Anything from Michelle Phan's Em Cosmetics

My Experiments: These included my various empirical-esque projects.
Example post- What Is Living on Robyn's Makeup Brushes: A Horror Story

Random Sample Grab Bag Posts: My perfume reviews.
Example post- Random Sample Grab Bag: Perfume Reviews Part 4

Reviews: Self-explanatory.
Example post- Review: Stila Magnificent Metals Foil Finish Eyeshadow in Dusty Rose, Metallic Emerald, and Comex Gold

Science (Misc.) Posts: Any science-related post that didn't get stuck elsewhere was categorized here.
Example post- The Environmental Ominousness of Polyethylene Cleansers

Subscription Box Reviews: Reviews of Birchbox, Ipsy, Wantable, and Julep.
Example post- Wantable December 2013 Review

Tutorials: Also self-explanatory
Example post- Terrible Tutorials: How to Cover Your Acne and Scarring

Obviously, some of these categories overlap, but I went ahead and used my best judgement in categorization.

Sorted by month, my data looks like this:





Amalgamated and put into graph form, you get this:



I can also further consolidate this data by adding together Beauty Bullshits + Beauty Myths + How Does It Work? Posts + Math + My Experiments + Miscellaneous Science into one big category called "Empiricism". Comparisons + Drugstore Dupes to the Test can become "Comparisons (all)". Random Sample Grab Bags + Reviews + Subscription Box Reviews becomes "Reviews (all)". Finally, History + Miscellaneous + Tutorials becomes "Misc. (all)" After that, you get something like this:


With 267 total posts in 2013, I averaged a post every 1.37 days, which isn't awful, even if it falls short of my "one post per day" goal.

Cheers to 2014!


P.S. Although you are always welcome to leave content suggestions in the comment section, this post would be a particularly relevant time to do so. 

P.P.S. One of my 2014 blogging resolutions is to set up an email account associated with this blog so that y'all have more ways to contact me.

Review: Laura Mercier Lip Glacé in Bare Pink and Baby Doll

$
0
0
The days you want to make an impression are not the days you want to wear Laura Mercier. If someone says, "In America, even teenage girls are overly made-up. And when you are overly made-up, you send out the message that you are overly sexual, that you want to be visible to attract men", well, you just can't trust their opinion on red lipstick or purple eyeshadow.

Laura Mercier's products are solid, but boring. Sometimes, though, that's what you want. If you find yourself in that boat, congrats. I have the lipgloss for you!


I have two 0.1oz mini Lip Glacés, but the full size lipglosses are 0.15oz. (If these look like someone smooshed them, though, that's why!) The product comes in 25 shades, nearly all of which are some variation of light to medium pink.


The product applies with a doe-foot applicator. The texture isn't sticky, but it's on the thick side. It feels like something that might harden on your lips, as if it were paint that is perpetually wet.

Do you use my manicures to track how long I have been procrastinating on a post? Because you totally should.

Bare Pink is a peachy, warm-leaning baby pink.

Baby Doll is a cooler, darker bubblegum pink with a hint of iridescent rainbow glitter.

Bare Pink on left, Baby Doll on right

On my face, Bare Pink "nudes out" some of my lip color. It's so sheer and insubstantial that it works as a "not-really-a-nude-lip-but-we'll-pretend-because-we-have-weird-fears" color for even the most nude-lip averse.

Laura Mercier Bare Pink on Human Face

Baby Doll is a pretty conventional light pink gloss.

Laura Mercier Baby Doll on Human Face

Overall, the glosses aren't sticky and are perfectly nice colors. There's nothing wrong with them. And it's good to have something un-fuck-up-able in your collection. For example, I wore Baby Doll today after I lazed around too much in the morning and had to get slap on my makeup in five minutes. Could it be Laura Mercier? Sure! Could it be a million other brands with near-identical formulas? Absolutely!

Laura Mercier Lip Glacés retail for $24 for 0.15oz, or $160 per ounce. This definitely leans on the pricey side-- Buxom Lip Glosses retail for $19 for 0.15oz ($126.67 per ounce) and Dior Addict Gloss is $29.50 for 0.21 oz ($140.48 per ounce).

Cosmetics Company History: Shiseido

$
0
0
In the year 578, Abdul Muttalib, the grandfather of the Islamic profit Muhammad, died. The Byzantine Emperor, Julius II, also passed away. (He was succeeded by his general, Tiberius.) It was 11 years before the first historical reference to toilet paper. It was the time of both King Arthur and Beowolf. And, in the year 578, in the city of Osaka, a construction company called Kongo Gumi was founded. It would go on to become the world's oldest continuously operating company, working out of Japan for over 1,400 years. (Sadly, it was liquidated in 2006.)
Clearly, Japan is supportive of its industry. As a result, they have some of the most long-lived companies in the world. As of 2008, Japan housed 3,146 of the 5,586 companies that are over 200 years old worldwide (that's about 56%). Japan has a full 21,000 companies that are over 100 years old. In comparison to Kongo Gumi, Shiseido is a mere flash in the pan. However, founded in 1872, Shiseido has been continuously operating for more than 140 years, growing from a tiny organization into the fourth largest cosmetics company in the world. To the best of my research, they are also the world's oldest cosmetics company.

Shiseido Pharmacy was founded in 1872  by Arinobu Fukuhara, the former head pharmacist for the Japanese Imperial Navy. (A sense of scale for those of us who are Americans: that means that Shiseido has existed during the presidency of every US president since Ulysses S. Grant. 1872 is also the year that Brigham Young was arrested for polygamy, that Susan B. Anthony illegally cast the first vote by a woman, and that Yellowstone was established as a national park.)

Arinobu Fukuhara
Source: http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx/?file=%2f2012%2f8%2f16%2flifeliving%2f11851556

Earlier in 1872, a fire burned down large segments of the Ginza district of Tokyo. In response, the Japanese government designated the area as "a model of modernization". Giant streets and stylish (but fireproof!) buildings were built throughout the Ginza district. Companies moved in quickly, building beautiful window displays for shoppers. Thus, it is no coincidence that Shiseido was started up in the fashionable Ginza district; it would have been seen as a demonstration of the company's innovative mission. Starting in the mid-1850s, there was a heavy divide in Japanese cosmetic use, with some women opting for the traditional rice powder and hair lacquer, whereas others took the more Western approach of using lipstick, blush, and flesh-toned powder. Shiseido implicitly marketed towards the latter type of customer.

Ginza cerca 1910
Source: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5287/5278569009_f2516bb30a_o.jpg

According to the company, "The origin of the name Shiseido comes from a classic Chinese text, the 'Yi Jing' ('Book of Changes'), which reads, 'Praise the virtues of the great Earth, which nurtures new life and brings forth new values.'"

Fukuhara aspired to create a new system for dispensing medicine in Japan, where pharmacies were separate from hospitals, akin to Western pharmacies. His inspiration didn't stop there; Fukuhara was so enamored with the soda foundations on his trip to the United States that he added a soda foundation to his pharmacy. Shiseido also introduced ice cream to Japan for the first time. The Shiseido Ice Cream Parlour branched off in 1928 and is still in business today (under the name Shiseido Parlour).

Someone TripAdvisor Photos of Shiseido Parlour in Ginza
I WANT TO EAT ALL OF THESE THINGS
Source: http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/01/36/88/55/shiseido-parlour-ginza.jpg

Despite these side projects, Shiseido continued to produce and sell innovative personal care products. In 1888, they introduced Japan's first toothpaste, Fukuhara Sanitary Toothpaste. Although it was much more expensive than the commonly used tooth powders (by about tenfold), it was considered to be less messy. As a result, it garnered sizable sales.

When the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 to 1895 and the Russo-Japanese War of 1904 to 1905 began to restrict cosmetics imports, Shiseido's focus began to shift. In 1897, the company introduced Eudermine, a softening lotion. This was its first true "cosmetic" product. As a nod to the West, Eudermine is derived from Greek (meaning "good skin") rather than Japanese. (Worth noting: although Eudermine is still available for sale, the formula is not the same as the 1897 version. Additionally, with alcohol as the second ingredient in the modern formulation, it's probably not living up to its product claims.)

Modern Eudermine Ad
(Mostly makes me want whatever that lipstick is.)
Source: http://www.vitativshop.com/media/eudermine%20cover.jpg

Cosmetic imports to Japan were also obstructed by regulation. Cosmetic-precipitated lead poisoning was a very real risk for Kabuki performers. In response, the Japanese government required stringent testing for cosmetics products. Consequentially, most Western cosmetics companies didn't bother to sell in Japan, opting for markets with more lax safety standards. An established company like Shiseido not only had a recognizable name to the citizens of Tokyo, they had the capital to pay for cosmetics development. As a result, they were embraced as one of the few competitors in the Japanese market.

Arinobu Fukuhara was succeeded as head of Shiseido by his third son, Shinzo Fukuhara, in 1915. Shinzo's experience in a pharmaceutical maker's cosmetics factory gave him the knowledge needed to develop new product formulas. As a photographer, his ties to the art community would inspire Shiseido's marketing campaigns. (He would also become the company's first president went it went public in 1927.) Arinobu's products like the Rainbow Face Powder, a seven-colored pressed powder for balancing out complexions that was introduced in 1917, set Shiseido apart, as white-face powders were the norm in Japan at the time

Rainbow Face Powder cerca 1917
Source: http://www.asia.shiseido.com/about/story/origins/img/story_11.jpg
 
In 1923, Shiseido began to spread, operating as a chain store, where each store had set prices. They also began to distribute, selling their products though other retailers. They were listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange in 1927. They began to grow incredibly rapidly. Even World War II only resulted in a brief period of re-organization for the company, returning to the Toyko Stock Exchange four years after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In 1957, Shiseido began international operations and manufacturing. By the 1960s, they were selling in both the United States and Europe. Although Western sales lagged at first, Shiseido began to offer exclusive products to high-end department stores, which quickly turned out to be a popular choice, earning $75 million annually by the mid-1980s.

Shiseido Counter
Source: http://nordo4ka.blogspot.com/2013/01/Lacquer-Rouge-Shiseido-Metro-Paragon.html

In the 1990s, the Japanese government began to eliminate cosmetics-related regulations, triggering an influx of cheap, foreign brands on the Japanese market. However, Shiseido's huge marketshare of Japanese cosmetics and their decision to begin offering more cost-effective products to challenge new competitors means that Shiseido is still the largest cosmetics company in Japan by a very comfortable margin.

Shiseido owns a variety of other popular brands, including NARS Cosmetics and Bare Escentuals (Bare Minerals), although the majority of the company's sales still do take place in Japan

Review: Milani Color Statement Lipstick in High Voltage

$
0
0
Milani is a brand I haven't explored much, possibly because their name reminds me of cookies, which are even more distracting than lipstick. Still, when a friend of mine suggested that I was throwing my life away by skipping the Milani Color Statement lipsticks, I managed to pick one up. (Definitely bought some Peppermint Milanos too, though. Gotta have priorities.)


Although I really like this lipstick, it has one huge, non-subtle, and potentially overwhelming flaw: IT STINKS. This is seriously the most cloyingly sweet, terrible smelling makeup product that I have ever used. It smells like watermelon Jolly Ranchers, but, like, concentrated. If you made an essential oil out of watermelon Jolly Ranchers and then stuck your nose in the bottle, it might smell like this.

I am an adult (pink promise) and I would really prefer that my makeup smell like something other than leftover Halloween candy.


Otherwise, this lipstick is the bee's knees. It's fully opaque with a heavily glossy finish. Unlike some glossy lipsticks, though, this stays in place. There's no worry that it will migrate up to your nose without careful supervision.

High Voltage is a warm, vibrant red that feels like the red lipstick a flamingo might wear.


This definitely passed the "four hours and a meal" test, although the bulk of its staying power seemed more like a stain than the glossy lipstick you get immediately after application. Still, it lasts ludicrously long. One of my weird nighttime habits is, after removing my makeup and brushing my teeth, occasionally I'll apply a super bright lipstick color before going to bed. (I HAVE A LOT OF LIPSTICKS AND THEY ALL NEED LOVE.) I did that with High Voltage... and the next morning it looked like I'd made out with a parrot and/or had just applied a lip stain. Since it's definitely not drying, I think that this is a really good option for anyone who struggles with lipstick lasting through the day.

Milani High Voltage When Applied
Milani High Voltage Four Hours and a Meal Later

If you have no sense of smell, this might be one of the best lipsticks available in the drugstore. If you are very sensitive to odors, I would probably recommend skipping it (unless you adore the smell of Jolly Ranchers. Seriously, it's uncanny.). For anyone in the middle, I think that the many awesome qualities that this lipstick possesses outweighs the fact that it reeks, especially given that the smell dissipates  relatively quickly after application. I'm just peeved that no one in product development spoke up and said, "Hey, maybe we shouldn't make this smell like the breath of a seven-year-old at a birthday party!"

The Milani Color Statement lipsticks retail for $5.49 for 0.14 ounces, putting them at a very reasonable $39.21 per ounce.

My Top 13 Products of 2013

$
0
0
There are two days that make sense for a "Best of the Year" post: New Years Eve and New Year's Day. Unfortunately, I am a procrastinator. If you're being generous, you could call me a prioritizer. However, that train of thought is only consistent if my priorities are:
  1. Actual Important Stuff
  2. Watching Arrested Development in My Pajamas
  3. Not-Quite-So-Important Stuff That I Still Made a Commitment To Do
For my "top products of 2013", I am not looking a products that were released in 2013 (since I'm not Temptalia so I don't try shit right when it comes out) and I'm not looking at products that I tried for the first time in 2013 (since thanks to my previously-acknowledged procrastination, that method would require a fair bit of reflection). Rather, for simplicity's sake, I'm looking at my favorite products that I reviewed in 2013. These are the products that, in my opinion, deliver on quality, cost-per-ounce, and excitement value. In no particular order:

1. Sleek i-Divine Acid Palette

Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: It feels like a cop-out to say "This is awesome because it is cheap", but I'm going to say it anyways. At $9.99 for 0.36 ounces, this is the most cost-effective neon eyeshadow palette on the market. It's vibrant, pigmented, and inexpensive as fuck.

My eyeshadow skills are seriously SO MUCH BETTER, you guys.

2. Paul and Joe Color Powder in Inseparables

Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: This is a creamsicle orange blush that feels like a wearable coral. It gives the perfect natural finish without being overly or insufficiently pigmented. And, seriously, don't pretend you don't see how beautiful that packaging is. I could stare at it all day.


3. Urban Decay Revolution Lipstick in Rapture

 Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: Rapture is the ideal mix of "this is totally a natural shade that you could wear while doing adult things like your taxes" and "WOOO THERE IS PURPLE". Add in their lovely sheen and excellent lasting power and it's hard to find fault. This is one of the only makeup products that I keep in my purse in case I urgently need lipstick for some reason.



4. TheBalm Time Bomb Concealer in Lighter than Light

 Original Review: Here



Why It's Awesome: Not only does theBalm's color range do justice to those of us who are fair-skinned, this product has ample coverage and a lightweight formula that makes it suitable for both undereye circles and blemishes. As an added bonus, this huge pot will last forever!

5. Tarte Amazonian Clay Waterproof Brow Mousse in Taupe

Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: This cream formula adds definition to my brows without looking penciled on. Its easy to use and to build up to any desired level of intensity.


6. Sigma Beauty Crème de Couture Eyeshadow Palette

 Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: It's hard not to get excited about such vibrant, pigmented pastels. This palette is completely unlike anything else. Beyond that, it's significant in size! At $32 for 0.85oz, I paid a mere $37.65 per ounce of product here.


7. Illamasqua Cream Pigment in Hollow

 Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: Hollow is so easy to use and blend that it makes contouring virtually foolproof. Even flat-faces like myself can fake cheekbones with its easily blendable formula and natural-looking, shadow-mimicking color. It's the holy grail of contouring for pale skin.


8. NYX Studio Liquid Liner in Extreme Blue

 Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: Not only is this color electric, this eyeliner is all-but-permanent. This will last through tears, face-rubbing, and exercise, all while being the color of an aquarium crayfish.


9. My Pretty Zombie "Drugs Like Me" Blush in MDMA

 Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: MDMA is a natural, glowing pink with a huge kick of golden shimmer. It's the kind of universally flattering shade that will remind you of springtime and/or let you plaster your love of springtime on your face.


10. LORAC Pro Palette

 Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: The LORAC Pro Palette is, by a large margin, the best neutral palette I have ever tried. The wide range of shades and the 50/50 mix of mattes and shimmers makes this versatile as fuck. The shadows are so buttery and smooth that they blend like nobody's business-- making it a great "I AM IN A HUGE RUSH BUT AM TRYING TO PRETEND THAT I HAD ENOUGH TIME TO PUT ON EYESHADOW" palette. These eyeshadows are my standard for what quality eyeshadow should be like.


11. Tarte Amazonian Clay 12-Hour Full Coverage Foundation

Original Review: Here (And the tutorial that got more people's attention here.)


Why It's Awesome: This foundation has almost unparalleled coverage and a natural-looking finish. It also lasts effectively and has a decent color-range for fair skin. Plus, at $22.35 per ounce, it is super reasonably priced.

12. Shiro Curaga Mineral Highlight

 Original Review: Here


Why It's Awesome: This product is a recipe for cheekbones that go "Pow". You + Brush + Curaga Highligher = Everyone will think you are going to poke their eye out with your face bones.


13. Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy

Original Review: Here

Pixie Epoxy giving a boost to Fyrinnae's Are You My Mummy?, Glitterboi, and Pteranodon.

Why It's Awesome: This product is a miracle for loose eyeshadows, keeping them on your face, enhancing their color, and bringing out characteristics that would otherwise be hidden.

Wantable January 2014 Review

$
0
0
I'm so fucking annoyed at this truly horrendous box that I have been procrastinating on dealing with it at all. At $36 a month, Wantable needs to be consistently stellar in order to be worth anyone's time. That means that a mediocre box is a "yeah, you probably don't want to subscribe to Wantable" indicator. But a crap box... Jesus Fuck. A crap box is rage-inducing.

And this box is worse than a crap box. 

Here's what I got this month:


Sorme Get a Brow Gel in Fawn (full size at 0.4oz), retail value $10.10


I feel the need to quickly address Wantable's totally bullshit "retail prices". Wantable claims that the list price for this product is $16; that's just not true. The list price is $12 and it isn't difficult to find this product for less (for example, it's sold here for $10.10.) Given that this is being sold pretty much exclusively at discount online retailers, I can only assume that this is a discontinued product.


With that said, this is probably the best product in the (AWFUL) box. The color is darker than what I usually use, but it's definitely wearable.


I don't think that the "brow gel" format is very effective in terms of coloring your brows in general because it's imprecise (especially on thinner brows) and ends up being really messy, but the product looks perfectly nice when applied with a brush.



Michael Marcus Foundation Brush (travel size), retail value $20(?)


Wantable is claiming that this product has a $20 value, but that's iffy as fuck given that I can't find the travel size version of this brush for sale anywhere.

Although I normally don't pass up foundation brushes, this is a really, really bad foundation brush. The bristles are so floppy that it's difficult to use. This makes it feel really cheap.

La Bella Donna Lip Pencil in Scarlet (full size at 0.04oz), retail value $14.95


Again, Wantable's supposed retail price is misleading at best. These lip pencils may have original retailed for $22 (the value that Wantable claims), but they are currently available for much less, coming in closer to $14.95.


Although it's labeled as a lip pencil, it is definitely a lip liner and it's fundamentally indistinguishable from any of the other numerous lip liners that Wantable has thrown in my direction over the past few months. It's sort of a light, strawberry-colored red.


Okay, so, so far, three very unimpressive products, but nothing to throw a fit about. The fourth product is where my anger about this box is clearly justified:

Michael Marcus Lip Gloss Wheel in Scrumptious (full size at 0.35 oz), retail value $0.00 (Wantable lists the retail value as $39.50)


Okay, so, getting a lipgloss wheel is, in and of itself, pretty annoying, because I have lipgloss listed as a "dislike" on my Wantable profile, and, in theory, we are never sent product that we say that we "dislike".

But that's not why I'm so mad.

Look at this picture. Look at this product.

It is completely covered in mold.


This is not a factory defect. Look at that poop-brown color. There are indents and then mold coming out over the indents. This is mold. This is lots of mold.

I decided to look into what the fuck happened here. First, I looked up this product. It's not only not available for sale, the only traces of it that I can find are on discount beauty retailers (because these are ugly colors and no one wanted to buy it). I can't find a price, but it clearly hasn't retailed for Wantable's stated retail value ($39.50) in years. In other words, it is clearly expired.

Next, I wanted to see why Wantable sent me a lipgloss in the first place, so I started digging through my Wantable preferences. It became immediately clear that Wantable had kindly decided to re-set my preferences. The things that I said I "loved" were still listed as "loved", but the things I said I "disliked" were all listed as "liked".

God fucking damnit

Total Box Value: $45.05

Wearing the brow gel and lip liner as a lip pencil
So, to summarize, Wantable sent me one product that is fine, that I would probably use if I owned it (but I don't really care about it), two products that I would not use, and one product that was awful to the point of being ridiculous. To add insult to injury, they didn't even bother sending me any samples this month.

I haven't contacted Wantable's customer service yet, but I have had good luck with them in the past. I will keep you updated about how they decide to resolve the problem.

If for some reason, this review convinced you to join Wantable because you love moldy products or something (?), I suppose you can use my referral link by clicking here. If this review increased your desire to join Wantable, though, we clearly have very different priorities.

Review: Stila In the Moment Eyeshadow Palette

$
0
0
Fun fact: purple is the best color (After all, who doesn't love a good non-spectral hue?). This is objective. You can trust me. Sometimes I talk about science on this blog.

Fun fact #2: neutrals are the staple of all eyeshadows. An eyeshadow collection without neutrals is like a kitchen without salt. It's possible for forego them, but it becomes much more difficult to create an appealing product. Even if you walk around looking like the Sugarpill Cosmetics facebook page all the time, you're gonna need a black and a white and a gold.

The Stila in the Moment Eyeshadow Palette is a mix of purples and neutrals. In theory, it should be the best thing ever.


Unfortunately, packaging-wise, this product feels really cheap. I'm not sure who thought, "Lavender cardboard! That will entice people to purchase this product! And, for good measure, we'll put metallic hearts on the front, just to drive home the fact that this is totally for adults." That person, however, should probably not have a job in product design.


Instead of having a mirror on the inside cover of this palette, Stila decided to include a vague platitude by the company's global director of education Sarah Lucero that reads, "Cherish the beauty of the moment." (Without the capitalization, of course. Stila's computers do not have shift keys.)

When I was in sixth grade, we started each class with a discussion of a famous quote. Towards the end of the year, my teacher caved and began to let class members make up their own quotes to discuss. Because sixth graders are not very deep, every single quote was either directly plagiarized (I remember someone pretending that they made up the quote "All roads lead to Rome".), an obvious derivative of an otherwise famous quote (E.g. "You only get fifteen minutes of fame, so you better not waste it!"), or so uninspired that they have completely slipped from my memory. I feel like Sarah Lucero would have felt right at home in my sixth grade class.

Personally, I don't use the mirrors on eyeshadow palettes, so I don't really care that it's absent, but I know it's really, really important to some people, because I guess they always do their makeup on the bus or something. If you care, then, know that there is no mirror.


The top row of shadows are sort of the more purple-y shades. They are as follows:

Instinct is a very intense frosty, cream that leans towards being a pale pink or a pinkish beige.

Impulse is a pale lilac, also with a frosty finish.

Glance is a rich, cool, medium-toned purple. This one has more of a satin finish.

Improvise is a dark plum filled with lighter purple hunks of glitter.

Catalyst is a black with purple glitter.

All five of these shades are really beautiful. Glance is maybe a bit less pigmented than I might wish, which is a bummer, since it is such a pretty color, but it works fine as long as you pair it with a top-notch primer.



The bottom row is filled with neutral colors:

Desire is a matte, pale peach. It is a shadow that tends to get a layer of grime and oil on top that ruins the pigmentation and has to be scraped off after a few uses. It's also not very pigmented even when it's clean!

Wonder is a pink-leaning tan with a satin finish.

Spontaneous is a shimmery copper.

Whim is a shimmery warm brown. I don't find this shade to be as pigmented as I would like.

Captivate is a cool, frosty brown filled with metallic glitter. Again, this shade is a little bit disappointing. It seems that the opacity decreases way too quickly as you blend the damn thing.


The palette also contains a full-size Smudge Stick eyeliner in Tetra. Smudge Sticks usually retail for $20 for 0.1oz. I personally would not pay $20 for a Stila Smudge Stick, but it's something to keep in mind if you have been lusting after the Tetra eyeliner.


The Smudge Sticks do twist up, which is nice. Tetra is very smooth and feels nice during application, but, given the fact that it is literally called a "Smudge Stick", I actually don't think it smudges particularly well.


Tetra is an eggplant shade with purple glitter.


Here are some looks I've done using this palette:





Overall, I really like this palette, although it's a bummer that some of the colors are not as saturated and beautiful as I would have preferred. In particular, Desire, Whim, and Captivate were not up to par. There are so many fantastic neutral palettes out there that I hold neutrals to a really high standard. I think it's particularly egregious when a brown eyeshadow misses the mark since I kind of feel like we should have brown eyeshadow figured out by now. I also personally don't have a lot of use for the Smudge Stick in Tetra, as I pretty consistently lean towards crisper lines for my eyeliner save for tightlining (and you can't exactly tightline with purple glitter!). And, of course, the packaging is awful. Still, most of the colors are beautifully pigmented, the crappier shades can be built up as needed, and the shades chosen more generally are excellent. I definitely get a lot of use out of this palette, flaws aside.

Stila's In the Moment Eyeshadow Palette retails for $39 for 0.49oz, putting it at a totally acceptable $79.59 per ounce. (The bonus Smudge Stick is an additional 0.01oz.)

What the Hell Is Going On With the Tarte Cheek Stains?

$
0
0
Jessica asks, "You should do a review of how much some Tarte products cost per ounce now that they changed their packaging to half or third the size and kept the prices the same."

ASK AND YE SHALL RECEIVE. Unfortunately, I presume (since it was brought up), that I'm expected to take a tone of indignant outrage, and that's just not where I come out.

Here's why people are upset: The old tarte cheek stains retailed for $30 for 1 ounce of product, putting them at $30 per ounce. The new tarte cheek stains retail at $30 for 0.5 ounces, putting them at $60 per ounce. This isn't totally out-of-the-blue; Tarte's new releases have been 0.5 ounces since 2012. What's new is that all of Tarte's cream blushes are now in the half-an-ounce version.

Source: https://www.facebook.com/tartecosmetics

Prima facie, it actually makes a lot of sense to be displeased. Tarte cut the size of their products in half but didn't change the price. You get less product for your money.

Is It a Bad Deal?

Underlying this unhappiness is the assumption that you're getting a bad deal. Are you getting a bad deal? Well, let's go ahead and compare that to other cream blush sticks on the market, from least expensive to most expensive per ounce:

Maybelline Master Glaze Blush Sticks are $8.99 for 0.24 ounces ($37.46 per ounce). 
Josie Maran Argan Color Sticks are $22 for 0.55 ounces ($40 per ounce).
NYX Stick Blushes are $6 for 0.13 ounces ($46.15 per ounce). 
Revlon Babysticks are $5.99 for 0.1 ounces ($59.90 per ounce).
Be a Bombshell's the One Sticks are $16 for 0.26 ounces ($61.54 per ounce).
NARS the Multiples are $39 for 0.5 ounces ($78 per ounce).
Clinique Blushwear Creamsticks are $21 for 0.21 ounces ($100 per ounce).

If the old Tarte cheek stains were on that list, they would be the cheapest ones on there, less expensive than Maybelline, NYX, and Revlon. The new price is right smack in the middle: more expensive than the drugstore brands but less expensive than higher-end brands like NARS.

The only real outliers on that list are Josie Maran, which is priced low, and Clinique, which is priced high. My prediction is that Josie Maran will adjust in future, raising their prices a few bucks to be in line with the pricing of other brands, and that the Clinique Blushwear sticks will just sell badly.

In other words, $30 for 0.5 ounces of Tarte Cheek Stain isn't a bad deal, and is pretty much exactly what you would expect to pay if not for a cognitive bias called the anchoring effect, where the first piece of information ("$30 for an ounce of product") is used to make subsequent judgements ("therefore $30 for half an ounce of product is unfair"). 

Is There a Benefit to the Smaller Sizes?

Okay, so we've established that these new prices aren't ridiculous in comparison to other stick blushes out there. There's still another argument against the change that makes sense to me. The argument is thus: The actual "makeup" part of makeup is not incredibly expensive to make. Tarte is probably not saving a shitload of money by halving the sizes, but they are being assholes to their customers. There is no benefit to decreasing the product size, so they should just suck it up.
The thing is, as someone who has purchased the Tarte Cheek Stains quite a while ago, I think that there is a benefit to reducing the product sizes. 
 
 
 
I dug this out of the trash can by my vanity especially for you guys. This is a Tarte Cheek Stain that I purchased something like three or four years ago. As you can see, it looks disgusting. There is a layer of film over it and the oil has separated out of the product. (It actually looks less gross right now than it did when I originally found it still lurking in my collection-- when I opened it up, a heap of red goo poured right into my lap.) The pigment is all mucked up, meaning it is concentrated in certain sections of the product.

This isn't Tarte's fault. This is my fault for hoarding products and keeping them long after they have expired. Even people who know better, like me, keep shit for way too long and it gets yucky. And then, of course, you end up with negative feelings about Tarte because you had to pour your greasy bacteria-tube into the trash.

What's more, I bet there's an even grosser problem that they are trying to counteract: mold. My guess is that this change was precipitated by a series of complaints like, "How dare you sell me a cream product that doesn't last a full decade without molding! But also, don't put any new preservatives in it because something something cancer!"

Are You Getting Less Value?

Fine, you may say. But I still get less product out of my blush! I want bang for my buck!

In reality, I don't think you are getting any fewer uses out of your products. I decided to do a quick test. 

I didn't want to put an expired product on my face for obvious reasons, so I checked about how much product I use in one application of cream blush is using my Stila Convertible Color and my fancy scale. (I only took one measurement, and you might cake on more blush than I do, so do keep in mind that my methods are inaccurate as fuck.) One application of cream blush came out to 0.009 grams (0.0003 ounces).

That means that one ounce of product (the amount in the original Tarte blushes) works out to something like 3333 application in a tube. THAT IS RIDICULOUS. THERE IS NO WAY IT WON'T MOLD IF YOU KEEP IT THAT LONG. If I applied the original one ounce tubes once per day, every day, with no waste (I admittedly waste a lot on those Tarte blushes because I always feel like they need to be cleaned off), it would take me something like 9 years to totally use it up.

I don't know how else to say this. There is no reason that this product needs to be a humungous one ounce tube. It's just extra landfill fodder.

Well, Then, Shouldn't They Just Decrease the Price?

Didn't we already establish that the biggest costs in cosmetics are not the products themselves? I would agree that PR-wise, it would have been an effective gesture of goodwill to decrease the prices. However, let's say that the extra 0.5 ounces costs $2 to manufacture (I totally pulled that number out of my ass, sorry). No one demanding a lower price is going to be satisfied if Tarte adjusts the prices from $30 to $28.  Adjusting the prices significantly (e.g. bumping them down to $22) would cut into employee's salaries, the company's ability to develop new products, the company's marketing budget, and so forth.

You can still be grumpy, but I feel like Tarte didn't have a lot of choices save building a time machine and traveling back to when these cheek stains were being released and saying, "STOP, FORMER SELVES! THAT IS TOO BIG!"

What About the LipSurgences?

People are weirdly also claiming that the Tarte LipSurgences have also decreased in size, but this is demonstrably false.

There are people complaining, for example, that these lip products are a third of the size. I can only assume that these people are confusing ounces vs. grams and then decimals... simultaneously. The Tarte LipSurgences are and always have been 0.1 ounces, which is the same as 3 grams. They have not changed. I took a photo of a LipSurgence that I bought quite a while ago, in case my word isn't gold.

Reading in at 3g/0.10oz
Sephora agrees
And so does the Tarte website.

Another part of the confusion is that Tarte released a new product called the LipSurgence Power Pigment, which is $24 for 0.04 ounces. Is that ridiculously expensive at $600 per ounce? Yes. Am I going to buy it at that price? FUCK NO. But it doesn't change the price of the other lip tints, which are still $24 for 0.1 ounces ($240 per ounce).

How Did Tarte Handle This Whole Thing?

Finally, it is worth noting that one of the reasons people are so enraged is because Tarte's PR team totally botched this whole thing. First, they made no announcements, and just kind of plopped a smaller product on the shelves. Then, their facebook response was 800 different kinds of vague:


I think being really explicit about what they are doing would have gone over a lot better. (E.g. Saying, "People were keeping them so long that the products would start molding, since no product can last forever." Except, like, nicer than that.) Likewise, they are so vague that it is reading as deceptive. For example, they're glossing over the fact that, for a period of time, they were selling Tarte Cheek Stains in BOTH one ounce and one half ounce sizes. Consequentially, people are thinking, "Well, I bought a Tarte Cheek Tint in 2013 and it was one ounce. That means that they are lying." Well, they did have 0.5 ounce products starting in 2012, but they also had 1 ounce products. I think being frank and clear would go over much better than what they are doing right now.

Crappy facebook responses are forgivable. The really big problem in the response came in the form of obviously fake Sephora reviews. They are, in fact, so obviously fake that the tiny part of my brain that wants to be a conspiracy theorist thinks that they might have been written by someone trying to make Tarte look bad. Because... seriously. Seriously. Are we expected to believe that these are real reviews?

I am borrowing someone's computer, and screenshots on this computer look awful for some reason.

These are made by individuals with only one review, who joined Sephora.com the day that they made that one, glowing comment about how Tarte is so amazing that we should be grateful, and, if you need icing for that cake, many of the reviews are by usernames that are just random numbers and letters.

WHAT?!



Tarte needs to tell their marketing department to shut the fuck up, because they are turning what could have been a totally reasonable change into something really embarrassing for the company. And if, by some bizarre turn of events, it is not Tarte employees posting those blatantly fake reviews, they should probably ask Sephora to remove them since they do not leave a good taste in consumers' mouths.

In summary, I don't think that Tarte's product size changes are insidious. I do think that they are totally fucking up the PR.

Julep January 2014 Review

$
0
0
I live in Washington state, so my Julep box doesn't need to travel very far to reach me. I got this buttloads of time ago. Julep wasn't tardy; I am.

The theme of this box was "The Boudoir Collection", which I only feel the need to point out because clearly the Julep creative team and I are shopping at different lingerie stores. (The last bra I bought was this hot pink and yellow monstrosity by Mimi Holliday. I think Julep has to release a leopard print nail polish before they can truly claim to be underwear-themed.) BUT HEY, I can still appreciate a good lavender satin.


As has been my pattern, I chose to upgrade my box. And, as has been my pattern, I feel that I should note that I wouldn't have upgraded if I didn't have the points to do so for free.

My upgrade included nine nail polishes, quick-dry nail polish drops, and a cuticle softener.

Nail Polish


The nine nail polishes in the collection include:

Mae is a cool, dusty lavender color. It's described as a "Satin" but it's nothing like any satin that I've ever seen. It reminds me of the Illamasqua rubber-finish nail polishes more than anything.

Farrah is the grayer, shimmery version of Mae.

Noelle is a shimmery, soft taupe.

Annemarie is sort of a "mauve meets milk chocolate". This is definitely the least romantic color in the collection.

Hope is a snowy white.

Hannah is a muted sage.

Mona is a dark, smokey gray.

Abigail is a shimmery scallop-pink.

Margot is a full-on glitter gold!

Here are my messy nails, featuring Farrah and Mae:

Julep Farrah and Mae
Ta Da! Quick Dry Drops

I was kind of expecting the quick dry drops to be really boring, but I was pleasantly surprised. They don't seem to do their job any better than a drugstore product, but they smell fucking awesome. The inclusion of rosewood oil,  lavender oil, and ylang ylang oil means that this product smells like an aromatherapy shop.


Shockingly, it's actually not even very expensive. This product is a full fluid ounce, twice the size of a standard nail polish bottle. (Given the teeny weeny sizes of Julep nail polishes, this is particularly shocking.) This product is $14.00 for non-subscribers and $11.20 for Mavens. For comparison, the Essie Quick-E Drying drops are $14.95 for 0.5 fluid ounces, or $29.90 per fluid ounce. That's more than two and half times the Maven price, ounce per ounce.

Vanish Cuticle Softener and Remover

So, I hear we're supposed to care about our cuticles for some reason. (This is why you should never listen to my nail polish advice. I have no idea what I am talking about.) I heard on the grapevine that if you paint your nails over your cuticles, the polish doesn't last as long and also... is ugly.


This product is sort of a milky substance that you can drop on your nails and it will, in theory, let you kind of moosh your cuticles out of the way. As someone who habitually does my nails in the bathtub, I didn't see any difference between this product and regular old water.

Overall, I'm pretty happy with my Julep box. It could have been a little bit more exciting, but the nail polishes and the quick dry drops are both solid and I'll definitely use them. The cuticle softener, if I'm being totally honest, will probably just live a sad, lonely life under my bathroom sink.

If you have suddenly decided that subscribing to Julep is an awesome idea, you are always welcome to use my referral link by clicking here. The code FREEBOX or FREECOLOR will get you your first box for free.

Review: Anastasia Beverly Hills Hypercolor Brow and Hair Color in Ultra-Violet

$
0
0
Ombre hair may come and go. (Alternatively, ombre hair may stay permanently in the summers of 2011 and 2012.)

Purple eyebrows, though? Purple eyebrows never go out of style. 


The Anastasia Beverly Hills Hypercolor Brow and Hair Colors are essentially hair chalk in fancy, rainbow packages. A quick peek through other reviews shows that most people are pretty much using these suckers for hair chalk and hair chalk only.

Personally, I'm pretty firmly in the "I have too much fucking hair to bother with hair chalk" court... but this brow powder has been a permanent resident on my eyebrows on days when I feel like looking too wacky to go outside.


The product contains only slightly more than an Urban Decay eyeshadow single (0.05 ounces vs. 0.07 ounces), but it is packaged in a wide and flat container, presumably to make it look like there is a little more product then there actually is. This means that if you are using it for hair chalk, even if you have a lot less hair than I do, you're probably going to use it up pretty darn fast.


The powder itself is super pigmented and it pretty easily covers eyebrow hair when applied with an angled brush. No fancy tricks needed.

I've used a lot of hair chalks on my eyebrows (don't pretend you are surprised!), and this is definitely the most effective, least powdery product that I have tried.


Here's how it looks on my face:

My hair was inspired by Claudia from the Babysitter's Club, because I am an adult.

At $12.50 for 0.07 ounces of product, this brow color isn't exactly cheap at $178.57 per ounce. As a result, I really wouldn't recommend it for hair chalk. But, if you are planning on coloring your eyebrows more than, say, a single time, I think that the quality of this product for brows is higher than the competition. It's much easier to use than eyeshadow and you don't end up with a quarter cup of powdered waste, like you do with other hair chalks.

Well, Y'all Asked For More Ways to Contact Me...

$
0
0
At the beginning of the new year, I asked for suggestions on ways to improve the blog. Two of the overwhelming requests were to get a damn facebook page because it is 2014 and what am I doing with my life, and to get an email for the blog so you can send me suggestions in super secret. (I also got lots of other requests that we are going to conveniently ignore for the time being.)

Those ones, though. Those ones I did.

If you would like to contact me, you are free to send me an email at brightestbulbinthebox@gmail.com with post suggestions, requests to guest post, information about things you want to send me for free, or clever limericks. (You are also always welcome to post in the comments, even if it is off-topic.)

You can also find me on facebook here. Some people are subtle about requesting facebook likes... but I'm not going to be subtle. Please like my facebook page.

Drugstore Dupes to the Test: Urban Decay 24/7 Pencil Eyeliner in Perversion vs. Milani Liquid Eye in Black

$
0
0
Urban Decay's 24/7 Glide-On Eye Pencils are sort of a cult product, to the extent that anything from a gigantic brand like Urban Decay can be "cult". (They're "cult" the way that Rocky Horror Picture Show is "cult": most of us have tried them or at least heard of them, even if they're not sitting on our DVD player/vanity right now... but they people who use them often really like them. Urban Decay doesn't make you eat a banana out of someone's legs the first time you use it, though, which is a nice bonus.)

One common suggested dupe is the Milani Liquid Eye (formerly called Liquif'Eye) liners. In particular, it's said that the Liquid Eye in black is a dupe for Urban Decay's Perversion, their blackest black color.


I didn't have very high hopes for this dupe partially because I think people are easily seduced by packaging (and the pencil version of this product is packaged in the same black wood as Perversion), partially because I accidentally picked up the twist-up version of this product, and partially because I saw a few people saying that the color was "in between Perversion and Zero" (the crappier Urban Decay black), which, to me, says, "this isn't a dupe but I REALLY WANT IT TO BE".


I will say: having a twist-up liner, to me, is vastly preferable to having to sharpen stuff yourself.

Unfortunately, the color on the twist-up definitely wasn't "in between" Zero and Perversion: it was just different from them. While Zero has a fuzzy "this is mostly black, I guess" appearance and Perversion has a "I just drew on my hand in charcoal" look, Milani almost has a greenish slate feel, in comparison.

Less unfortunately, I can say that the texture feels completely identical to the Urban Decay eyeliners. It's very soft and creamy, but not so soft that it feels like it's going to break on you.

Next, I went ahead and tested the longevity. Here's how the liners looked when they were applied:

From left to right: UD Zero, Milani Liquid Eye, UD Perversion

Here's how they looked four hours later. Zero is definitely struggling, but Milani and Perversion haven't really changed:

From left to right: UD Zero, Milani Liquid Eye, UD Perversion

Eight hours after application, both Milani and Perversion pretty much haven't budged:

From left to right: UD Zero, Milani Liquid Eye, UD Perversion

After my longevity test, I took a wet hand and rubbed back and forth vigorously to see how much they smudged. All three were disadvantaged by their introduction to water, but Milani was definitely the smudge-y-est. Silver lining? Even Milani did pretty well on this test.

From top to bottom: UD Perversion, Milani Liquid Eye, UD Zero

Finally, I wanted to see if there was any practical difference between them, since a slight change in blackness and being less resistant to rubbing might not make a difference in your everyday experience of the products.

I usually use Perversion for tightlining, so that's what I did here.

Here is my (very tired early morning) face with no tightlining or mascara:


And here is how the final product looks, with both tighlining and mascara (this is my 'creepy doll' face):

Perversion on the left, Milani on the right.

As you can see, not a huge visual disparity, but Perversion is definitely noticeably blacker, even when you're just tightlining.

So, at this point, it seems like maybe this isn't a good dupe, but it's a less expensive alternative that will fill the same niche in your makeup routine.

And... it would appear that way until you look at the price. 

Milani Liquid Eyes are $6.09 for 0.01oz, putting them at $609 per ounce (this is true for both the twist-up and the pencil, by the way). Urban Decay 24/7 Eyeliner Pencils are $19 for 0.04oz, putting them at a less expensive $475 per ounce.

If you can find these pencils for less than $4.75, they are less expensive, ounce per ounce, than Urban Decay. Otherwise, you're paying more money for what is, frankly, a crappier product. Perversion is blacker and lasts better when exposed to water and vigorous rubbing. In order to justify costing over $600 an ounce, Milani Liquid Eyes would have to be better than the Urban Decay 24/7 Liners. They just aren't. If the size wasn't so ridiculously small, I could recommend them (although not as a dupe). But, in less you don't plan on using the product more than a few times, it just makes more sense to splurge and pick up Urban Decay.

Ipsy January 2014 Review

$
0
0
Ipsy definitely has its disappointing months, but it usually sustains interest based on the fact that they really do send out primarily makeup-related items. Like, you get things that are purple or glittery or glossy. This month, they decided to go the skincare/haircare/boring shit route. It wasn't a good change.


I also really didn't like the bag itself. The sky blue with pictures of miscellaneous, faceless body care products looks like something that would be in a tween magazine ad or a book about your first period. The bag (not to mention the inclusion of Proactiv) kind of makes me feel like I am too old for this subscription service... and I'm not particularly old. I am of the age where I could conceivably wear body glitter and maybe even get away with it. To me, it seems a little unwise for Ipsy to make their aesthetic as young-looking at they have, since I would wager that most of their subscribers are over the age of 14.


Here is what I received: 

Epice Purifying Exfoliant (1 ounce), approximate retail value $10


I don't have a lot to say about this exfoliant. It exfoliates. It does its job. Sadly, it is a polyethylene cleaner and I'm kind of trying to stay away from polyethylene cleansers for environmental reasons. It thoroughly unremarkable, really. I can't think of any reason you would feel compelled to purchase it.

Briogeo Don't Despair, Repair Deep Conditioning Mask (1 fl oz), approximate retail value $4.95


This is another totally unremarkable product. It is a conditioner. It conditions your hair. It vaguely smells like coconut, but it doesn't seem to have any coconut-y ingredients in it.


The one ounce sample was a single use for me because I have so much hair that it's silly. I'm definitely not willing to pay $5 every time I condition my hair, so this is out of my conditioner-related price range. I need to buy conditioner by the jug.

Proactiv+ Mark Fading Pads (4 pads), approximate retail value $10.93


Unlike a large number of acne-ridden former teenagers, I have not actually tried Proactiv. These products are formulated with both glycolic acid and salicylic acid in pretty high concentrations (5% and 2%, retrospectively). Those are both effective ingredients at fading post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation from acne, so these probably would work if you used them regularly. (Worth noting: My skin can definitely handle them, but these would be a nightmare for sensitive skin since those chemical exfoliators are so strong.) Unfortunately, my problems with this product are twofold: Firstly, I'm trying to, as best as I can, stick to an alcohol-free skincare routine. Secondly, Proactiv is kind of a shitty company. (More info from the not-the-most-reliable-but-still-easily-accessible Jezebel by clicking here.)

Even if I did adore the product, these are no longer available for sale individually (I based my approximate retail value on their previous pricing), so I would have to sign up for a whole big Proactiv kit to get them. No thank you!

Mica Beauty Tinted Lip Balm in Natural (0.09oz), approximate retail value $18.75


I really wanted to like this product, since it is actually a very pretty color. 'Natural' is a lovely "my lips but better" shade: an opaque dusty rose.


Unfortunately, I think that the atrocious texture makes the product completely unwearable. This "lip balm" is not moisturizing at all. It feels like I am applying grease paint to my lips.


It looks beautiful, but there are plenty of products that look beautiful and have less distracting, uncomfortable formulations.

Yaby Natural Finish Liquid Foundation in Buff (full size at 0.272 fl oz), retail value $13.55


It probably says more about my incredibly low standards for beauty box foundations that I looked at this and was impressed that it was in the same genre as my skin color. (The Yaby concealer I got from Ipsy in May of 2013 was so far off that it was almost comical.) It was also very wise of Ipsy to choose a sheer foundation, rather than one with more coverage, since more people can kind of pretend that it suits their skintone.Unfortunately, I can't even pretend. On me, this foundation is very orange. It simultaneously provides almost no coverage, so I just look like someone who is covered in acne and also has an orange face. It's really not a good look. It also has a very weird texture. It's a silicone-based foundation, which is a category with which I have mixed results, but this, to me, feel really greasy and strange.

Swatch of a foundation that actually fits my skintone (Wet'n'Wild's Coverall in Fair) on top, Yaby Buff on bottom.

There are definitely things about this product that I think are smart (for example, the tube at the end can be pulled out and flipped around, letting you squeeze in other foundations to get a better color match), but it doesn't have any of the qualities that I like in a foundation and it doesn't match my skintone. I'm sure this foundation would work for someone, but it sure as hell doesn't work for me.

What's more, this product is actually pretty ridiculously pricey: $49.81 per fluid ounce.

Total Box Value: $58.18

Although the monetary value on this bag was totally fine, I didn't like a single thing that I got. I feel like this bag kind of highlights the thing about subscription services that doesn't quite work. Even if a service did really listen to your customization preferences, there is no way for you to list every little thing you care about. There's no way for you to say, "No, when I say that I am fair, I mean that I am REALLY VERY FAIR" (and, of course, I am sure that problem is even worse on the darker skinned part of the spectrum). There's no way to list the random environmental causes you care about or that you don't want XYZ ingredient in your skincare.

I actually don't think I am particularly picky when it comes to beauty products. I don't gush with love over most products, but there aren't very many products that I reject on their face. Save for the tinted lip balm, these are all things that I could have told you were terrible choices for me without even trying them. For people who are legitimately picky, I feel like subscription boxes are just a bad choice in general. However, I generally do like getting subscription boxes, so it's just a bummer when your dislikes collide in such an conspicuous way.

May next month be better...

If you feel somehow compelled to join Ipsy despite my negative review, you are more than welcome to use my referral link by clicking here.

Review: Wet'n'Wild Coverall Cream Foundation in 815 Fair

$
0
0
The biggest benefit of choosing a mid-range or high end foundation isn't, in my opinion, the quality of the product. It's the quantity of your options. If your foundation budget is $10 flat, you only have so many choices. Thus, if you want a foundation that checks X, Y, and Z box, it can be really difficult to find something appropriate. (My boxes: I need a cool-toned, full-coverage foundation that is suitably pale. When drugstore brands are trying to appeal to as many people as possible, it can be a serious challenge to find something I like!) If you have specific tastes and you're willing to pay heftier sums, you're just gonna find more shit that ticks your boxes.

The corollary of this, though, is that, occasionally, you might stumble upon a cheap foundation holy grail. There's nothing wrong with drugstore foundations, it's just that people who are uncommon foundation shades who want to be able to cake the shit out of their faces with foundation can't find the right product. (If you're a moderately tan white person who is neutral toned and likes medium coverage foundation, I can only assume you have so many choices that it's silly.)

For me, Wet'n'Wild Coverall Cream Foundation in 815 Fair is that drugstore "Oh My God, I Can't Even Believe Such A Fabulous Product Exists in This Price Range" foundation.


I picked this up on a total whim. My thought process was essentially, "Wet'n'Wild is a brand I like and this color looks like it might not be atrocious on me."

The packaging isn't anything special, but, at $3.99, if you're expecting elaborate and beautiful packaging, you just don't have realistic expectations. It comes in a little squeezy tube, which is a really good option because it allows you to keep your makeup sanitary. Observe that they did this at a $3.99 pricepoint. Take note, Estee Lauder and your fucking glass jars without a pump.


The product is essentially perfect in terms of a color match on me. It's neutral-leaning-cool in tone and it's the perfect shade of pale. Unfortunately, it looks like one color up is dramatically darker, so it's definitely luck that it matches me so well. It also doesn't go very dark, so it's not going to be helpful in that direction. Additionally, it doesn't get any paler than my skintone, so if you think you are lighter than I am, you still probably want to skip this one.


The coverage is described on the package as "medium-to-full coverage". I think that description is apt. If you don't take any steps to build up the foundation, you're going to get medium coverage. But I had no problems layering that shit on until my acne and scarring were totally obscured. In a lot of situations, that's actually going to be better than a foundation like Kat Von D or Estee Lauder Double Wear (review pending on that latter one, I know), where you apply it to your face and immediately it is full-as-fuck coverage. To me, building up coverage on the areas where you need it is less work that trying to bring life into an overly concealed face via contouring, blush, satin finishing powders, and all that jazz.

This has become my go-to "I'm running late for work" foundation because it's such a no-brainer without sacrificing any coverage.

I traditionally haven't done face-pictures for foundations, but I'm going to try to be better about including those. Y'all have all already seen my scarred-up face, so there's no harm in showing it again.

I debated whether I should show the BEST that I can make the foundation look (meaning that I use fancy primers, extra concealer, and a finishing powder), or whether I should just show what it looks like when I put the foundation on my bare face. I opted for the latter on this review, but if you have strong feelings either way, you may want to chime in.

Here's my face with nothing on it:

The coloring is wonky on this picture, sorry.
And here is my face with nothing on it save for Wet'n'Wild's Coverall in Fair:


I like this foundation a lot, and I say that as someone who owns really fucking fancy foundations. I would strongly recommend you give it a try if you think you might have a good color match. And, if you don't,  Wet'n'Wild's Coverall foundation is a mere $3.99 for an ounce of product, putting it, of course, at $3.99 per ounce. 

They're Called Sebaceous Filaments, and They're Supposed To Be There!

$
0
0
Sometimes, marketing companies are kind of dicks.

One of the crappiest beauty-related stunts that they have pulled is convincing people that normal and permanent parts of their skin are somehow pathological and need to be removed.

This is my nose:


As you can see, it is covered in little dots. Those dots are not blackheads; they're sebaceous filaments. Why do so many people think they're blackheads? Well, in their commercials, companies like Proactiv say, "BLACKHEADS SUCK, ERMEGERD" and then zoom in on pictures of sebaceous filaments. Then, normal people take the obvious implication of the commercial as fact, and conflate sebaceous filaments and blackheads when they talk about their face... and everyone ends up confused.

Again, sometimes, marketing companies are kind of dicks.

So, what are sebaceous filaments? You may remember that your skin has sebaceous glands, which emit a waxy goop called sebum. Sebum keeps your skin and hair soft and waterproof, both of which are appreciated. Sebaceous glands are typically found in areas with at least a little bit of hair. They connect to that hair follicle.

In areas with "wispy" hairs and larger sebaceous glands, you may find something that has been sexily described as a "a loose, porous mass of horny detritus". The outer-most section of the hair follicle, called the acro-infundibulum, sloughs off cells. This mixes with sebum and miscellaneous bacteria around the hair itself, forming "a skeleton of 10-30 horny cell layers" and a bunch of other gunk.

This is a natural process associated with sebum production. Thanks, puberty.

Most of you will probably be unsurprised to hear that sebaceous filaments are typically found around the center of your face and on your nose.

I went ahead and used a Biore pore strip, because I can only assume that you want to see my sebaceous filaments close-up. Although people frequently suggest that Biore pore strips remove blackheads, they actually remove sebaceous filaments. To use one, you wash your face, put the strip on your wet nose, wait for it to dry, and rip it off. (It's not very comfortable.)



Obviously, you can see that the pore strip ripped out a fair number of my sebaceous filaments. Does that mean they are effective? Well, it depends on what you mean by effective. Sebaceous filaments can be ripped out, sure. But they are quickly refilled by the sebaceous gland. They are an irreversible part of your basic skin structure.

(Worth noting, for those of you who truly hate these buggers: anecdotal evidence indicates that salicylic acid may reduce the appearance of sebaceous filaments, but, with no proven topical method of reducing sebum production, it's a crapshoot at best. I promise, though, your nose looks fine.)

Birchbox January 2014 Review

$
0
0
Birchbox has a reputation for being a little bit bland. It was a surprise, then, to open my box and see so many different colors and shapes. Seriously, look at this. It's what Birchbox ads are made of:

VISUALLY APPEALING.
Were the products amazing? Eh. Still, say what you will about my Birchbox this month... It wasn't bland.

Here is what I got:

Nail Rock Manicure Glitter in Red Glitter (full size at 0.34 fl oz for the polish, 0.18oz for the glitter), retail value $7.00


I was really excited about getting this product because... well, glitter and nail polish. I also really like the color-- if you need a reference, it's very similar to the red that McDonald's prints on their ketchup packets.

As you are all probably aware, I am not particularly good at doing my nails. I am also impatient as fuck. That means that if I try to do any sort of nail art the day that I paint my nails, everything ends in tragedy. My strategy, then, is to do my nails at night, go to bed (so I am literally 100% sure that my nails are dry when I try something fancy), and then do whatever miscellaneous nail art I wanted to do. (And we're using the word "nail art" pretty loosely here.)

When I applied the nail polish itself, I was already pretty not-blown-away by the formula. It's very thin and watery. It feels like a quick-dry nail polish... but, like, worse. Then, I could not get it opaque for the life of me. I did four coats of the stuff before getting frustrated and giving up. I figured I would do a half-moon manicure and just cover the tips of my nails with glitter, and no one would be the wiser. I went to bed.

When I woke up the next day, my nails looked like this:


That is absolutely unacceptable. I spent the rest of my day watching as little flakes of nail polish drifted off my fingers.

Beauty Rock is not a brand that I have had success with in general. The Nail Rock Nail Wraps were terrible... and I tried out (and didn't review. Let me know if you are aching for one!) the Eye Rock Designer Liners and they possibly the worst product I have ever used. I just wasn't expecting this to be so bad because nail polish and glitter isn't exactly a complicated product concept.

Serge Normant Meta Revive Dry Conditioner (1.2 oz), approximate retail value $9.38


Dry shampoo is not the same thing as regular shampoo. It just doesn't serve the same function. If you have gunk in your hair, dry shampoo won't get it out. Thus, I am, in theory, willing to kind of cut dry conditioner a break if it doesn't actually add back in oils or (for some conditioners) coat your hair in silicone, which is how conditioner does its job.

However, a few glances through the ingredient list of the Serge Normant Dry Conditioner and I am baffled at how they can call it conditioner. In fact, based on its ingredients, it looks exactly like a dry shampoo. Ingredients like Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate are included to absorb oil. I don't understand how that fits with the concept of a dry conditioner. A few ingredients are kind of conditioner-y (e.g. Butylene Glycol, a humectant), but those ingredients are commonly used in dry shampoo, as well.


Looking the Birchbox description of what ingredients are supposedly making this product function is even more baffling. Birchbox states, "Argan oil makes hair soft and supple while fortifying the cuticle to help hair shine. Cornstarch absorbs oil without weighing down your mane."

Okay, let's go ahead and look at the actual ingredients of this product, for a minute: Butane, Propane, SD Alcohol 40-B, Ethyl Trisiloxane, Aluminum Starch Octenylsuccinate, Butylene Glycol, Diisopropyl Adipate, Quaternium-91, Cetrimonium Methosulfate, Cetearyl Alcohol, Fragrance, Hydrolyzed Wheat Protein PG-Propyl Silanetriol, Polyquaternium-59, Butylene Glycol, Argania Spinosa Kernel Oil, Disteardimonium Hectorite.

See where argan oil ("Argania Spinosa Kernel Oil") is located on that list? Four ingredients after "fragrance"? (For those of you not already aware, the order of ingredients is indicative of the amount of the ingredient in the product. The product contains more of the ingredients at the beginning of the list.)

See where cornstarch is located? Yeah, me neither. It's not even on the ingredients list.

In other words: bull-fucking-shit, Birchbox.

Now, let's go ahead and look at what this product actually did to my hair. Here is my hair pre-dry conditioner:


Here is my hair post-dry conditioner.


It did absolutely nothing. It doesn't work and theory and it doesn't work in practice.

100% Pure Fruit Pigmented Mascara in Black Tea (0.1oz), approximate retail value $7.50


I had really low expectations for this product. My last 100% Pure Product, a green apple body cream, smelled like Jolly Ranchers and had no redeeming qualities. Both the brand and the product seem gimmicky to me. ("While picking blackberries in her garden, 100% Pure founder Susie Wang noticed that the fruit stained her skin a beautiful deep red color—and had an epiphany: All-natural pigments could mimic the brilliance of harsh artificial dyes, minus the irritating side effects." Okay, naturalistic fallacy.)


To my surprise, though, this mascara is actually super, super awesome. I really like mascaras that are effortless. To me, this is the perfect, effortless mascara. It looks as natural as a black mascara can look and it gives lots of length without causing clumpy spider legs.

Before mascara:


After mascara:


One more view. Before mascara:


After mascara:


I definitely would consider purchasing a full size of this product. The only caveat I have is that it doesn't smell amazing. The "black tea" scent is reminiscent of blueberry cough syrup.

ZENMED Gentle Cleansing Cream (0.33 fl oz), approximate retail value $1.05


I don't have a lot to say about this product because it is (unlike the rest of my box) boring. I was amused that the back of the product read, "ideal for mature or dry skin", as I definitely do not have either mature or dry skin; I have the skin of a greasy 15-year-old. I also thought Birchbox's explanation of why it's supposedly awesome was funny: "Thanks to a pH-balanced formula, this gentle cleanser washes away dirt and oil without disrupting skin’s acid mantle, aka the invisible shield that protects skin from environmental aggressors." That is technically true. However, if you have a product that is NOT designed with your skin's pH in mind, that is a bad product and you really shouldn't use it.

Bland cleansers are good things, ultimately. But it's awfully hard to get worked up about them.

Ahmad Teas in Mint Mystique, Apricot Sunrise, and English Tea No. 1 (3 bags), approximate retail value $0.53


Finally, I got tea. I know some people hate getting tea in their Birchboxes, but I don't mind. The Mighty Leaf Tropical Green Tea that I got from Birchbox is currently part of my weekday morning routine.

These three, unfortunately, didn't blow me away. The Mint Green Tea was fine, but I thought that black teas were too bitter. I'm a green tea drinker, though, so take my opinions with a grain of salt.

Total Box Value: $25.44

Overall, I think this box was fine. The awesome mascara (which I have been using as my "I am running late so I guess I'm going light on the makeup today" mascara) saved the other products that weren't as loveable. (When I add in the value of Birchbox points, though, I feel a lot more happy about my box!) I think the huge variety of products and the large sample sizes, though, bode well for the start of 2014.

If you realize that Birchbox is what is missing in your life, for some reason, you are welcome to use my referral link by clicking here.

Review: Kat Von D Foiled Love Lipstick in F. T. W.

$
0
0
Whoever designs the Kat Von D cosmetic packaging has found a window to my heart. I find that it consistently looks young and ornate, without being over the top. The Foiled Love lipsticks are definitely no exception. The tubes feel substantial and the lovely floral pattern is elegant as heck. Add in a quality product and I am swooning already.


According to Sephora, the Foiled Love lipsticks supposedly "[make] your lips look like they're gift-wrapped in colored metallic foil." Based on this shade, I'd probably call this an exaggeration, but they do leave a nice metallic sheen on your lips. (I think of foil as being REALLY FUCKING SHINY. We're not talking about the dull side of the aluminum foil, right?)


F.T.W. is a purple-leaning cranberry color. It's not as pigmented as you might hope with a single swatch of color, meaning that you have to make a couple of passes to be able to shout out "BAM!" Emeril Lagasse-style. You can definitely get there with a little effort, though!

Three swipes of color.
Incidentally, this flaw is made up for a bit by the lipstick's other potential flaw: it leans on the dry side. This means that even though it takes a few passes to get some acceptable color, it does stay pretty nicely. It didn't have any problems with it drying out my lips, but those of you whose lips lean on the dryer side might have more concerns.

Thanks to the dryer texture, FTW does just fine on my "four hours and meal" test, although some of the frosty, metallic glitz is gone four hours in. You're left with only the color.

Here's how FTW looks when applied:


And here is how it looks four hours and a meal later:


Overall, I like this product a lot. The packaging is great, the color is great, and the product quality is good. 

The Kat Von D Foiled Love lipsticks retail for $19.00 for 0.11oz, or $172.73 per ounce. This is slightly more than MAC lipsticks, which, at $15 for 0.1 oz, come in at $150 per ounce.
Viewing all 298 articles
Browse latest View live