Birchbox vs. Ipsy: A One Year Analysis by the Numbers

November 23, 2013, 12:56 pm

≫ Next: Review: Bite Beauty Best Bite Set/High Pigment Lip Pencils

≪ Previous: Review: Covergirl Smoky Shadow Blasts

There are a lot of beauty box subscription services out there and they all bring something different to the table. Two of the most oft-compared are Birchbox and Ipsy, likely because they both cost $10 a month. I have now received 15 Birchboxes and 14 Ipsy bags, so it seemed like an opportune time to get into a nitty gritty comparison.

However, I quickly realized that there were a lot of different ways I could approach this comparison. I chose the four ways that I thought would be the most valuable for anyone who is trying to decide if they should join Ipsy or Birchbox. The following sections include:

Test 1 - A t-test comparing the estimated retail values of the two boxes.
Test 1 - A similar t-test where the products that were not valuable to me, personally, were eliminated.
An addendum to Tests 1 and 2 that considers the value of points.
Test 3 - A Chi-square test examining what happens if the two boxes simply go head-to-head.
Test 4 - A comparison of the products I actually purchased after sampling them.
My subjective thoughts and conclusions.

WHICH ONE?

Test 1 - Raw Value

The Description: I calculated the value of my Birchbox and Ipsy the same way that I do every month based on approximate retail value. For example, if a full size product is 1 oz and retails for $30, a 0.25 oz sample would have an approximate retail value of $7.50. I then did a t-test to determine whether Ipsy or Birchbox sends out boxes with higher retail values.
The Benefits: It's an objective test. It could be re-created by anyone. There is no part of this test that is based on how I feel about the box, so if our preferences are different, this test would still be applicable to you.
The Disadvantages: Any of you who have gotten subscription boxes already know that you're probably going to get shit that can't use, at least some of the time. Someone could send me a bottle of Chanel Foundation, but if you send it to me in "Tawny Beige" it's disingenuous to pretend that it's worth $65 because I can't use it.

Birchbox

September 2012
Kate Spade New York Twirl (0.05 oz), approximate retail value $1.18
A Twistband Hair Tie, approximate retail value $1.50
A Tili Bag, approximate retail value $0.71
WEI to go Sleepover Kit (1.0 and 3.0ml), approximate retail value $3.80
21 Drops Aromatherapy Blend in "Focus" (2 ml), approximate retail value $7.73
Birchbox and Color Club Custom Collection Nail Polish (.25 oz), approximate retail value $4.00
Total value of the box: $18.92

October 2012
Lulu Organics Lavender and Clary Sage Hair Powder (5g), approximate retail value $1.32
A Luna Bar in Lemon Zest, approximate retail value $1.25
Karuna Hydrating Treatment Mask, approximate retail value $7
Embryolisse Lait-Creme Concentre 24-Hour Miracle Cream (4ml), approximate retail value $2.13
Naked Princess Naked Shine Luscious Lip Gloss (0.008oz), approximate retail value $2.08
Total value of the box: $13.78

November 2012
Oscar Blandi Pronto Texture & Volume Spray (1 oz), approximate retail value $6.25
Miracle Skin Transformer Vanish Instant Imperfection Corrector (0.1 oz), approximate retail value $5.80
Chuao Chocolatier Assorted ChocoPod in Potato Chip, approximate retail value $1.14
Atelier Cologne Rose Anonyme Petite Cologne Absolue (.05 oz), approximate retail value $3.75
Stila All Over Shimmer Liquid Luminizer, approximate retail value $6.67
Total value of the box: $24.01

December 2012
Thymes Body Lotion in Naia (1.5 oz), approximate retail value $4.05
Thymes Body Lotion in Lotus Santal (no size listed, about 0.15oz), approximate retail value $0.41
Keratase Nutritive Nectar Thermique (0.68 oz), approximate retail value $5.60
ModelCo Shine Ultra Lip Gloss in Berry Pink, retail value $16.00
Juice Beauty Stem Cellular Repair CC Cream in Natural Glow (0.17 oz), approximate retail value $3.90
Total box value: $26.23

January 2013
Lumiere d'hiver Clarifying Shampoo (1.75oz), approximate retail value $6.67
Fresh Lotus Youth Preserve Face Cream (0.14oz), approximate retail value $3.48
Harvey Prince Skinny Chic (estimated at 2ml), approximate retail value $1.82
Lashem Double Trouble Mascara (estimated at 1ml), approximate retail value $4.76
TheBalm Hot Mama (1g), approximate retail value $3.11
Total Box Value: $19.84

February 2013
Beauty Protector Protect and Detangle (estimated 1.25 oz), approximate retail value $4.12
Color Club Nail Polish in Wild Cactus (0.25 oz), approximate retail value $4.00
Dr. Jart+ Black Label Detox Beauty Balm (0.1 oz), approximate retail value $2.13
Juicy Couture Couture La La Perfume (0.05 oz), approximate retail value $1.32
Ghirardelli Milk and Caramel Square, approximate retail value $0.42
Total box value: $11.99

March 2013
Whish Shave Crave Shaving Cream in Blueberry (0.75oz), approximate retail value $2.93
Madewell for Birchbox Nail Emery Board, approximate retail value $5
Benefit Stay Don't Stray Primer (0.09oz), approximate retail value $7.09
Evologie Intensive Blemish Serum (0.17oz), approximate retail value $11.90
Twistband Headband, approximate retail value $3.17
Total Box Value: $30.09

April 2013
Nexxus Youth Renewal Rejuvenating Elixir (0.14 oz/4mL), approximate retail value $3.00
LaFace Laboratories PUR Purifying Face Wash (0.1oz/3mL), approximate retail value $0.64
Folle de Joie eau de parfum (0.06oz/2mL), approximate retail value $1.73
Mirenesse Glossy Kiss in Flirty Kiss (0.15oz/4g), approximate retail value $26.55
Simple Revitalizing Eye Roll-on (0.5oz/15mL), approximate retail value $10.99
Total Box Value: $42.91

May 2013
Amika Obliphica Nourishing Mask (0.67oz), approximate retail value $1.60
Sumita Color Contrast Eyeliner in Suman/Black (0.024oz), approximate retail value $5.25
Run Guyausa Tea (4 bags), approximate retail value $1.75
COOLA Classic SPF 30 Cucumber Moisturizer for Face (0.23oz), approximate retail value $4.33
Marvis Toothpaste in Classic Mint (0.5oz), approximate retail value $2.10
Total Box Value: $15.03

June 2013
Suki Exfoliate Foaming Cleanser (0.25 oz), approximate retail value $2.06
Klorane Gentle Dry Shampoo with Oat Milk (1.06 oz), approximate retail value $5.90
SW Basics Lip Balm Flights in Cinnamon, approximate retail value $3.75
Tweezerman Filemate Matchbox Itty Bitty Nail Files, retail value $7.99
Color Club Wanderlust in London Calling (0.25oz), approximate retail value $2.00
Total Box Value: $21.70

July 2013
100% Pure Green Apple Nourishing Body Cream (0.198 oz), approximate retail value $0.37
Benefit Cosmetics Girl Meets Pearl (0.25 oz), approximate retail value $18.75
Number 4 Super Comb Prep & Protect (estimated 0.75 oz), approximate retail value $3.55
Benta Berry G-1 Moisturizing Face Cream (0.16 oz), approximate retail value $3.52
Birchbox Bobby Pins (2), approximate retail value $1.67
Total Box Value: $27.86

August 2013
Dr. Jart+ Premium BB Cream SPF 45+ (5ml/0.17 fluid oz), approximate retail value $4.42
Jasmine Seven Fresh Feet Wipes (2 wipes), approximate retail value $0.66
ModelCo Party Proof Lipstick in Disco Fever (1 at 0.13oz), approximate retail value $8.00
Violet Oasis 100% Organic Argan Oil (4ml/0.14 fluid oz), approximate retail value $2.66
TanTowel Classic Formula Self-Tan Towlette (1 towelette at 0.25oz), approximate retail value $2.40
Total Box Value: $18.14

September 2013
Yes to Grapefruit CC cream in Light and Light Medium (estimated 0.1oz), estimated retail value $0.94
VOESH New York Collagen Gloves - Premium Manicure Hand Mask (1 set of gloves), approximate retail value $6.67
Yes to Blueberries Age Refresh Cleansing Facial Towelettes (8 wipes), retail value $2.99
Ruffian Nail Lacquer in Hedge Fund (full size at 0.17oz), retail value $10
Coastal Scents Eyeshadow Sample in Set 34 Thrill Ride (0.07oz), approximate retail value $3.06
Total Box Value: $23.66

October 2013
TheBalm Stainiac in Beauty Queen (0.04 fluid oz), approximate retail value $2.27
Beauty Protector Protect and Detangle 'Protect & Shampoo' Daily Shampoo (estimated 0.75 fluid oz), estimated retail value $2.05
Beauty Protector Protect and Detangle 'Protect & Condition' Daily Conditioner (estimated 0.75 fluid oz), estimated retail value $2.05
Evologie Stay Clear Cream (0.33oz), approximate retail value $20.46
Chapstick Hydration Lock (full size at 0.15oz), retail value $2.99
Total Box Value: $29.82

November 2013
Eyeko Skinny Liquid Liner (0.04oz), approximate retail value $9.14
Mighty Leaf Tea Pouches in Green Tea Tropical, Organic African Nectar, and Vanilla Bean, approximate retail value $1.99
Vasanti Brighten Up! Enzymatic Face Rejuvenator (0.71oz), approximate retail value $5.67
BeeKind Body Lotion (1.01 fluid oz), approximate retail value $1.89
Color Club Cocktail Hour Collection in On the Rocks (0.25 fluid oz), approximate retail value $4.00
Total Box Value: $22.69

Birchbox Statistics:
Data Set- $18.92, $13.78, $24.01, $26.23, $19.18, $11.99, $30.09, $42.91, $15.03, $21.70, $27.86, $18.14, $23.66, $29.82, $22.69
Mean Value- $23.07
Median Value- $22.69
Standard Deviation- $7.82
Range of Values- $11.99 to $42.91
Range- $30.92

Ipsy

October 2012
Coastal Scents Eye Shadow Quad (0.07 oz), approximate retail value $3.06
Couture Colour Pequi Oil Treatment (0.5oz), approximate retail value $12.00
Be a Bombshell Eye Liner in Onyx, approximate retail value $14.00
Mirenesse Lip Bomb Glossy Lacquer Stain, approximate retail value $35.10
theBalm What's Your Type? "the body builder" Mascara (0.11 oz), approximate retail value $5.50
Total Box Value: $69.71

November 2012
Nailtini Nail Polish in Millionaire, approximate retail value $13.00
Chella Eyebrow Defining Gel, approximate retail value $18.00
BareMinerals Marvelous Moxie Lipgloss in Dare Devil, approximate retail value $8.40
Starlet Peace, Love & Chocolate Eyeliner, approximate retail value $11.00
Meet Matt(e) eyeshadow in Matt Batali, approximate retail value $3.83
Total Box Value: $54.23

December 2012
Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Eye Pencil in Zero (0.8g), approximate retail value $12.67
Be a Bombshell Lip Gloss in Hot Mess, retail value $14.00
NYX Ultra Pearl Mania in Mink Pearl, retail value $3.00
Mirabella Prime for Face and Eyes, retail value $29.00
Mai Couture Highlighter "Papier" in St. Bart's (25 sheets), approximate retail value $14.00
Total Value of the Box: $72.67

January 2013
Argan Oil by Josie Maran Cosmetics (0.17oz), approximate retail value $4.17
Pacifica Tuscan Blood Orange Body Butter (2.5oz), retail value $7.00
Big Sexy Hair Spray and Play (1.6oz), retail value $6.00
Nailtini in Bloody Mary, retail value $13.00
Soho New York Eyeliner Brush, retail value $7.99
Total Box Value: $38.16

February 2013
Lash Cards (4), approximate retail value $2.80
Pixi Flawless and Poreless Primer (0.5oz), approximate retail value $14.50
Mica Beauty Gel Eyeliner in Black (3g), approximate retail value $18.00
Pop Beauty Smokey Lash Kapow Mascara (0.17oz), approximate retail value $12.58
Coastal Scents mini quad in Candlelight, Gunmetal, Incognito and Ashen (0.07oz), approximate retail value $2.24
Total box value: $50.12

March 2013
Juice Beauty Hydrating Mist (1oz), approximate retail value $3.38
LA Fresh Travel-Lite Makeup Remover Wipes (8 count), approximate retail value $1.49
Glam RX Mini Freestyle Palette, estimated retail value $4
Yaby Eyeshadow Refill (2 at estimated 0.02oz each), estimated retail value $1.54
Total Box Value: $10.41

April 2013
Sation Nail Color in Love At First Byte, retail value $5.95.
Big Sexy Hair Powder Play (0.07oz), approximate retail value $1.98.
Be a Bombshell Blush in Sweet Cheeks, retail value $16.
Two Cosmetics Duo Eyeshadow in Heartache, retail value $5.75
Total Box Value: $29.68

May 2013
Zoya Nail Polish in Julie, retail value $8.00
Pacifica Island Vanilla Perfume Roll-On, retail value $12.00
Pacifica Coconut Crushed Pearl Bronzing Body Butter Mini, retail value $7.00
Yaby Concealer Refill in Honey (2g), approximate retail value $2.77
Mirabella Shimmerati Glimmer Gloss, retail value $16.00
Total Box Value: $45.77

June 2013
Starlooks Lip Pencil in Tipsy (2.4g/0.08oz), retail value $12.00
Chella Ivory Lace Highlighter (1.4g/0.05oz), retail value $18.00
Psssst! Instant Dry Shampoo (1.76oz), retail value $3.50
J Cat Sparkling Cream Palette in Suzie (0.1oz), retail value $4.49
NYX Rouge Cream Blush in Natural (0.12oz), retail value $6.00
Total Box Value: $43.99

July 2013
BH Cosmetics California Collection Eyeshadow Sample (estimated 0.09 oz), estimated retail value $0.62
Pop Beauty Pouty Pop Crayon in Coral Crush (0.1 oz), approximate retail value $4.17
Coola Rose Essence Tinted Moisturizer (0.23 oz), approximate retail value $4.87
Healthy Sexy Hair Soy Renewal Beach Spray (1.7 oz), approximate retail value $8.88
Nailtini Nail Polish in Mai Tai (0.5 oz), retail value $6
Total Box Value: $24.54

August 2013
Urban Decay Revolution Lipstick in 69 (0.03oz), approximate retail value $7.33
Mica Beauty Shimmer Powder in Bronze (full size at 0.1oz), retail value $14.95
Smashbox Photo Finish Foundation Primer (0.25oz), approximate retail value $9.75
Michael Todd True Organics Pumpkin Nutrient Rich Facial Mask (1oz), approximate retail value $10.00
Pixi Lash Booster (estimated 0.1 fluid oz), estimated retail value $6.80
Total Box Value: $48.83

September 2013
Victoria Jackson Taupe Eyebrow Pencil (full size at 0.1oz), retail value $14.95
Cailyn Tinted Lip Balm in Big Apple (full size at 0.14oz), retail value $19
Starlooks Kohl Eye Pencil in Obsidian (full size at 0.08oz), retail value $12
NYX Single Eyeshadow in Morocco (full size at 0.085oz), retail value $4.50
Elizabeth Mott It's So Big Volumizing Mascara (0.14 fl oz), approximate retail value $8.00
Total Box Value: $58.45

October 2013
Ole Henriksen Truth Creme Advanced Hydration (0.25 fluid oz), estimated retail value $6.72
Nourish Organic Coconut and Argan Body Lotion (1 fluid oz), estimated retail value $1.25
Buxom Lip Polish in Dolly (0.07 fluid oz), estimated retail value $8.87
Big Sexy Hair Blow Dry Volumizing Gel (1.7 fluid oz), estimated retail value $3.39
Zoya Nail Polish in Mason (full size at 0.5 fluid oz), retail value $8.00
Total Box Value: $28.23

November 2013
Em Cosmetics by Michelle Phan Lash Gallery Lengthening Mascara in Black (full size at 0.236 fluid oz), retail value $20
Starlooks Gem Eye Pencil in Amethyst (full size at 0.08oz), retail value $14
Be A Bombshell Lip Crayon in Hot Damn (full size at 0.09oz), retail value $14
Pixi Beauty Bronzer in Subtly Suntouched (0.11oz), approximate retail value $5.50
GlamGlow YouthMud Tinglexfoliate Treatment (travel size at 0.5 fluid oz), retail value $19
Nailtini Nail Lacquer in Caviar Cocktail (full size at 0.5 fluid oz), retail value $13
Total Box Value: $85.50

Ipsy Statistics:
Data Set- $69.71, $54.23, $72.67, $38.16, $50.12, $10.41, $29.68, $45.77, $43.99, $24.54, $48.83, $58.45, $28.23, $85.50
Mean Value-$47.16
Median Value- $47.30
Standard Deviation- $20.45
Range of Values- $10.41 to $85.50
Range- $75.09

T-test Comparison:
A t-test showed that the difference between the two services was extremely statistically significant, t(27)=4.25, p=0.0002. Ipsy tends to send out boxes that have higher retail values, and that difference is robust.

Test 2 - Personal Value

The Description: This test is similar to Test #1, except that I eliminated the products that didn't add value to my box. A product added value if I was glad to have received it. A product I wanted to try would add value (even if I didn't end up liking it). A product I didn't expect to like but ended up enjoying would also add value. As a side note, I am only including products that gave me value outside of blogging. For example, it was a Juice Beauty product I received from Birchbox that originally inspired my"Beauty Bullshit" series. For the purposes of this test, that doesn't count as value (even though I hope those posts are valuable!).
The Benefits: This test takes into account the fact that subscription services are sometimes going to send out crap without asking me to come up with subjective values for products.
The Disadvantages: There is no objective measure for "crap". There is someone out there who likes products that I hate. If you have a different idea about what is crap, you may find that your results are different. I can only tell you what I didn't like and didn't use.

Birchbox Test #2

September 2012
~~Kate Spade New York Twirl (0.05 oz), approximate retail value $1.18~~
A Twistband Hair Tie, approximate retail value $1.50
~~A Tili Bag, approximate retail value $0.71~~
WEI to go Sleepover Kit (1.0 and 3.0ml), approximate retail value $3.80
21 Drops Aromatherapy Blend in "Focus" (2 ml), approximate retail value $7.73
Birchbox and Color Club Custom Collection Nail Polish (.25 oz), approximate retail value $4.00
Total Personal Value: $17.03

October 2012
Lulu Organics Lavender and Clary Sage Hair Powder (5g), approximate retail value $1.32
~~A Luna Bar in Lemon Zest, approximate retail value $1.25~~
Karuna Hydrating Treatment Mask, approximate retail value $7
~~Embryolisse Lait-Creme Concentre 24-Hour Miracle Cream (4ml), approximate retail value $2.13~~
~~Naked Princess Naked Shine Luscious Lip Gloss (0.008oz), approximate retail value $2.08~~
Total Personal Value: $8.32

November 2012
Oscar Blandi Pronto Texture & Volume Spray (1 oz), approximate retail value $6.25
Miracle Skin Transformer Vanish Instant Imperfection Corrector (0.1 oz), approximate retail value $5.80
Chuao Chocolatier Assorted ChocoPod in Potato Chip, approximate retail value $1.14
Atelier Cologne Rose Anonyme Petite Cologne Absolue (.05 oz), approximate retail value $3.75
Stila All Over Shimmer Liquid Luminizer, approximate retail value $6.67
Total Personal Value: $24.01

December 2012
Thymes Body Lotion in Naia (1.5 oz), approximate retail value $4.05
Thymes Body Lotion in Lotus Santal (no size listed, about 0.15oz), approximate retail value $0.41
~~Keratase Nutritive Nectar Thermique (0.68 oz), approximate retail value $5.60~~
ModelCo Shine Ultra Lip Gloss in Berry Pink, retail value $16.00
~~Juice Beauty Stem Cellular Repair CC Cream in Natural Glow (0.17 oz), approximate retail value $3.90~~
Total Personal value: $20.46

January 2013
Lumiere d'hiver Clarifying Shampoo (1.75oz), approximate retail value $6.67
Fresh Lotus Youth Preserve Face Cream (0.14oz), approximate retail value $3.48
Harvey Prince Skinny Chic (estimated at 2ml), approximate retail value $1.82
Lashem Double Trouble Mascara (estimated at 1ml), approximate retail value $4.76
TheBalm Hot Mama (1g), approximate retail value $3.11
Total Personal Value: $19.84

February 2013
Beauty Protector Protect and Detangle (estimated 1.25 oz), approximate retail value $4.12
Color Club Nail Polish in Wild Cactus (0.25 oz), approximate retail value $4.00
Dr. Jart+ Black Label Detox Beauty Balm (0.1 oz), approximate retail value $2.13
~~Juicy Couture Couture La La Perfume (0.05 oz), approximate retail value $1.32~~
~~Ghirardelli Milk and Caramel Square, approximate retail value $0.42~~
Total Personal value: $10.25

March 2013
Whish Shave Crave Shaving Cream in Blueberry (0.75oz), approximate retail value $2.93
~~Madewell for Birchbox Nail Emery Board, approximate retail value $5~~
~~Benefit Stay Don't Stray Primer (0.09oz), approximate retail value $7.09~~
~~Evologie Intensive Blemish Serum (0.17oz), approximate retail value $11.90~~
Twistband Headband, approximate retail value $3.17
Total Personal Value: $6.10

April 2013
~~Nexxus Youth Renewal Rejuvenating Elixir (0.14 oz/4mL), approximate retail value $3.00~~
~~LaFace Laboratories PUR Purifying Face Wash (0.1oz/3mL), approximate retail value $0.64~~
Folle de Joie eau de parfum (0.06oz/2mL), approximate retail value $1.73
Mirenesse Glossy Kiss in Flirty Kiss (0.15oz/4g), approximate retail value $26.55
~~Simple Revitalizing Eye Roll-on (0.5oz/15mL), approximate retail value $10.99~~
Total Personal Value: $28.28

May 2013
~~Amika Obliphica Nourishing Mask (0.67oz), approximate retail value $1.60~~
Sumita Color Contrast Eyeliner in Suman/Black (0.024oz), approximate retail value $5.25
~~Run Guyausa Tea (4 bags), approximate retail value $1.75~~
COOLA Classic SPF 30 Cucumber Moisturizer for Face (0.23oz), approximate retail value $4.33
~~Marvis Toothpaste in Classic Mint (0.5oz), approximate retail value $2.10~~
Total Personal Value: $9.58

June 2013
Suki Exfoliate Foaming Cleanser (0.25 oz), approximate retail value $2.06
Klorane Gentle Dry Shampoo with Oat Milk (1.06 oz), approximate retail value $5.90
SW Basics Lip Balm Flights in Cinnamon, approximate retail value $3.75
~~Tweezerman Filemate Matchbox Itty Bitty Nail Files, retail value $7.99~~
Color Club Wanderlust in London Calling (0.25oz), approximate retail value $2.00
Total Personal Value: $13.71

July 2013
~~100% Pure Green Apple Nourishing Body Cream (0.198 oz), approximate retail value $0.37~~
~~Benefit Cosmetics Girl Meets Pearl (0.25 oz), approximate retail value $18.75~~
~~Number 4 Super Comb Prep & Protect (estimated 0.75 oz), approximate retail value $3.55~~
~~Benta Berry G-1 Moisturizing Face Cream (0.16 oz), approximate retail value $3.52~~
Birchbox Bobby Pins (2), approximate retail value $1.67
Total Personal Value: $1.67

August 2013
Dr. Jart+ Premium BB Cream SPF 45+ (5ml/0.17 fluid oz), approximate retail value $4.42
Jasmine Seven Fresh Feet Wipes (2 wipes), approximate retail value $0.66
ModelCo Party Proof Lipstick in Disco Fever (1 at 0.13oz), approximate retail value $8.00
~~Violet Oasis 100% Organic Argan Oil (4ml/0.14 fluid oz), approximate retail value $2.66~~
~~TanTowel Classic Formula Self-Tan Towlette (1 towelette at 0.25oz), approximate retail value $2.40~~
Total Personal Value: $13.08

September 2013
~~Yes to Grapefruit CC cream in Light and Light Medium (estimated 0.1oz), estimated retail value $0.94~~
~~VOESH New York Collagen Gloves - Premium Manicure Hand Mask (1 set of gloves), approximate retail value $6.67~~
Yes to Blueberries Age Refresh Cleansing Facial Towelettes (8 wipes), retail value $2.99
Ruffian Nail Lacquer in Hedge Fund (full size at 0.17oz), retail value $10
Coastal Scents Eyeshadow Sample in Set 34 Thrill Ride (0.07oz), approximate retail value $3.06
Total Personal Value: $16.05

October 2013
TheBalm Stainiac in Beauty Queen (0.04 fluid oz), approximate retail value $2.27
Beauty Protector Protect and Detangle 'Protect & Shampoo' Daily Shampoo (estimated 0.75 fluid oz), estimated retail value $2.05
Beauty Protector Protect and Detangle 'Protect & Condition' Daily Conditioner (estimated 0.75 fluid oz), estimated retail value $2.05
Evologie Stay Clear Cream (0.33oz), approximate retail value $20.46
Chapstick Hydration Lock (full size at 0.15oz), retail value $2.99
Total Personal Value: $29.82

November 2013
Eyeko Skinny Liquid Liner (0.04oz), approximate retail value $9.14
Mighty Leaf Tea Pouches in Green Tea Tropical, Organic African Nectar, and Vanilla Bean, approximate retail value $1.99
Vasanti Brighten Up! Enzymatic Face Rejuvenator (0.71oz), approximate retail value $5.67
~~BeeKind Body Lotion (1.01 fluid oz), approximate retail value $1.89~~
Color Club Cocktail Hour Collection in On the Rocks (0.25 fluid oz), approximate retail value $4.00
Total Personal Value: $20.80

Birchbox Statistics:
Data Set- $17.03, 8.32, 24.01, 20.46, 19.84, 10.25, 6.10, 28.28, 9.58, 13.71, 1.67, 13.08, 16.05, 29.82, 20.80
Mean Value-$15.93
Median Value- $16.05
Standard Deviation- $8.08
Range of Values- $1.67 to 29.82
Range- $28.15

Ipsy Test #2

October 2012
Coastal Scents Eye Shadow Quad (0.07 oz), approximate retail value $3.06
~~Couture Colour Pequi Oil Treatment (0.5oz), approximate retail value $12.00~~
Be a Bombshell Eye Liner in Onyx, approximate retail value $14.00
Mirenesse Lip Bomb Glossy Lacquer Stain, approximate retail value $35.10
theBalm What's Your Type? "the body builder" Mascara (0.11 oz), approximate retail value $5.50
Total Personal Value: $57.66

November 2012
~~Nailtini Nail Polish in Millionaire, approximate retail value $13.00~~
~~Chella Eyebrow Defining Gel, approximate retail value $18.00~~
BareMinerals Marvelous Moxie Lipgloss in Dare Devil, approximate retail value $8.40
~~Starlet Peace, Love & Chocolate Eyeliner, approximate retail value $11.00~~
Meet Matt(e) eyeshadow in Matt Batali, approximate retail value $3.83
Total Personal Value: $12.23

December 2012
Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Eye Pencil in Zero (0.8g), approximate retail value $12.67
~~Be a Bombshell Lip Gloss in Hot Mess, retail value $14.00~~
~~NYX Ultra Pearl Mania in Mink Pearl, retail value $3.00~~
~~Mirabella Prime for Face and Eyes, retail value $29.00~~
~~Mai Couture Highlighter "Papier" in St. Bart's (25 sheets), approximate retail value $14.00~~
Total Personal Value: $12.67

January 2013
~~Argan Oil by Josie Maran Cosmetics (0.17oz), approximate retail value $4.17~~
~~Pacifica Tuscan Blood Orange Body Butter (2.5oz), retail value $7.00~~
~~Big Sexy Hair Spray and Play (1.6oz), retail value $6.00~~
~~Nailtini in Bloody Mary, retail value $13.00~~
Soho New York Eyeliner Brush, retail value $7.99
Total Personal Value: $7.99

February 2013
~~Lash Cards (4), approximate retail value $2.80~~
Pixi Flawless and Poreless Primer (0.5oz), approximate retail value $14.50
Mica Beauty Gel Eyeliner in Black (3g), approximate retail value $18.00
~~Pop Beauty Smokey Lash Kapow Mascara (0.17oz), approximate retail value $12.58~~
Coastal Scents mini quad in Candlelight, Gunmetal, Incognito and Ashen (0.07oz), approximate retail value $2.24
Total Personal value: $34.74

March 2013
~~Juice Beauty Hydrating Mist (1oz), approximate retail value $3.38~~
~~LA Fresh Travel-Lite Makeup Remover Wipes (8 count), approximate retail value $1.49~~
~~Glam RX Mini Freestyle Palette, estimated retail value $4~~
~~Yaby Eyeshadow Refill (2 at estimated 0.02oz each), estimated retail value $1.54~~
Total Personal Value: $0.00

April 2013
~~Sation Nail Color in Love At First Byte, retail value $5.95.~~
~~Big Sexy Hair Powder Play (0.07oz), approximate retail value $1.98.~~
Be a Bombshell Blush in Sweet Cheeks, retail value $16.
Two Cosmetics Duo Eyeshadow in Heartache, retail value $5.75
Total Personal Value: $21.75

May 2013
~~Zoya Nail Polish in Julie, retail value $8.00~~
~~Pacifica Island Vanilla Perfume Roll-On, retail value $12.00~~
~~Pacifica Coconut Crushed Pearl Bronzing Body Butter Mini, retail value $7.00~~
~~Yaby Concealer Refill in Honey (2g), approximate retail value $2.77~~
~~Mirabella Shimmerati Glimmer Gloss, retail value $16.00~~
Total Personal Value: $0.00

June 2013
Starlooks Lip Pencil in Tipsy (2.4g/0.08oz), retail value $12.00
Chella Ivory Lace Highlighter (1.4g/0.05oz), retail value $18.00
Psssst! Instant Dry Shampoo (1.76oz), retail value $3.50
~~J Cat Sparkling Cream Palette in Suzie (0.1oz), retail value $4.49~~
NYX Rouge Cream Blush in Natural (0.12oz), retail value $6.00
Total Personal Value: $39.50

July 2013
~~BH Cosmetics California Collection Eyeshadow Sample (estimated 0.09 oz), estimated retail value $0.62~~
~~Pop Beauty Pouty Pop Crayon in Coral Crush (0.1 oz), approximate retail value $4.17~~
~~Coola Rose Essence Tinted Moisturizer (0.23 oz), approximate retail value $4.87~~
Healthy Sexy Hair Soy Renewal Beach Spray (1.7 oz), approximate retail value $8.88
~~Nailtini Nail Polish in Mai Tai (0.5 oz), retail value $6~~
Total Personal Value: $8.88

August 2013
Urban Decay Revolution Lipstick in 69 (0.03oz), approximate retail value $7.33
~~Mica Beauty Shimmer Powder in Bronze (full size at 0.1oz), retail value $14.95~~
~~Smashbox Photo Finish Foundation Primer (0.25oz), approximate retail value $9.75~~
Michael Todd True Organics Pumpkin Nutrient Rich Facial Mask (1oz), approximate retail value $10.00
~~Pixi Lash Booster (estimated 0.1 fluid oz), estimated retail value $6.80~~
Total Personal Value: $17.33

September 2013
Victoria Jackson Taupe Eyebrow Pencil (full size at 0.1oz), retail value $14.95
~~Cailyn Tinted Lip Balm in Big Apple (full size at 0.14oz), retail value $19~~
~~Starlooks Kohl Eye Pencil in Obsidian (full size at 0.08oz), retail value $12~~
NYX Single Eyeshadow in Morocco (full size at 0.085oz), retail value $4.50
~~Elizabeth Mott It's So Big Volumizing Mascara (0.14 fl oz), approximate retail value $8.00~~
Total Personal Value: $19.45

October 2013
Ole Henriksen Truth Creme Advanced Hydration (0.25 fluid oz), estimated retail value $6.72
~~Nourish Organic Coconut and Argan Body Lotion (1 fluid oz), estimated retail value $1.25~~
~~Buxom Lip Polish in Dolly (0.07 fluid oz), estimated retail value $8.87~~
~~Big Sexy Hair Blow Dry Volumizing Gel (1.7 fluid oz), estimated retail value $3.39~~
~~Zoya Nail Polish in Mason (full size at 0.5 fluid oz), retail value $8.00~~
Total Personal Value: $6.72

November 2013
~~Em Cosmetics by Michelle Phan Lash Gallery Lengthening Mascara in Black (full size at 0.236 fluid oz), retail value $20~~
Starlooks Gem Eye Pencil in Amethyst (full size at 0.08oz), retail value $14
~~Be A Bombshell Lip Crayon in Hot Damn (full size at 0.09oz), retail value $14~~
Pixi Beauty Bronzer in Subtly Suntouched (0.11oz), approximate retail value $5.50
GlamGlow YouthMud Tinglexfoliate Treatment (travel size at 0.5 fluid oz), retail value $19
~~Nailtini Nail Lacquer in Caviar Cocktail (full size at 0.5 fluid oz), retail value $13~~
Total Personal Value: $38.50

Ipsy Statistics:
Data Set- $57.66, 12.23, 12.67, 7.99, 34.74, 0, 21.75, 0, 39.50, 8.88, 17.33, 19.45, 6.72, 38.50
Mean Value-$19.82
Median Value- $15.00
Standard Deviation- $16.93
Range of Values- $0 - 57.66
Range- $57.66

T-Test Comparison:
It turns out that when you take out all the shit that I didn't want to get in the first place, there is no statistically significant difference between the values of the two boxes, t(27)=0.4325, p>0.05.

Addendum to Tests #1 and 2 - The Issue of Points

You'll note that I did not include points in Test #1 or Test #2.

For the purpose of this addendum, I'm going to explore what happens if you add in the value of points. Both Birchbox and Ipsy have points systems, although Birchbox's point system is more established and more valuable. I intend to ignore the issue of referrals since the average person is probably not making a buttload of referrals.

Ipsy offers 250 points for referrals and 10 points for product reviews. However, it is 1000 points to actually redeem something. Since your points expire in a year, people who aren't making referrals aren't going to be able to redeem their points for anything. (Approximately 50 points a month times 12 months is only 600 points...) Thus, for the purposes of this analysis, Ipsy points are worthless.

Birchbox points are worth money in the Birchbox store. 100 points are worth $10. You get 10% back in points for shopping in the Birchbox store, 50 points for making referrals, and 10 points for giving feedback on products. Although you can only redeem points in intervals of 100, each of those product reviews has an approximate value of $1.

So, when you add in the value of points, your estimated box values change slightly. For example, in Test #1, the data set for Birchbox becomes: $24.92, $18.78, $29.01, $31.23, $24.18, $16.99, $35.09, $47.91, $20.03, $26.70, $32.86, $23.14, $28.66, $34.82, $27.69.

I conducted two t-tests to see whether my results for Test #1 and Test #2 changed when you added in the Birchbox points, and they did not. Ipsy still came out ahead in Test #1 and there was still no statistically significant difference in Test #2. With that, I adore the Birchbox points system.

Test #3 - Head-to-Head

The Description: Instead of trying to calculate value, I just did a basic head-to-head for each month that I have been subscribed to the two services. I then ran a Chi-square test to check for statistical significance.
The Benefits: This eliminates all the worries about whether or not I really got X-number-of-dollars-of-value out of Y product. It's the most basic way to compare services on a multitude of levels. Which did I like better?
The Disadvantages: Again, this is a highly subjective test. There also isn't a lot of statistical power in only 14 months worth of data.

Ipsy and Birchbox, Head-to-Head

(Obviously, I can't do September 2012, since I didn't get an Ipsy that month.)

October 2012
Winner: Ipsy
The Mirenesse lip lacquer and theBalm Body Builder mascara are still favorites of mine.

November 2012
Winner: Birchbox
I still use the Oscar Blandi Texture Spray that Birchbox sent (I bought a full size), I bought a million Chuao chocolate bars, and the Atelier Cologne Rose Anonyme is on my list of things that I will perpetually lust over.

December 2012
Winner: Birchbox
I purchased a full size of the Thymes Body Lotion and I still use that ModelCo lipgloss when I am lazy or in a rush. (I used it in my three-minute makeup challenge video!)

January 2013
Winner: Birchbox
I got personal value out of all the products sent in my Birchbox, whereas Ipsy was largely a bust.

February 2013
Winner: Birchbox
The Beauty Protector Protect and Detangle is one of my all-time favorite products, and Wild Cactus by Color Club is the most perfect shade of green polish.

March 2013
Winner: Birchbox
I hated everything I got in that Ipsy. Although my Birchbox wasn't killer, I did purchase that Whish shaving cream in the full size... and I just recently re-purchased it in the almond scent. I also use that Twistband headband all the time and may purchase more of them for lazy weekend days.

April 2013
Winner: Ipsy
This was a close one, but I loved all the shimmery pink products from this Ipsy bag!

May 2013
Winner: Birchbox
Neither box was particularly good, but I did like the Sumita eyeliner I received from Birchbox (and I did end up buying it in green).

June 2013
Winner: Birchbox
Both boxes were awesome this month. From Birchbox, I ended up purchasing the Suki Exfoliate Cleaner (I re-purchased this one, as well), the Klorane Gentle Dry Shampoo with Oat Milk, SW Basics Lip Balm Flights, AND the Color Club Wanderlust Collection. From Ipsy, I still regularly use Chella Ivory Lace Highlighter (and would purchase) and the NYX Rouge Cream Blush. For sheer magnitude of "shit I loved", though, the win has to go to Birchbox.

July 2013
Winner: Ipsy? I guess?
Both of these boxes were AWFUL. However, the Beach Spray from Ipsy wasn't the worst thing in the world. (With that said, I still use the bobby pins I got from Birchbox and I have no idea what happened to the Ipsy spray.)

August 2013
Winner: Ipsy
An Urban Decay Revolution lipstick sample and a Michael Todd mask? SOLD.

September 2013
Winner: Ipsy
The discovery of the Victoria Jackson brow pencil was more valuable than the products I received that I enjoyed from Birchbox.

October 2013
Winner: Birchbox
Most of the Birchbox Products weren't huge wins, but most of Ipsy products were awful.

November 2013
Winner: Ipsy
I was super excited about the GlamGlow, the Pixi Bronzer, and the Starlooks Gem Eye Pencil.

Birchbox Total Wins: 8
Ipsy Total Wins: 6

I probably don't have to actually conduct the Chi-Square Test for y'all to know that that isn't going to be statistically significant, but I will anyways. Clearly, with 14 months of data, the null hypothesis would predict that Birchbox would win 7 times and Ipsy would win 7 times. My Chi-Square test showed that we could not reject the null hypothesis, c²(1, N = 14) = 0.286, p = 0.5930.

To be fair, 14 data points isn't very much. One of the brands would have had to win 11 times for significance to be detected in such a small sample size. Still, even if we don't worry about the p-value, I feel super comfortable attributing this slight difference to chance. There doesn't seem to be a marked difference in which box I, personally, prefer.

Test #4 - What Did I Actually Buy?

The Description: This is a simple list of the products that I purchased after sampling them from Birchbox or Ipsy. I debated exactly how I wanted to operationally define this category because 1. I have purchased a ton of things from the Birchbox shop that I didn't sample in my box and 2. There are two things I purchased after sampling from Ipsy that I'm pretty sure I would have purchased either way. I ended up listing everything that I purchased after sampling that I had not already tried prior to the subscription service.
The Benefits: One of the reasons that I use subscription services is to find new, amazing products that I might otherwise never have encountered. This is an easy way to see whether Ipsy or Birchbox is facilitating that process more effectively.
The Disadvantages: This does not apply to people who subscribe to Birchbox or Ipsy for reasons other than finding new HG products.

What I Bought After Sampling From Birchbox:
WEI to go Sleepover Kit
Oscar Blandi Pronto Texture & Volume Spray
Chuao Chocolatier Assorted ChocoPod
Thymes Body Lotion in Lotus Santal
Beauty Protector Protect and Detangle
Color Club Nail Polish
Dr. Jart+ Black Label Detox Beauty Balm (I ended up hating this, but I did buy it.)
Whish Shave Crave Shaving Cream
Sumita Color Contrast Eyeliner
Suki Exfoliate Foaming Cleanser
Klorane Gentle Dry Shampoo with Oat Milk
SW Basics Lip Balm Flights

What I Bought After Sampling From Ipsy:
TheBalm What's Your Type? "the body builder" Mascara
Mirenesse Lip Bomb Glossy Lacquer Stain
TheBalm Meet Matt(e) Eyeshadow Palette
Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Eye Pencil

It is immediately apparent that I purchased more based on Birchbox samples than Ipsy samples. (Additionally, I strongly suspect that I would have bought Meet Matt(e) and the UD 24/7 Liner either way.) I went ahead and did a Chi-square test on this data as well and found that I do clearly purchase more based on products that I received in my Birchbox, c²(1, N = 16) = 4.00, p < 0.05. To me, this suggest that Birchbox sends me more products that impress me and that they are making a bigger impact on my beauty routine.

In Conclusion, My Totally Subjective Feelings

I think that the statistics clearly demonstrate the feelings that I have always had about these two services. When Ipsy is good, they're good, but they send out a lot of crap alongside their nicer products. Birchbox sends out smaller samples, but they are much more consistent and they are more likely to send you something that you feel the need to purchase.

I would recommend Ipsy to someone who is looking for a monthly makeup gift, and I would recommend to Birchbox to someone who is looking to discover new products to love (and purchase). Personally, I fully intend to stay subscribed to both services.

If you would like to join Birchbox, please feel free to use my referral link by clicking here.
If you would like to join Ipsy, my referral link is available here.

↧

Review: Bite Beauty Best Bite Set/High Pigment Lip Pencils

November 24, 2013, 8:26 pm

≫ Next: A Guide to Sephora's 2013 $10 Black Friday Deals

≪ Previous: Birchbox vs. Ipsy: A One Year Analysis by the Numbers

Value sets, cute packaging, and lip pencils are a few of my favorite things. Way fucking better than raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens. (Note: I will accept brown paper packages tied up with strings... if they are from Sephora.)

The Bite Beauty Best Bite Set is the perfect way to fulfill those desires.

This set contains four miniature High Pigment Lip Pencils in Madeira, Quince, Rhubarb, and Cranberry, encased in a mirrored tin with impressive adorability. (Look! There's fruit on it! I like fruit!)

The pencils twist up, which is a nice feature for those of us who are ~~lazy~~ busy.

I am a real person, so my lip pencils and nails are messy. My eyebrows are pretty good, though, so I've got that going for me.

The finish is moderately glossy, but they're all fully opaque. They're super smooth and lovely to apply.

Bite Beauty Best Bite Set Swatches

Here's how they look on my face:

Madeira is as nude as fuck. It's definitely darker than my skin, but there will be many (many, many) people for whom this will not be the case. The color is moderately warm, with a tiny bit of an orange-y tone.

Bite Beauty Madeira on Human Face

Quince is my favorite of the lot. Sephora describes this as a "rose berry". I definitely think it's brighter than that, though. It's more of a mid-tone fuchsia.

The name originally received an eyebrow raise from me since, uh, that's not what color a quince is, but it turns out that chaenomeles, which are related to the quince, have brightly colored flowers that could conceivably be seen as similar to this lip pencil if you did some photoshopping and squinted a little.

Bite Beauty Quince on Human Face

Rhubarb is a rosey mauve shade that is actually strikingly similar to the color of rhubarb that's cooking on the stove. Since rhubarb is by far my favorite stalk (team pie!), this pleases me.

Bite Beauty Rhubarb on Human Face

Cranberry is another gorgeous color. It's a red that just screams for a sexy Santa Clause costume. If you hate this lipcolor, I can only assume that you also hate Christmas.

Bite Beauty Cranberry on Human Face

I also did a "four hours and a meal" test on Quince.

Quince, when applied.

Quince, four hours and a meal later, in the shitty lighting of my parked car.

The color stayed pretty nicely through the four hours, but the glossiness definitely had disappeared. Quince, Cranberry, and Rhubarb all leave a distinct stain that will keep color on your lips substantially after the gloss goes away.

The Bite Beauty Best Bite Set retails for $25 for four 0.05oz pencils ($125 per ounce). The full-size pencils retail for $24 for 0.09oz ($266.67 per ounce). This means that each of the minis is worth approximately $13.33. That means that you are coming out ahead even if you only like two of the four colors in the set. Personally, I know that I will use every color except Madeira, so I'm really happy with my purchase.

↧

A Guide to Sephora's 2013 $10 Black Friday Deals

November 25, 2013, 7:23 am

≫ Next: Review: Maybelline Eye Studio Lasting Drama Gel Eyeliner

≪ Previous: Review: Bite Beauty Best Bite Set/High Pigment Lip Pencils

Sephora has officially released their $10 Black Friday deals! You can check out pictures on their Pinterest by clicking here. Although they haven't listed sizes on Pinterest, I think we can make a pretty safe assumption that the minis are the same size as the regular minis, travel-sizes, and sample sizes that these brands usually produce. For example, there is a set of Bite Beauty lipgloss minis. I have a Bite Beauty lip gloss mini. It is 0.1oz. It looks the same as the ones in the pictures on Pinterest. I feel comfortable, then, concluding that the lip glosses in the Bite Beauty $10 Black Friday deal are also 0.1oz and I'm making my statements of value based on that assertion. Additionally, many of the sizes are visible in the Sephora promo pictures. If I get shit wrong, my numbers will obviously be wrong. This is the best estimate that I have based on the information that is currently available.

There are also some $10 deals that have no calculable equivalent. They are products that are not sold during the rest of the year. I am putting those deals first and I'm just going to talk about them. If you are only interested in the value sets, you may want to just scroll past this section. Finally, at the bottom, I'm going to state what I intend on purchasing on Black Friday and why.

Source: http://www.pinterest.com/sephora/black-friday-2013/

Sets that Do Not Have Calculable Values (Alphabetically):

Nails Inc. Crystaltastic Nails
Contains:
False Nail Set
Comments: I can find no other false nail sets on the Sephora website, so it's difficult to gauge whether or not this is actually a 'deal'.

Sephora Collection Sparklers Brush Set
Contains:
A powder brush, a shadow brush, and a liner brush
Comments: I actually have this brush set from last year, when it was gold and called the "Gilded Trio Brush Set". The eyeshadow brush is awful, but I do use the eyeliner brush to fill in my brows and I use the powder brush for highlighting. This would be an okay purchase for someone who is really shy on brushes.

Stila Artful Eye Collector’s Palette (3 Colors)
Contains:
0.27oz Eyeshadow
Comments: These palettes are already available on the Sephora website. At $10 for 0.27oz, this product comes out to $37.04 per ounce, which is comparable to drugstore eyeshadow prices.

Stila Collage of Color Lip & Cheek Palette
Contains:
0.33oz Convertible Colors
Comments: There is a non-zero chance that this is 0.11 oz TOTAL, as the eyeshadow palette is labeled 0.27 X 5 when it is clearly 0.27 total oz. If the website is correct, it is $30.30 per ounce. If it is incorrect, it is $90.91 per ounce.

Sets that Do Have Calculable Values (Organized from Worst to Best Value):

Lavanilla the Healthy Deodorant in Vanilla Grapefruit
Contains:
Travel Size Deodorant (0.9 oz), retail value $8
Total Value: $8

TokyoMilk Takeout
Contains:
Eau de Parfum Tainted Love #62 (0.16 oz), approximate retail value $3.39
Get Lucky Lip Tint, estimated retail value $7.00
Total Value: $10.39

Living Proof The Full Collection
Contains:
Full Shampoo (1 fl oz), approximate retail value $3
Full Conditioner (1 fl oz), approximate retail value $3
Style Extendant (1 fl oz), approximate retail value $4
Full Thickening Cream (0.5 fl oz), approximate retail value $3.51
Total Value: $13.51

Tocca Florence Travel Fragrance Duo
Contains:
Hand Cream (2 fl oz), retail value $8.00
Tocca Perfume (0.14 fl oz), retail value $5.60
Total Value: $13.60

Ole Henriksen Clean Sweep Duo
Contains:
African Red Tea Foaming Cleanser (1.5 fl oz), retail value $9.00
Truth To Go Wipes (10 wipes), approximate retail value $5.00
Total Value: $14.00

Boscia Pore Perfection Set
Contains:
Luminizing Black Mask (1 fl oz), approximate retail value $12.14
Pore Purifying Black Strips (1), approximate retail value $2.33
Total Value: $14.47

Formula X ASAP Real Nail Lacquer Duo Pack
Contains:
2 Colors of Nail Strips, estimated retail value $15.00
Total Value: $15

Vita Liberata Rich Face + Mini Mitt Duo
Contains:
Self Tan Lotion for Body (2 fl oz), approximate retail value $11.09
Tanning Mitt, retail value $6
Total Value: $17.09

Bliss Soapy Suds Body Wash + Bubble Bath
Contains:
Soapy Suds (16 fl oz), retail value $18
Total Value: $18

Clean Rollerball Set
Contains:
Rain, White Woods, and Skin (3 X 0.17 fl oz), retail value $18
Total Value: $18

Josie Maran Argan Hand Healers Set
Contains:
Bare Naked Nail Wipes (20 wipes), retail value $9.00
Whipped Argan Oil Hand Cream (1 fl oz), approximate retail value $9.28
Total Value: $18.28

Buxom Havana Full-On Lipstick
Contains:
Full-On Lipstick, retail value $19
Total Value: $19

Kate Somerville Dermal Quench Liquid Lift Treatment
Contains:
Dermal Quench Liquid Lift (0.5 fl oz), approximate retail value $19
Total Value: $19

Alterna Caviar Moisture Trio
Contains:
Replenishing Moisture Shampoo (1.35 fl oz), approximate retail value $5.08
Replenishing Moisture Conditioner (1.35 fl oz), approximate retail value $5.08
Caviar CC Cream (1 fl oz), approximate retail value $10
Total Value: $20.16

Philosophy Purity Made Simple
Contains:
Facial Cleanser (12 fl oz), approximate retail value $20.50
Total Value: $20.50

Wei Pore Purifying & Brightening Collection
Contains:
1 Gingko Leaf Repairing Face Treatment Pad, approximate retail value $11.33
Royal Ming Firming and Hydrating Cream Sample (estimated 0.025 fl oz), estimated retail value $1.44
2 Containers Golden Root Purifying Mud Mask, approximate retail value $10.50
Total Value: $23.27

The Art of Shaving: The Four Elements of the Perfect Shave
Contains:
Aftershave Balm (0.5 fl oz), approximate retail value $5.88
Pre-Shave Oil (0.5 fl oz), approximate retail value $8.00
Shaving Cream (1 oz), retail value $5.00
Trial Size Badger Shaving Brush, estimated retail value $5.00
Total Value: $23.88

LORAC Fan Favorite Duo
Contains:
Eyeshadow Single (0.06 oz), retail [sale] value: $6
Waterproof Eyeliner Pencil (0.02 oz), retail value $18
Total Value: $24

Tarte Little Miracles Best Selling Essentials
Contains:
Smooth Operator Finishing Powder (0.07 oz), approximate retail value $6.34
Maracuja Oil (0.24 fl oz), approximate retail value $6.49
Lights, Camera, Lashes Mascara (0.16 oz), approximate retail value $12.67
Total Value: $25.50

Smashbox Heat Wave Lip Gloss Set
Contains:
4X Lip Enhancing Gloss (0.07 X 4), approximate retail value $26.60
Total Value: $26.60

Too Faced Better Than Sex Amazing Eyes Set
Contains:
Better Than Sex Mascara (0.17 oz), approximate retail value $14.48
Perfect Eyes Waterproof Eyeliner (0.03 oz), approximate retail value $13.50
Total Value: $27.98

bareMinerals Enchanting Eyes
Contains:
Ready Eyeshadow in the Flashback, retail value $20
PrimeTime Primer (0.05 fl oz), approximate retail value $9
Total Value: $29

Buxom Curtain Call Set
Contains:
Buxom Lash (0.2 oz), retail value $10
Buxom Full-On Lip Stick (0.03 oz), retail value $19
Total Value: $29

Bite Lush Lip Trio
Contains:
3X Lip Glosses (0.1 fl oz X 3), approximate retail value $50.77
Total Value: $50.77

My Purchase List:

My top two purchases are the Art of Shaving kit, which looks like the perfect stocking stuffer for the gentleman in my life, and the BareMinerals Enchanting Eyes Set, which is an inexpensive way of trying out the BareMinerals pressed shadows.

↧

Review: Maybelline Eye Studio Lasting Drama Gel Eyeliner

November 28, 2013, 8:58 pm

≫ Next: Is Revlon Filled With Cancer-Causing Crap? (Hint: No.)

≪ Previous: A Guide to Sephora's 2013 $10 Black Friday Deals

Gel eyeliner is a gateway drug. It's the perfect transition from wobbly, "what-the-fuck-am-I-doing" pencil liner to the smooth, crisp lines you usually associated with liquid liner. In comparison to liquid eyeliner, gel products are more forgiving and maneuverable. Maybelline gel liners are the perfect item to push wafflers over the makeup addict edge.

I have three colors: Blackest Black, Espresso, and Charcoal.

These gel eyeliners do come with brushes, and the brushes definitely aren't the worst thing in the world. They're neither too stiff nor too flexible, meaning that they are relatively easy to use. Their narrow, paddle-like shape is definitely different from a conventional eyeliner brush, but it doesn't impede use. I strongly suspect that many will prefer to use a traditional brush, regardless.

The texture of the product is very creamy, making it easy to use. If they are properly stored (upside down with a tight cap), there shouldn't be any substantial problems with them drying out or clumping.

Charcoal is a shimmery slate.

Espresso is an aptly named coffee bean brown.

Blackest black is... a pretty black black.

All three colors are intensely pigmented.

Swatches from left to right: Charcoal, Espresso, Blackest Black

I've tried a few other drugstore gel eyeliners. In comparison to Maybelline, all of them feel cheap, dry, thin, and insufficiently dark. (As a side note, I have to direct some serious eyerolls to anyone who recommends the ELF gel eyeliner as an alternative. Worst. Product. Ever.)

Maybelline Eye Studio Lasting Drama Gel Eyeliner in Charcoal on Human Face

The Maybelline Eye Studio Lasting Drama Gel Eyeliners retail for $9.99 for 0.11oz, or $90.82 per ounce. This is pretty expensive for a drugstore product, but I definitely think the price is warranted given the quality of the product. For comparison, MAC Fluidline Gel Liner retails for $16 for 0.1oz, or $160 per ounce.

↧

Is Revlon Filled With Cancer-Causing Crap? (Hint: No.)

November 30, 2013, 12:41 am

≫ Next: Review: My Pretty Zombie "Drugs Like Me" Blushes in Benzodiazepine, Fluoxetine, and MDMA

≪ Previous: Review: Maybelline Eye Studio Lasting Drama Gel Eyeliner

Let's all give a huge, collective eyeroll to the Breast Cancer Fund, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, and UltraViolet. Ready?

These advocacy groups have targeted Revlon, demanding that the cosmetics company stop producing "makeup laced with cancer-causing chemicals". Their list of suspects includes chemicals that are not used by Revlon and other chemicals that are not associated with cancer. Revlon has responded via a cease-and-desist letter, demanding that the incorrect information be removed. This, supposedly, is "bullying".

These non-governmental organizations conducted a "survey"(they just read the ingredients list on Revlon products) to find alleged cancer-causing ingredients. The list of supposedly evil chemicals ("CHEMICALS" IS A SCARY WORD, YOU GUYS) includes:

Butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA)
What it is: BHA is the name for two very similar organic compounds containing conjugated aromatic rings.

BHA
Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2-tert-Butyl-4-hydroxyanisole_and_3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole_2D.png

Why it's in your makeup: BHA is an antioxidant and preservative. Its conjugated aromatic ring is able to scoop up free radicals, preventing further damage to molecular structures. In other words, your makeup won't go rancid!
Why it's not giving you cancer: First of all, it's not causing cancer because it's not in your makeup at all. Revlon hasn't used BHA in their products for years. Secondly, although it is true that high doses of BHA do cause squamous cell carcinomas in rats and hamsters (leading the National Institutes of Health to classify it as "reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen", the doses of BHA that one is exposed to as a human are so low that they don't show up as a statistical risk factor at all. The Netherlands Cohort Study, a study of 120,852 men and woman, showed that there was no association between BHA consumption and cancer risk. This wasn't just a case of "well, it didn't quite reach statistical significance"-- there was actually a statistically non-significant decrease in cancer risk associated with increased BHA consumption. BHA is currently recognized as a generally safe food additive in low doses. Finally, all the research on BHA and cancer risk has been on dietary BHA. This is important, since BHA is used in medicines and food. However, since you don't eat your foundation, it seems pretty unlikely that it's going to give you stomach cancer.

Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)
What it is: BHT is structurally similar to BHA.


BHT Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2,6-bis%281,1-dimethylethyl%29-4-methylphenol.svg

Why it's in your makeup: Like BHA, BHT can neutralize free radicals and prevent rancidity.
Why it's not giving you cancer: BHT has studies that indicate that it is a potential carcinogen, but there are also studies showing a protective effect. Regardless, at the dosage found in cosmetics, there is no indication that any harm is caused. A toxicology review on the potential for a carcinogenic effect "concludes that the concentrations of BHA and BHT nowadays used in food, drugs and cosmetics are probably harmless." P.S. Remember that Netherlands Cohort Study? It looked at BHT, too, and also showed a statistically insignificant protective effect. And that is if you are literally eating the stuff.

Quaternium-15

Quaternium-15
Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Undefined_Quaternium-15.png

What it is: An ammonia salt.
Why it's in your makeup: Quaternium-15 is anti-microbial. It keeps the creepy-crawlies out of your mascara.
Why it's not giving you cancer: There are a couple of different claims about Quaternium-15 and their fuck-up-your-health-ability.
Claim 1- Quaternium-15 is a teratogen [an agent that causes birth defects].: This is true, but misleading. As Becker and colleagues note in the International Journal of Toxicology, "Quaternium-15 [is] an oral teratogen, but not a dermal teratogen, in rats at doses that exceeded the expected cumulative exposure from cosmetics." In other words, if you are pregnant, do not eat 25 Revlon lipsticks. Otherwise, carry on.
Claim 2- Quaternium-15 causes sensitization, increasing your likelihood of developing conditions like contact dermatitis.: This is also true, but misleading. This will only occur at high doses. Levels below 0.2% have never been shown to be sensitizing in either human or animal studies.
Claim 3- Quaternium-15 releases formaldehyde, which causes cancer. Quaternium-15 may or may not be a formaldehyde-releaser. A 2012 study in Dermatitisfound a correlation between formaldehyde-sensitivity and quaternium-15-sensitivity, but there was no predictability based on severity. The authors concluded, "Despite coreactivity with formaldehyde, quaternium-15 may not be a significant formaldehyde releaser." However, even if quaternium-15 does turn out to be a notable formaldehyde releaser, this concern will be primarily for individuals who are sensitive or allergic to formaldehyde.

Parabens

Paraben General Structure
Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paraben-2D-skeletal.png

What it is: Parabens are a class of preservatives.
Why it's in your makeup: Parabens are also antimicrobial.
Why it's not giving you cancer: I could wax poetic about parabens all fucking day, and, indeed, I already have. You can read the full post here. In summary, *Insert Raspberry Noise Here*.

Octinoxate

Octinoxate
Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Octyl_methoxycinnamate.png

What it is: An ester formed by methoxycinnamic acid and 2-ethylhexanol.
Why it's in your makeup: This sunscreen can absorb UVB rays.
Why it's not giving you cancer: I'm really struggling to find evidence that there is a notable risk to octinoxate use. Regardless, octinoxate doesn't penetrate the skin enough to be concerning. Hayden and colleagues wrote in the Journal of Skin Pharmacology and Physiology that "the human viable epidermal levels of sunscreens are too low to cause any significant toxicity to the underlying human keratinocytes."

Resorcinol

Resorcinol
Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Resorcinol.svg

What it is: A dyhydroxy benzene that is the major natural phenol in argan oil.
Why it's in your makeup: It's an antiseptic that is used in hair dye and shampoo.
Why it's not giving you cancer: To be fair, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics and their partners are not claiming that this gives you cancer, which is good, because that would be ridiculous. They're claiming it is an endocrine disruptor, which it totally is. However, there is no evidence that the levels found in shampoo (or argan oil or whatever you want to use) are sufficient to cause medical problems.

p-Phenylenediamine


p-Phenylenediamine Image Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:P-phenylenediamine.png

What it is: This is an aniline derivative that oxidizes from a white color to a darker brown.
Why it's in your makeup: p-Phenylenediamine is commonly found in hair dye. For those of you who have home-dyed your hair-- you know how the dye starts out white and then changes in color to be more reflective of the shade on the box? p-Phenylenediamine is one the ingredients that causes this color shift. Its oxidized state is a dye.
Why it's not giving you cancer: According to the EPA, p-Phenylenediamine "was not carcinogenic in a study of rats and mice exposed to the compound in the diet. Other studies have also demonstrated that p-phenylenediamine is not carcinogenic by oral or dermal exposure. " And, again, you're probably not eating your hair dye.

p-Phenylenediamine is definitely not completely risk-free, but that risk is adequately addressed by cosmetics companies. It is a contact allergen. However, if you follow the instructions on the hair dye which recommend patch-testing, this is not a significant concern.

Carbon Black

Carbon Black
Image Source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/98/Carbon_black.jpg

What it is: A color additive produced by incomplete combustion of petroleum products.
Why it's in your makeup: It's black. Sometimes you want your makeup to be black.
Why it's not giving you cancer: Carbon Black has been identified as a potential carcinogen, and was originally eliminated from cosmetics in the United States in 1976. In 2005, the FDA granted one teensy tiny exception: High purity furnace blacks are allowed up to 2.5%, subject to batch certification. Research on carbon blacks that do not take into account current US law are kind of silly, to be frank, since random-ass carbon black that factory workers are exposed to isn't exactly comparable to the samples used in modern cosmetics. Furthermore, I'm not necessarily sure that the carcinogenicity research on carbon black in general is particularly relevant to cosmetics, since all of it is based on accidental inhalation, and I generally refrain from snorting my mascara. There are no carcinogenicity studies based on topical exposure.

Is it possible that we will find sufficient evidence that the ingredients listed above are unsafe for use?
Fuck yeah, it's totally possible. However, the evidence right now suggests that they are safe.

↧

Review: My Pretty Zombie "Drugs Like Me" Blushes in Benzodiazepine, Fluoxetine, and MDMA

December 1, 2013, 1:07 am

≫ Next: Review: LORAC Sweet Temptations Natural Eyeshadow Palette Set/LORAC Eye Candy Set

≪ Previous: Is Revlon Filled With Cancer-Causing Crap? (Hint: No.)

I've previously mentioned that although indie cosmetics companies do cater to nerds, they tend to cater to a different breed of nerd, releasing fandom-type collections and the like. I'd be more prone to swooning over historical or scientific-themed collections. My Pretty Zombie has me covered on the latter fantasy with the Drugs Like Me blush collection! Slap a few skeletal formulae of psychoactive substances on some products and be still my motherfucking, neuroscience-lovin' heart!

I am not sure exactly how I feel about how everything was packed. The blushes were packaged in a box wrapped with the kind of stiff ribbon you give to small children who ruin everything they touch. Tied to the box was what I initially thought was a pepper, but which turned out to be a finger that was mysteriously painted red. The owner of My Pretty Zombie definitely has a love of "camp" that I do not share.

As much as I may protest this fact, it's clear that my buying choices can be easily manipulated by the perfect theme, and my My Pretty Zombie Drugs Like Me blushes are the quintessential example of this. I am not a recreational-drugs kind of lady, so 6-MAM and PCP don't have the same sort of special place in my heart as therapeutic drugs. If I'm being totally frank, I probably wouldn't have purchased the Benzodiazepine blush and I definitely wouldn't have purchased the Fluoxetine blush if it weren't for their awesome names. (MDMA I bought purely for the pretty color.)

I would love it if My Pretty Zombie extended their Drugs Like Me blush line to include a wider variety of therapeutic drugs. (I would buy all of them.)

The blushes are packed in square containers. Although the sifters were taped up when I originally got the blushes, it took all of about ten seconds for the sifter to be totally meaningless due to my spill-y-ness. And, since the product is easily stuck in the screwy parts on the side, I do lose a bit of product every time I open up these blushes.

From left to right: Benzodiazepine, Fluoxetine, MDMA

Like most loose powder products, you have a lot of flexibility on the level of pigmentation you get from the product. These will get you anywhere from "Why did you paint your face red?" to "You look nice today!"

Drugs Like Me Blush in Benzodiazepine

The Drug: Gamma-aminobutyric acid, or GABA, is our chief inhibitory neurotransmitter. It binds at a few different receptors, including the GABA_A receptor. When the GABA_A receptor is triggered by GABA, it hypopolarizes the neuron. You need hyperpolarization for the neuron to fire. Thus, when GABA binds to GABA_A, it makes it harder for the neuron to fire.

Benzodiazepines are a class of drugs that are referred to as GABA_A receptor ligands. When they bind to the receptor complex, they make it easier for GABA to bind by locking the receptor into a formation that binds with GABA. This means that GABA binds more frequently and you get less neuronal firing.

Behaviorally, this translates to a sedative effect that is also anxiolytic, anti-convulsant, and hypnotic. It's usually prescribed to treat anxiety, insomnia, seizures, panic disorder, and alcohol withdrawl.

The color: Benzodiazepine is a dark red with a hint of ruby sparkle. My Pretty Zombie touts that it is ideal "for that embarrassed/just got slapped look!" I actually think that description frightens away a few customers and sells the blush short. Red blush is awesome for creating a natural flush. As much as we can drone on about how "natural" conventional blushes are, no one is fucking blushing a coral color. That's just not a thing. Red blushes look like you are actually blushing.

My Pretty Zombie Drugs Like Me Benzodiazepine on Human Face

Drugs Like Me Blush in Fluoxetine

The Drug: Serotonin (5-HT) is a monoamine neurotransmitter that affects mood. One common correlate of depression is insufficient levels of one or more monoanime neurotransmitter (the other culprits include norepinephrine and dopamine).

When neurons fire into chemical synapses, they release neurotransmitter molecules in little packets called vesicles. The neurotransmitter hangs out in the synapse (the space between two neurons), where it can bind to receptors on the post-synaptic side. Once that neurotransmitter is cleared out, it stops affecting the post-synaptic neuron.

Neurotransmitters can be cleared out either by being broken down or being sucked back into the pre-synaptic neuron in a process called reuptake. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), one of the most common treatments for depression, inhibit the reuptake process. This keeps the serotonin in the synapse longer, so it can continue to stimulate the post-synaptic cell, enhancing the effect of the serotonin. For many, this can alleviate substantial symptoms of depression.

Fluoxetine (better known by its trade name: Prozac) is one of the most popular SSRIs.

The color: Fluoxetine is a muddy yellow with subtle white sparkle. My Pretty Zombie describes it as a "post it note yellow with a blue shift". "Post it note" seems apt, as long as you are talking about the dreary-colored ones we have in my office, but I'd say that claiming a "blue shift" is pushing it. No shift is evident when the blush is actually applied, and when it's swatched, it looks like a pearly white shift at best.

It's not as unwearable as one might imagine. On my cheeks, it almost picks up an orange-like color that looks a little bit like, well, blush! Still, you'd definitely have to like the "I'm coming down with a very sexy case of scurvy" look to be interested.

My Pretty Zombie Drugs Like Me Fluoxetine on Human Face

Drugs Like Me Blush in MDMA

The Drug: MDMA, frequently referred to as 'ecstasy', is an amphetamine that uses monoamine transporters to enter neurons. There, the molecules inhibit vesicular monoamine transporters, leaving high concentrations of the monoamines (serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine) in the cytoplasm. It even phosporylates the transporters, causing them to reverse direction and release even more monoamines.

Because of all these extra monoamines, users feel very positive, often experiencing mania-like symptoms. Hallucinations, derealization, and depersonalization are also common effects.

The color: MDMA is a bright pink with tons of golden shimmer. My Pretty Zombie calls it a "rosy pink with a gold afterglow", but I don't think it's rosy at all! If anything, it's tulip-y. This is the most conventionally flattering of the blushes that I tried.

My Pretty Zombie Drugs Like Me MDMA on Human Face

Overall, I'm happy with these blushes and have had a good overall experience with My Pretty Zombie! I've re-ordered from them and, although I didn't put any in my second order, I would definitely consider buying more of these blushes.

The My Pretty Zombie blushes retail for $8 for 0.12oz of product, putting them at the moderately-priced $66.67 per ounce.

↧

Review: LORAC Sweet Temptations Natural Eyeshadow Palette Set/LORAC Eye Candy Set

December 2, 2013, 7:30 pm

≫ Next: Julep December 2013 Review

≪ Previous: Review: My Pretty Zombie "Drugs Like Me" Blushes in Benzodiazepine, Fluoxetine, and MDMA

I purchased the LORAC Eye Candy Set last year, but I purchased it right as it sold out. As a result, I never reviewed it. After all, why would y'all care about a product that is no longer available for purchase? However, it has come to my attention that Kohl's is selling a new version of these palettes for 2013 under the name "Sweet Temptations Natural Eyeshadow Set". I've had a couple of people ask me about last year's version, so I decided to do a review, in case it affects your judgement of the 2013 edition.

The Eye Candy Set came with a liner and blush/lip palette that I didn't bother to include in this review, as there is no 2013 analog.

The Sweet Temptations set includes four mini eyeshadow palettes designed to look like candy bars. It's definitely one of those things where you immediately think it looks like a candy bar, but the longer you look at it, the more you think, "It... it doesn't look like a candy bar at all!" It's the visual equivalent of repeating a word until it doesn't sound like a real word anymore.

The 2012 palettes include Ooh La La Vanilla, Caramel Love Affair, Tantalizing Cocoa, and Blackberry Truffle seduction. (The 2013 versions include Indulge in White Chocolate, Satisfying Toffee Crunch, Tease Me Truffles, and Tantalizing Dark Chocolate.)

Ooh La La Vanilla

Each of the palettes flips up to reveal four pans of eyeshadow (0.0425 oz per pan) and a tiny little mirror. (You are correct in noticing that I still have the protective sheet on my mirror, as I don't really apply my eyeshadow on the go.)

This palette contains a creamy highlight that look likes cream with the tiniest splash of coffee in it, a camel that would be perfect for a mountain man's jacket if not for the shimmery, satin finish, a not-quite-matte-but-almost-matte milk chocolate color, and a dark chocolate-colored satin.

All the colors are creamy, blendable, and wearable. The texture is definitely significantly different from, say, the LORAC Pro Palette. These feel more similar to Urban Decay shadows. They're definitely buttery and pigmented, but there's a very faint, underlying grittiness to them.

Caramel Love Affair

This palette is definitely the warmest eyeshadow palette of the bunch. The highlight color is absurdly similar to the highlight in Ooh La La Vanilla. It is, perhaps, just a touch warmer than its companion. It also contains a beautiful bronze metallic, a warm, medium brown, and a muddy garnet.

This is probably my favorite palette of the bunch because it is a neutral palette that is still substantially unexpected due to the warm, red tones it contains.

Tantalizing Cocoa

Again, the highlight on this palette is strikingly similar to the previous two highlights. It is the tiniest, tiniest, you-wouldn't-even-know-it-unless-you-swatched-them-side-by-side-and-even-then-I-had-to-REALLY-look bit darker than the highlight in Ooh La La Vanilla. The palette also contains a camel color (also similar to the color in Ooh La La Vanilla, but a little brighter), a dark brown, and a black with brown shimmer and glitter.

This palette is so similar to Ooh La La Vanilla that it feels redundant. The first two colors are so similar that no one who is looking at you will be able to tell the difference (pinky promise). I prefer the Tantalizing Cocoa version, however, because I don't love mixing mattes and shimmers and because the darker shade offers more contrast.

Blackberry Truffle Seduction

This palette is substantially different from the other three palettes because it isn't filled with neutrals!

This palette contains a frosty, shimmery white, a dark, plummy purple, a blue-tinted slate, and a not-quite-matte black.

I like the fact that there is a white and a bunch of dark colors. This really facilitates drama in a way that the other palettes do not.

With that said, I had the hardest time blending the eyeshadows in this palette. They seemed to get weirdly stuck in place, meaning that it took more effort to smoke them out.

There are definitely things about this palette set that I love. The pigmentation on the shadows is beautiful. Even though the texture isn't quite as smooth as I might hope for from LORAC palettes, that's not a problem for three of the four quads (Blackberry Truffle Seduction being the exception.) Furthermore, the idea of having convenient, travel-friendly neutral options is really appealing to me. I don't want to bring an eyeshadow palette the size of a subway sandwich on a weekend trip. I brought Tantalizing Cocoa to Thanksgiving this year and I thought it was really convenient to have a complete neutral, grandma-appropriate eye in such a small container. I do suspect, however, two of these palettes will find new homes in the next couple of months: Ooh La La Vanilla is, in my opinion, redundant, and I have better eyeshadow that serves the same function as Blackberry Truffle Seduction.

The LORAC Sweet Temptations Natural Eyeshadow Palette set retails for $36 for four 0.17oz palettes, putting it at super inexpensive $52.94 per ounce. The LORAC Pro Palette, for comparison, is $42 for 0.32oz, or $131.25 per ounce.

↧

Julep December 2013 Review

December 6, 2013, 7:53 am

≫ Next: How Much Cheaper are Men's Fragrances?

≪ Previous: Review: LORAC Sweet Temptations Natural Eyeshadow Palette Set/LORAC Eye Candy Set

I upgraded my Julep box again this month. Again, I would not have chosen to do so if I didn't have the Jules (points) to do it for free. I'm super happy that I did, though, since there is not a single thing in this box that I didn't like at all. (Typically, Julep would cost $20 and an upgrade would be an additional $35 on top.)

Julep also opened up a bunch of new box options this month, presumably with the intention of luring in frequent-skippers.

The bonus item this month was a non-Julep brand name product, which totally caught me by surprise. I own a few twistbands already, although none were acquired intentionally. I thought that this was a really nice inclusion by Julep.

Julep also included a 40% off coupon (which I am totally going to use).

Nail Polish

I nail polishes that I received included:

Mia (Classic With a Twist) - A silver metallic with a slight green tint.
Cara (Bombshell) - A cross between a hot pink and a red with a frosty finish. (This is my favorite of the lot.)
Jillian (Classic With a Twist) - A rich, deep red.
Evelyn (It Girl) - Magenta cream.
Celia (It Girl) - Mermaid in nail polish form.
Shoshanna (It Girl) - A dirty-looking, greenish yellow glitter.
Misti (Boho Glam) - Blue/gray.
Joelle (Boho Glam) - A silver glitter.
Andrea (Bombshell) - A gold glitter.

I'm really excited about all of the colors. They're all really fun and unique. I think that this is the best color selection that Julep has released.

So far, I've paired Cara (opaque in one coat) and Andrea (opaque in two coats) for my first seriously-it-looks-like-the-holidays nails of the season.

Eyeshadow Palette

I didn't have very high hopes for the Julep "Sweep Eyeshadow Palette". I found the colors on the website to be really uninspiring. Furthermore, I feel that Julep doesn't really throw their energy behind all of their makeup releases, meaning that many of them are shoddy quality. After testing the palette, though, I was pleasantly surprised. The palette is certainly (in my opinion) flawed, but I feel totally comfortable endorsing the quality of the eyeshadow.

The first flaw is evident the moment you pull the palette out of its unnecessarily bulky packaging: each of the eyeshadows is teensy weensy, at 0.02 oz. That's smaller than the eyeshadows that come in Coastal Scents palettes. The total palette has a net weight of only 0.1 oz. At Julep's full-retail price of $24, that's a whopping $240 per ounce. I usually view $100 per ounce as a reasonable per-ounce eyeshadow palette price. (At the Maven price of $19.20, the eyeshadow is $192 per ounce.)

The second flaw, in my opinion, is the color scheme. The theme of this month is GLITTERATI, for fuck's sake! How could you product a color scheme that is so utterly boring?! The palest shade, Tiramisu, is too dark to be an effective highlight, and it has a weird yellow tone to it that isn't particularly flattering. If I'm doing a neutral eye, my highlight need not be twelve shades darker than my skin. The next shade, Glow, is a shimmering, neutral bronze. It's my favorite color in the palette. Dusk is the coolest shade. It's a brown with slight mauve tones. Next comes Toffee, a medium brown, and Cocoa, a very similar medium brown. I don't find the swatches on the Julep website to be true to color. I think they really emphasize the differences in the shadows. When you actually see them, though, several of the shades look very similar and are clearly redundant (my swaches below are true to color). Additionally, without a good highlight, these colors don't provide a lot of flexibility. They needed to pull out two of those three near-identical browns and replace them with a very dark brown and a pearly white highlight.

I'm also baffled by the eyeshadow names. Three of the four are dessert-themed, but "Glow" and "Dusk" are not. I kind of wish that they had embraced the "tiramisu" idea, called it the Tiramisu Palette, and named the colors accordingly. In my hypothetical improved palette, the fictional pearl could be called "Cream". What is now Tiramisu could be called "Ladyfingers". Glow could be called "Rum". We could keep Cocoa. My fictional dark color could be called "Espresso".

BAM. Superior product conceptualized.

Julep Sweep Eyeshadow Palette Swatches

The shadows themselves, though? They're fabulous. I was expecting them to be chalky and unpleasant, but they're smooth and buttery. They are, dare I say it, reminiscent of the best LORAC eyeshadows.

Julep Sweep Eyeshadow Palette on Human Face

Eyeshadow Primer

The eyeshadow primer is thick and gooey, almost like you're rubbing frosting on your face. It applies with a doe-foot applicator that is weirdly floppy.

I did a quick four-hour test using Benefit's Stay Don't Stray, a medium-performing primer, and NARS Smudgeproof (the winner of my eyeshadow primer comparison, which you can find here) as yardsticks.

From left to right, I have my control swatch, the Julep Primer, Benefit's Stay Don't Stray, and NARS Smudgeproof. I used Cocoa from the Julep Eyeshadow Palette for the test. The initial swatches showed that Julep definitely did intensify the color, but not as much as NARS. It also changed the color of the eyeshadow slightly, cooling it down.

After four hours, it was clear that Julep performed comparably to Benefit's Stay Don't Stray, meaning that it would qualify as a "medium performing" eyeshadow primer.

This is a totally adequate performance.

If you have discovered your new-found dream of being a Julep Maven subscriber, you are welcome to use my referral link here. Don't forget to use the code FREEBOX to get your first box for free!

↧

How Much Cheaper are Men's Fragrances?

December 7, 2013, 6:10 pm

≫ Next: Review: Too Faced "Joy to the Girls" Eyeshadow Palette

≪ Previous: Julep December 2013 Review

When I have window-shopped for perfumes online, I've noticed that fragrances marketed to men tend to be less pricey than their feminine counterparts. I was curious:
1. If this is a real trend and
2. If it is, how big the difference is.

I collected 128 data points off the full-price men's and women's fragrance sections from Sephora. When unisex fragrances appeared in my sample, they were included, so some fragrances appear in both lists. I consider a standard size bottle of perfume to be 1.7 fluid ounces, so, for all the following perfumes, the bottle that is closest to 1.7 fluid ounces was included.

This perfume is definitely not from Sephora. None of my perfumes are fancy.

I did not take into account the fact that women's perfumes tend to have more size options than men's perfumes. I also did not take into account the differences between eau de cologne, eau de toilette, and eau de parfum. The sample includes all fragrance concentrations. Thus, it's perfectly possible that women's fragrances contain a higher concentration of fragrance oils, which may justify or partially justify a higher price.

(I also want to add that I totally wear men's fragrances all the time and who a product is marketed towards should have no bearing on who can wear it. Wear any perfume you like, ladies and gentlemen. I refer to "men's fragrances" and "women's fragrances" merely for brevity, since "fragrances marketed towards men" is too cumbersome.)

Here's my sample:

Men's Fragrances

Hugo Boss Hugo, $75 for 5 fl oz ($15 per fl oz)
Ralph Lauren Polo Sport, $50 for 2.5 fl oz ($20 per fl oz)
Burberry Classic for Men, $70 for 3.3 fl oz ($21.21 per fl oz)
Marc Jacobs Fragrance Men, $58 for 2.5 fl oz ($23.20 per fl oz)
Ralph Lauren Polo, $61 for 2.5 fl oz ($24.40 per fl oz)
Ralph Lauren Polo Double Black, $61 for 2.5 fl oz ($24.40 per fl oz)
Ralph Lauren Polo Black, $61 for 2.5 fl oz ($24.40 per fl oz)
Ralph Lauren Polo Blue, $61 for 2.5 fl oz ($24.40 per fl oz)
Ralph Lauren Polo Red, $61 for 2.5 fl oz ($24.40 per fl oz)
Paco Ranne 1 Million Intense, $84 for 3.4 fl oz ($24.71 per fl oz)
John Varvatos Artisan, $64 for 2.5 fl oz ($25.60 per fl oz)
Calvin Klein CK One, $44 per 1.7 fl oz ($25.88 per fl oz)
Bvlgari Man, $59 for 2.0 fl oz ($29.50 per fl oz)
Lacoste Essential, $40 for 1.35 fl oz ($29.63 per fl oz)
Yves Saint Laurent L'Homme, $62 for 2 fl oz ($31 per fl oz)
Yves Saint Laurent La Nuit De L'Homme, $62 for 2 fl oz ($31 per fl oz)
Clean White Woods, $69 for 2.14 fl oz ($32.24 per fl oz)
Calvin Klein Eternity for Men $56 for 1.7 fl oz ($32.94 per fl oz)
Diesel Fuel for Life Pour Homme, $57 for 1.7 fl oz ($33.53 per fl oz)
Diesel Only the Brave, $57 for 1.7 fl oz ($33.53 per fl oz)
Versace Man Eau Fraiche, $57 for 1.7 fl oz ($33.53 per fl oz)
Carolina Herrera 212 Men, $58 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.12 per fl oz)
Givenchy Play, $58 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.12 per fl oz)
Versace Pour Homme, $58 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.12 per fl oz)
Blvgari AQVA Pour Homme, $59 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.71 per fl oz)
Blvgari Pour Homme, $59 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.71 per fl oz)
Dolce and Gabanna the One for Men, $59 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.71 per fl oz)
Givenchy Gentlemen Only, $59 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.71 per fl oz)
Gucci by Gucci Pour Homme, $59 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.71 per fl oz)
Paco Ranne 1 Million, $59 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.71 per fl oz)
Montblanc Legend, $59 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.71 per fl oz)
Burberry Brit For Men, $60 for 1.7 fl oz ($35.29 per fl oz)
Burberry Brit Rhythm, $60 for 1.7 fl oz ($35.29 per fl oz)
Burberry Touch for Men, $60 for 1.7 fl oz ($35.29 per fl oz)
Dior Fahrenheit, $60 for 1.7 fl oz ($35.29 per fl oz)
Prada Amber Pour Homme, $60 for 1.7 fl oz ($35.29 per fl oz)
Issey Miyake L'Eau d'Issey Pour Homme, $49 for 1.35 fl oz ($36.30 per fl oz)
Giorgio Armani Acqua Di Gio Pour Homme, $62 for 1.7 fl oz ($36.47 per fl oz)
Giorgio Armani Armani Code, $62 for 1.7 fl oz (36.47 per fl oz)
Gucci Guilty Black, $62 for 1.7 fl oz (36.47 per fl oz)
Prada Luna Rossa, $62 for 1.7 fl oz ($36.47 fl oz)
Versace Eros, $62 for 1.7 fl oz ($36.47 per fl oz)
Yves Saint Laurent L'Homme Intense, $75 for 2 fl oz ($37.50 per fl oz)
Acqua di Parma Blu Mediterraneo Mandorlo di Sicilia, $94 for 2.5 fl oz ($37.60 per fl oz)
Ermenegildo Zenga Uomo, $64 per 1.7 fl oz ($37.65 per fl oz)
Jean Paul Gautier Le Male, $49 for 1.3 fl oz ($37.69 per fl oz)
Fresh Cannabis Santal, $38 for 1 fl oz ($38 per fl oz)
Gucci Guilty Pour Homme, $62 for 1.6 fl oz ($38.75 per fl oz)
Gucci Made to Measure $68 for 1.7 fl oz ($40 per fl oz)
Tom Ford for Men, $72 for 1.7 fl oz ($42.35 per fl oz)
Hanae Mori HiM, $74 for 1.7 fl oz ($43.53 per fl oz)
Dolce and Gabbana Light Blue Pour Homme, $59 for 1.3 fl oz ($45.38 per fl oz)
Bvlgari Eau Parfumee White Tea, $62 for 1.33 fl oz ($46.62 per fl oz)
Hermes Terre d'Hermes, $79 for 1.6 fl oz ($49.38 per fl oz)
Viktor and Rolf Spicebomb, $85 for 1.7 fl oz ($50 per fl oz)
Acqua di Parma Colonia Intensa Oud, $180 for 3.4 fl oz ($52.94 per fl oz)
Tom Ford Gray Vetiver, $90 for 1.7 fl oz ($52.94 per fl oz)
Tom Ford Noir, $90 for 1.7 fl oz ($52.94 per fl oz)
Acqua di Parma Colonia, $91 per 1.7 fl oz ($53.53 per fl oz)
Hermes Un Jardin Sur le Toit, $92 for 1.6 fl oz ($57.50 per fl oz)
Hermes Voyage d'Hermes Eau de Toilette, $92 for 1.2 fl oz ($76.67 per fl oz)
Atelier Cologne Orange Sanguine Cologne Absolue, $80 for 1.0 fl oz ($80 per fl oz)
Atelier Cologne Vanille Insensee Cologne Absolue, $80 for 1.0 fl oz ($80 per fl oz)
Hermes Voyage d'Hermes Pure Perfume, $99 for 1.2 fl oz ($82.50 per fl oz)

Mean Price-Per-Fluid-Ounce: $38.11 per fluid ounce
Standard Deviation: $13.93

Women's Fragrances

D&G L'Imperatrice, $69 for 3.3 fl oz ($20.91 per fl oz)
Philosophy Amazing Grace, $44 for 2.0 fl oz ($22 per fl oz)
Philosophy Pure Grace, $44 for 2.0 fl oz ($22 per fl oz)
Clinique Happy, $48 for 1.7 fl oz ($28.24 per fl oz)
Katy Perry Killer Queen, $49 for 1.7 fl oz ($28.82 per fl oz)
Justin Bieber the Key, $49.50 for 1.7 fl oz ($29.12 per fl oz)
One Direction Our Moment, $49.50 for 1.7 fl oz ($29.12 per fl oz)
Clean Skin, $69 for 2.14 fl oz ($32.24 per fl oz)
Clean Warm Cotton, $69 for 2.14 fl oz ($32.24 per fl oz)
Clean White Woods, $69 for 2.14 fl oz ($32.24 per fl oz)
Daisy Eau So Fresh, $85 for 2.5 fl oz ($34 per fl oz)
Ariel Kiss the Girl Eau de Parfum, $58 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.12 per fl oz)
Kat Von D Saint, $58 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.12 per fl oz)
Kat Von D Sinner, $58 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.12 per fl oz)
LAVANILLA Pure Vanilla, $58 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.12 per fl oz)
LAVANILLA Vanilla Grapefruit, $58 for 1.7 fl oz ($34.12 per fl oz)

Jimmy Choo Jimmy Choo, $75 for 2.0 fl oz ($37.50 per fl oz)
Coach Poppy, $65 for 1.7 fl oz ($38.24 per fl oz)
Giorgio Armani Acqua Di Gioia, $65 for 1.7 fl oz ($38.24 per fl oz)
Giorgio Armani Code Pour Femme, $65 for 1.7 fl oz ($38.24 per fl oz)
Ralph Lauren Romance, $65 for 1.7 fl oz ($38.24 per fl oz)
DKNY Be Delicious $68 for 1.7 fl oz, ($40 per fl oz)
Hanae Mori Butterfly Eau de Toilette, $68 for 1.7 fl oz, ($40 per fl oz)
Dolce and Gabbana Light Blue, $69 for 1.7 fl oz ($40.59 per fl oz)
Givenchy Hot Couture, $69 for 1.7 fl oz ($40.59 per fl oz)
Givenchy Very Irresistible, $69 for 1.7 fl oz ($40.59 per fl oz)
Versace Bright Crystal, $69 for 1.7 fl oz ($40.59 per fl oz)
Boyfriend Boyfriend, $65 for 1.6 fl oz ($40.63 per fl oz)
Juicy Couture Viva La Juicy, $70 for 1.7 fl oz ($41.18 per fl oz)
Juicy Couture Viva La Juicy Noir, $70 for 1.7 fl oz ($41.18 per fl oz)
Bobbi Brown Beach Fragarence, $70 for 1.7 fl oz ($41.18 per fl oz)
Marc Jacobs Daisy, $70 for 1.7 fl oz ($41.18 per fl oz)
Marc Jacobs Dot, $72 for 1.7 fl oz ($42.35 per fl oz)
Marc Jacobs Honey, $72 for 1.7 fl oz ($42.35 per fl oz)
Dior Hypnotic Poison, $75 for 1.7 fl oz ($44.12 per fl oz)
Dior Miss Dior, $75 for 1.7 fl oz ($44.12 per fl oz)
Lancome Tresor, $75 for 1.7 fl oz ($44.12 per fl oz)
Marc Jacobs Fragrance Perfume, $76 for 1.7 fl oz ($44.71 per fl oz)
Issey Miyake L'Eau d'Issey, $72 for 1.6 fl oz ($45 per fl oz)
Stella McCartney Stella, $72 for 1.6 fl oz ($45 per fl oz)
Chloe See by Chloe, $78 for 1.7 per fl oz ($45.88 per fl oz)
Lancome La Vie Est Belle, $78 for 1.7 per fl oz ($45.88 per fl oz)
Gucci Guilty, $75 for 1.6 fl oz ($46.88 per fl oz)
Narcisso Rodriguez For Her, $77 for 1.6 fl oz ($48.13 per fl oz)
Michael Kors Michael Kors, $82 for 1.7 fl oz ($48.24 per fl oz)
Dior Addict, $82 for 1.7 fl oz ($48.24 per ounce)
Donna Karan Cashmere Mist, $82 for 1.7 fl oz ($48.24 per fl oz)
Prada Candy, $82 for 1.7 fl oz ($48.24 per fl oz)
Blvgari Omnia Crystalline, $64 for 1.3 fl oz ($49.23 per fl oz)
Marchesa Parfum D'Extase, $85 for 1.7 fl oz ($50 per fl oz)
Gucci Eau de Parfum II, $85 for 1.7 fl oz ($50 per fl oz)
Dolce and Gabbana the One, $82 for 1.6 fl oz ($51.25 per fl oz)
Dolce and Gabbana Pour Femme, $82 for 1.6 fl oz ($51.25 per fl oz)
Dior J'Adore Eau de Parfum, $90 for 1.7 fl oz ($52.94 per fl oz)
Dior Miss Dior, $90 for 1.7 fl oz ($52.94 per fl oz)
Gucci Guilty Intense, $87 for 1.6 fl oz ($54.38 per fl oz)
Chloe Eau de Parfum, $95 for 1.7 fl oz ($55.88 per fl oz)
Hanae Mori Butterfly Eau de Parfum, $95 for 1.7 fl oz ($55.88 per fl oz)
Dolce and Gabbana Pour Femme Intense, $93 for 1.6 fl oz ($58.13 per fl oz)
Balanciaga Florabotanica, $100 for 1.7 fl oz ($58.82 per fl oz)
Thierry Mugler Alien, $119 for 2 fl oz ($59.50 per fl oz)
Hermes Eau des Merveilles, $100 for 1.6 fl oz ($62.50 per fl oz)
Tom Ford Black Orchid, $110 for 1.7 fl oz ($64.71 per fl oz)
Viktor and Rolf Flowerbomb, $115 per 1.7 fl oz ($67.64 per fl oz)
Thierry Mugler Angel, $119 for 1.7 fl oz ($70 per fl oz)
Atelier Cologne Orange Sanguine Cologne Absolue, $80 for 1.0 fl oz ($80 per fl oz)

Mean Price-Per-Fluid-Ounce: $43.85 per fluid ounce
Standard Deviation: $11.56

So, to reiterate, lady-oriented perfumes are coming in at an average of $43.85 per fluid ounce and dudely perfumes at $38.11 per fluid ounce. An average-priced woman's perfume that is a standard 1.7 fluid ounces would cost $74.55. The male counterpart would cost $64.79.

The difference between these two samples is statistically significant,t(126)=2.5419, p=0.01. As it turns out, women's fragrances really do cost more, ounce-per-ounce.

↧

Review: Too Faced "Joy to the Girls" Eyeshadow Palette

December 8, 2013, 3:43 pm

≫ Next: Procter & Gamble Recieves Stern Poke Over Covergirl Mascara Ads

≪ Previous: How Much Cheaper are Men's Fragrances?

Joy to the Girls, pigmentation!
It's almost a full ounce!
All of humanity must prepare their vanities
For this holiday color fest
For this holiday color fest
For this holiday, holiday color fest.

If halfhearted Christmas carol re-writes don't get you in the eyeshadow-buying spirit, there's not much more that I can do for you.

Joy to the Girls is the 2013 Too Faced holiday release. It's a pretty large palette (it feels like you are holding a hardcover book in your hands) containing fifteen 0.06 oz eyeshadows (for a total of 0.9 oz) and a full size Lashgasm mascara, which would retail separately for $21.

The packaging is well-designed. The polka dots, which shift from silver to gold depending on how you hold the product, aren't very Christmasy, but they're super pretty. The pattern was designed by Mary McDonald, an interior decorator. (If you like, you can drool over her portfolio by clicking here.)

The palette is held shut by a magnetic clasp.

Like most Too Faced palettes, the eyeshadow comes with some diagrams for inspiration. In this one, it's printed on the inside of the cover. I would have preferred that this was a separate card that I could just throw away (leaving me with more pretty polka dots!), but it's not a big deal. It's also worth noting that there is no mirror on this palette. I don't care, but I'm sure that some of you do.

Each of the eyeshadows has a Christmas-themed name (as long as you're pretty broad about what constitutes "Christmas-Themed").

The quality of the eyeshadows is a bit variable. Some of them are unbelievable and some are kind of unimpressive. The majority of them are relatively nice, if a bit powdery.

From left to right: Cookie Dough, Cheers!, Prancer

Cookie Dough is a warm light brown that's a bit reminiscent of Bambi. It's not quite matte, but it's mostly matte.

Cheers! is a shimmery champagne that is similar in both color and texture to Urban Decay's Sin and Stila's Kitten, although it's not a dupe for either.

Prancer is a copper sparkle. In my opinion, it's the weakest eyeshadow in the bunch. The texture is powdery and gritty at the same time and it's very sheer. I'm sure that it is possible to build this up to opacity with the right primer and white base, but it won't be effortless.

From left to right: Sugar Plum, Mulberry, Snow Angel

Sugar Plum is a shimmery dusty purple color.

Mulberry is a cool taupe color with some seriously purple undertones.

Snow Angel is a matte ivory. I found it difficult to build up pigmentation for this color.

From left to right: Powdered Sugar, Too-Too, Yule Log

Powdered Sugar is a very pale baby pink with a super powdery texture. (So, you know. An appropriate name.) The pigmentation isn't too bad, but it's hard to tell from my swatches since it is very similar to the color of my skin.

Too-Too is a ballerina pink with finely-milled white and rainbow glitter.

Yule Log is a deep, warm brown with bronze and red glitter.

From left to right: Chestnut, Twinkle, Joy

Chestnut is a milk chocolate with a satin finish.

Twinkle is my absolute favorite of the bunch. It's a brassy gold with fabulous color payoff and an easy-to-work with texture. Plus, seriously, look at that color. It screams"happy holidays"!

Joy is a frosty baby blue. This is another one where both the color payoff and texture was downright impressive.

From left to right: Spike the Punch, Chimney, Coal

Spike the Punch is a light peach with white sparkle. It takes a bit of building to get the color payoff you might hope for.

Chimney is a slate gray satin. It's also a standout!

Coal is a matte black. The product is fine, but I have other matte blacks that are much more intense and easy to work with. It was a good addition to the palette, but you do have to work to get opacity. It's not anything to write home about!

I'm not going to do a full review of the LashGasm mascara at the present time, but I figured that I would at least note that I really, really didn't like it. It found it hard to work with and prone to creating spider-leg eyelashes. To me, the inclusion of a LashGasm mascara did not add value to my purchase.

I think that the overall color scheme for this palette is really holiday-appropriate. The neutrals are visiting-grandma-appropriate without being boring, and I love that there are a few bold colors, such as Twinkle, to glam it up when you want to. I do think that the palette would have been improved if one of the off-white mattes had been shimmery and if Prancer had been replaced by a statement color that had better quality. A burgundy color, for example, might have been a good choice.

Here are a few of the looks that I've done with the Joy to the Girls palette:

The Joy to the Girls Eyeshadow Palette retails for $46. If you assume that the $21 for the mascara is a valid price (e.g. you would have bought it separately), the eyeshadow is $25 for 0.9 oz, leaving you with a price per ounce of $27.78. That is a downright drugstore-esque price. (For comparison, Wet'n'Wild trios cost $24.92 per ounce.)

Alternatively, you can view the mascara as a bonus and not count it. $46 for 0.9 oz of eyeshadow comes out to $51.11 per ounce, which I view as quite low. I typically think of anything less than $100 per ounce as a relatively reasonable price.

↧

Procter & Gamble Recieves Stern Poke Over Covergirl Mascara Ads

December 10, 2013, 12:00 am

≫ Next: Bourjois Faux and Fabulous Lady in Black False Lashes

≪ Previous: Review: Too Faced "Joy to the Girls" Eyeshadow Palette

Oh, lash inserts. When combined with photoshop, it seems like you don't even need the mascara in question to make a mascara ad.

After innumerable mascara advertizements that look something like this...

That doesn't even look like mascara. Like, seriously. Look at that.
Source: http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/fashion/covergirl-model-wears-false-eyelashes-mascara-ad-fine-print-reveals-lash-inserts-article-1.127069

...the National Advertising Division has decided that using false eyelashes is probably not the fairest way to sell a damn mascara. Their current target is Procter & Gamble (owner of Covergirl Cosmetics)'s Clump Crusher Mascara ads, which, like countless ads before it, use lash inserts to deceive consumers about its product's lash-enhancing prowess.

The National Advertising Division (NAD) is a segment of the the Council of Better Business Bureaus dedicated to reviewing factual claims made by national ads. The Better Business Bureau (BBB) itself is a nonprofit in the US and Canada that investigates the reliability of various businesses. They rate businesses on a scale from F to A+. I tend to not trust their ratings indiscriminately because I've observed that the ratings seem to depend in large part on the company's participation with BBB, rather than their overall reliability. For example, according to the rating explanations on their website, the non-profit docks companies for not using the BBB website to respond to complaints. There have also been allegations that BBB ratings are sensitive to whether or not companies give money to the non-profit. (You can read more about that by clicking here. The article gets bonus points since you have now seen inappropriate pictures of one of the key players that it discusses.) With that said, I do think that the BBB is one tool that you can you to help determine the sketchiness of a company.

NAD can give companies stern warnings about their national advertizing campaigns, but the council doesn't exactly have teeth. Rather, it's a self-regulatory system where companies can choose whether they want to follow the rulings. Companies choose to participate as a way to avoid litigation. According to the BBB website, "Product performance claims, superiority claims against competitive products and all kinds of scientific and technical claims in national advertising are the types of cases accepted by the NAD."

The NAD ruled that using lash inserts in a mascara commercial qualified as a false product demonstration. Although they felt that Procter & Gamble had support for their direct claims (E.g. "200% more volume"), they considered that the ad implied claims that could not be backed up (E.g. "Consumers who use Clump Crusher mascara would get lashes like those depicted in the advertisement [and] the lashes depicted in the photograph were achieved solely by using Clump Crusher mascara.")

Though the Covergirl ads have a teensy weensy little asterisk at the bottom letting consumers know about the lash inserts, NAD said that this wasn't good enough. The information about lash inserts must be contained in the main body of the ad, they said, or lash inserts must be discontinued entirely. Procter & Gamble has agreed to these terms. It will be interesting to see whether or not this changes anything about future mascara ads.

Personally, I'm really curious about the general efficacy of these types of ads. Clearly, even the knowledge that an ad has been doctored doesn't immunize viewers from its power. However, I just don't find mascara ads like this to be compelling:

L'Oreal doesn't know what eyelashes look like.
Source: http://shoeperduper.wordpress.com/2012/05/24/a-mascara-advert-filmed-without-lash-inserts-well-thats-novel/

Suspending my disbelief about those lashes is even harder than suspending my disbelief during movies about poltergeists.

I was especially surprised that Clump Crusher was the problem product given how much praise it has received based solely on its merits. Last year this post on reddit.com/r/makeupaddiction by theKittenButcher, titled "Covergirl's new Clump Crusher mascara is no joke. While playing around with New Year's Eve looks tonight, I tried it out for the first time. This is after four coats. I didn't even need a lash comb." triggered a huge Clump Crusher trend on the subreddit:

Source: http://www.reddit.com/r/MakeupAddiction/comments/15p88x/covergirls_new_clump_crusher_mascara_is_no_joke/

It's possible that reason that this is effective is because the source isn't Covergirl's marketing team. It's also possible that there is a difference between what is effective for hardcore makeup lovers and what's effective for random drugstore browsers (and that Covergirl is appealing to the latter). Still, I feel that super-awesome-but-not-magic-or-impossible depictions of makeup are more powerful for me, personally, when I'm choosing products.

If I ran a makeup company, I would want to explore that kind of ad. For example, you could pick out a model who has naturally long, blonde eyelashes (the kind that you can't really see sans mascara) and just do a video of her actually putting on the damn mascara. I think that would capture the attention and excitement of people who actually want a product that works.

Pictures of lash inserts masquerading as mascara, on the other hand? Yawn.

↧

Bourjois Faux and Fabulous Lady in Black False Lashes

December 11, 2013, 9:15 pm

≫ Next: Wantable December 2013 Review

≪ Previous: Procter & Gamble Recieves Stern Poke Over Covergirl Mascara Ads

The first time I tried to use false eyelashes on my own*, it was not a success. I used globs of glue. I forgot to wait for it to get tacky. I glued my eyes together and ripped out several eyelashes trying to pry my lids apart.

The second time I tried to use false eyelashes on my own, I used half lashes. Half lashes are near-foolproof.

Fancy half eyelashes, like the Bourjois Faux and Fabulous Lady in Black Falsies, are near-foolproof and also fancy.

The Lady in Black falsies have three distinct 'juts' of lash, with four studs on each eye. These rest upon a thick, rectangular band at the base of the lashes.

They also come with a lash adhesive, which I skipped because the lashes are too pretty to waste on lash adhesive that I'm not familiar with.

I was really surprised (and a bit disappointed) by how utterly wearable these falsies are. Although the jewels are visible, they're not visible when the eye is open. The unique shape blends into my real lashes. It doesn't look natural, per se, but it doesn't have the highly stylized look that I was hoping for. Even the thick black band was easily camouflaged by my makeup (and I didn't even wear eyeliner!).

I'm not happy with this mascara, but it's no fault of the falsies.

Excessive wearability issues aside, these are some of my favorite false eyelashes right now. I especially like them for a casual office environment. It feels like you are sneaking in glam jewels on your face under everyone's noses.

The Bourjois Faux and Fabulous Lady in Black Falsies retail for $14.50 USD. This is actually pretty darn pricey for drugstore falsies. MAC Falsies are $16, a mere $1.50 more than the Bourjois set. However, since I am unaware of a similar set of lashes that are available for a cheaper price, I would argue that this is worth the price for anyone enamored by their pulchritudinousness.

*I clarified "on my own" as makeup artists had adorned my lashes without incident.

↧

Wantable December 2013 Review

December 13, 2013, 10:19 am

≫ Next: Review: Urban Decay Naked3 Eyeshadow Palette

≪ Previous: Bourjois Faux and Fabulous Lady in Black False Lashes

Do you have a friend who just takes everything you say super literally?

I feel like Wantable is the beauty subscription box version of that friend. They're very sensitive to your stated preferences, but I feel like they don't have a person sitting down and saying, "Okay, this is what they like, how can we create value?" Instead you get Wantable-Bot, who hears you don't mind brow gel and buys you one ludicrously-priced brow gel product and an anti-aging sample and calls it good.

With that said, I'm pretty happy with my December box. I'm gradually weeding out the things I'm consistently not impressed by. If you choose to subscribe to Wantable, I recommend being as picky as you possibly can in your preferences survey, as that will avoid a lot of disappointments.

Here's what I received this month:

Manna Kadar Sheer Glo Shimmer Lotion Highlight (full size at 1.0 oz), retail value $29

This product is a light pink liquid that imparts a soft glow. Although the internet machine recommends that I mix this with my foundation, I didn't find that to be effective. All it did was sheer out my foundation; it didn't affect the finish. I do really like it, though, as a subtle highlighter. Even on my pale-ass face, the pink color isn't too pigmented or clownish. It gives a spectacular finish that looks almost supermodel-esque.

The downside? I have no fucking idea what color this product is. It isn't labeled anywhere. Online, you can buy it in "Movie Star", "Paradise", and the Birchbox-exclusive "Birchbox Love" and none of those look quite right. It looks closest to "Paradise", but Paradise seems to have a golden hue that isn't present here. I think that keeping quiet about the color is a ridiculous choice. There are two reasons you would discount a product for a beauty box: you want the person you send it to to buy it and/or you want them to tell other people to buy it. If you don't make it clear what the product is, neither of those things can happen.

One pump is WAY too much product, though. Whoops.

Eveline Cosmetics Eyeliner Marker in Deep Black (full size), retail value $7.99

This is a nice, easy-to-use eyeliner pen. Before I checked out the price (I always use stuff before I look up the value), I was certain that it was going to lean on the pricey side. To my surprise, it's currently on sale for a wallet-friendly $7.99. Although I'm not thrilled about being sent a product that is on sale, I do like this eyeliner a lot.

The point on the pen is nice and precise, making it easy to work with. It's a lovely, true black. The formula on the liner itself is pretty great (I drew a picture on my hand and it was fine in the bathtub until I started rubbing it, at which point it smudged. I speculate that it would probably last through watery eyes, but not full-on ugly crying). I think this is really impressive for $7.99. It's a drugstore pricepoint but it's leaps and bounds above the drugstore eyeliner pens that I have tried.

La Bella Donna Love Lips Collection Duo Lip Crayon in Luscious (full size at 0.145oz), retail value $27

This a double-ended lip liner and lip pencil. The liner side has the texture of a traditional pencil lip liner, so it's a bit tougher than I might have wished for, but it's totally usable. The lip pencil side is very soft, but it's a bit sheerer, with tons of glitter.

The liner side is a rich, dusty medium-dark red that leans warm. The pencil is the sheerer, shimmery glitter-bomb version of the same color.

Based on the swatches, I wasn't in love. As soon as I put it on my lips, though, I changed my tune. Having a lip liner/lip pencil duo is really convenient and the color doesn't look frosty or immature when applied. It looks pretty and has good lasting power.

Billion Dollar Brows Clear Brow Gel (full size at 0.1fl oz), retail value $16

To the best of my knowledge, all clear brow gels are functionally identical. I have never had a clear brow gel and thought, "Wow, this is so much better than that other clear brow gel!" Thus, it's hard to conclude that this brow gel is going to give me $16 of value. The only thing it's really got is pretty packaging. (And even that is non-ideal-- I put brow gel on after I fill in my brows. As a result, my brow gels get murky quickly. Since it looks nasty, I'd always prefer to have opaque brow gel packaging.)

Still, I totally needed a new clear brow gel, so it's hard to complain.

Victoria Soap Lanolin Eggwhite Facial Soap (0.53oz), approximate retail value $1.49

I don't have much to say about this soap. It's a facial soap. If you put it on your face, your face with be cleaner. The end.

Total Box Value: $81.48

Here's a look I created with all the products in my December 2013 Wantable box:

Overall, I like every product that I received and I'm pretty darn happy. My criticisms are mostly nitpicky, but I feel that this is reasonable when reviewing a subscription service that costs $36. (That's a fair bit of money given that you aren't choosing your own products!)

I'm going to continue to refine my likes/dislikes survey. It's hard to say you don't like things that you totally do like, but the pickier that I have been on the survey, the happier that I have been with my boxes.

If you do decide to join Wantable, you are always welcome to use my referral link by clicking here.

↧

Review: Urban Decay Naked3 Eyeshadow Palette

December 16, 2013, 8:53 pm

≫ Next: Birchbox December 2013 Review

≪ Previous: Wantable December 2013 Review

Regular readers already know that I am not one to swoon over Urban Decay eyeshadows. Their weird, grainy texture and their acceptable-but-not-excellent color payoff leaves me a little baffled as to why they are considered the creme de la creme of eyeshadow among otherwise perfectly scrutinizing makeup lovers.

Still, when the Naked3 palette was announced, I was swept up in the craze. It's pink. It's pink, you guys. Pink and brown. Those are my colors. I can wear them to work. I paint my face with them and pretend I am a fairy princess. And three is my lucky number. Surely, if it wasn't fate, it was at least serendipity.

I wish so badly that this was a story about how the Naked3 palette is the best eyeshadow that Urban Decay has ever produced. I wanted it to be good. I did spend my money on it, after all.

But, you guys... it's just not very good. It's not awful, but it's yawn-inducingly mediocre.

The packaging is totally fine; the metal tin is a rosy bronze with a wavy pattern that is reminiscent of what happens when you are reading in the bath, accidentally let water splash on your book, and then let it dry.

There's a big fatty mirror and twelve 0.05oz eyeshadows that are arranged in some approximation of lightest to darkest. There's also a double ended brush.

Strange is a matte almost-white-but-not-quite with a dash of pink thrown in. I have noticed that it is very difficult for even top-notch eyeshadow companies to make really lovely matte whites, so I usually don't have very high expectations for them. Strange is totally fine, but it leans on the powdery side and, as a result, it takes a lot of layers for the eyeshadow to actually stay. I feel like I apply it and it kind of drifts off my eye and I have to keep building and building to get some good color. For a matte white, it's perfectly okay. It's certainly no "Tako by Sugarpill", though!

Dust is the shade in this palette that actually makes me mad. I have no idea what the fuck is going on with this shade. It has the texture of cornflakes. You don't swatch this color-- you chip at it and hope some of the hunks land somewhere near your eye. It's a pale pink metallic that looks all kinds of gorgeous in the pan... until you actually swatch it. Then it looks like your eyeshadow contracted a skin condition. (Seriously. Scroll up and look at that picture.) What's more, 99.99% of that random eyeshadow dust adorning my pictures came from Dust. I would say, then, that "Dust" is an appropriate name, but at least dust is smooth. On top of that, it's not even pigmented.

I would be a little less angry if this was a color I wasn't actively excited about. If this was some random brown, I would be okay. But, as it is, I'm seriously pissed that someone from Urban Decay thought that this was an appropriate level of quality. I can just picture them throwing up their hands and going, "Eh, good enough!"

Burnout is a pearly peach with totally acceptable color payoff.

Limit is probably the best shade in the palette in terms of pure eyeshadow quality. This mauve-y dusty rose is rich, pigmented, and easily blended.

Buzz is a frosty dark rose color. It leans pretty metallic, but, despite the disasters found in the other metallics in this palette, it's got pretty nice color payoff and no more fallout than what you kind of expect when you choose Urban Decay as your brand.

Trick is a frosty copper. It's got decent color payoff, but it's also got some of the weird texture problems that Dust has, just to a lesser extent. This is such a bizarre flaw; I've never used eyeshadow with this problem before.

Swatches from left to right: Strange, Dust, Burnout, Limit, Buzz, Trick

The darker shades have more consistent quality, but they are less exciting.

Nooner is a warm, medium-brown matte. (This one is also pretty lovely in terms of quality.)

Liar is a medium brown with a frosty finish.

Factory is a warm dark brown with a satin finish.

Mugshot is a frosty, metallic taupe.

Darkside is a purple-ish brown with a satin finish.

Blackheart is a dark brown not-quite-black with red glitter.

Swatches from left to right: Nooner, Liar, Factory, Mugshot, Darkside, Blackheart

Although the darker shades were all pretty acceptable, I didn't buy the palette for the darker shades. Hell, if I could have bought the lighter six shades separately, I would have done so in a heartbeat. Unfortunately, the quality on those was inconsistent, with some (Dust) having truly atrocious quality.

The double ended brush looks gorgeous, but it's not particularly functional. The synthetic bristles are so smooth that they feel borderline greasy, which isn't necessarily a flaw, but it was not my favorite feature. One side is definitely a "pack on the shadow" brush, although its ability to do so is only so-so. The other, though, I have no idea. It's not fluffy enough to be a blending brush. (Trust me, it blends like crap.) It won't pack on shadow. It can't do anything precise. So... why is it there...?

Urban Decay also included four samples of four of their eyeshadow primers: the Original, Eden, Sin, and their Anti-Aging Primer. I've tested the efficacy of the Urban Decay Primer Potions here, and they're fine but... definitely not the best thing on the market.

Urban Decay states that each sample contains a week's worth of primer. I actually think it's a great deal more than that. They didn't label how big the samples were, but, comparing them to other samples that I have, I'd guesstimate that each contains around 0.05 fl oz of primer. The total, then, would add up to 0.2 fl oz of primer. That's a lot-- a full size tube of Primer Potion is 0.37 fl oz for $24, putting the estimated retail value on these samples at around $12.97. My biggest concern with these would be preventing the samples from drying up!

Here are a few looks I have created using the Naked 3 palette:

This is what happens when you bronze the fuck out of my face.

Putting aside the value of the brush and the eyeshadow primer, this palette costs $52 for 0.6 oz of eyeshadow, putting it at $86.67 per ounce. That's a very reasonable price.

The reason that I am so frustrated with this palette is because the shades that kind of sucked were the shades that had enticed me to shell out my money. If you look at those shades and think, "Eh, I could take 'em or leave 'em", you probably won't be crying your heart out over your decision to make a purchase. Hell, the mattes (used in the first look above) are actually pretty great and plenty of the shadows are just fine. Personally, though, I'm pretty bummed.

↧

Birchbox December 2013 Review

December 18, 2013, 9:34 pm

≫ Next: Ipsy December 2013 Review

≪ Previous: Review: Urban Decay Naked3 Eyeshadow Palette

Sometimes, a beauty box is filled with fabulous goodies that fill you with joy and seasonally appropriate cheer. Other times, it's a beauty blogger nightmare that is so boring that it's difficult to even say anything about it.

This is a story about the latter scenario. Y'all are lucky you didn't get a blank page and a shrug.

Here's what I got:

FusionBeauty Lash Fusion XL (0.28 oz), approximate retail value $16.00

I was already giving this product a little of side-eye before I tried it, since it's not-exactly-stunning two out of five star average review is enough to raise a few eyebrows.

Sure enough, this mascara is a flop. Except, you know, flops have drama. The most hilarious part about this mascara, to me, is Birchbox's rather banal claim that "You’ll only need one coat for long, glamorous lashes." This is just blatantly false. A single coat of this mascara is invisible. If you reeeally coat on that dry-as-hell formula, you can get some very natural looking lashes. Whoever labeled this "XL" needs a new size chart.

The one thing I will say about this mascara is that it would be a good choice for anyone who goes head-over-heels for the "no makeup makeup" look. Unsubtle mascara and glossy lips are the two things that most easily ruin the makeup-free illusion. This product won't betray you there.

Before Mascara:

After Mascara:

Benta Berry G1 Exfoliating Facial Cleanser (0.1 fl oz), approximate retail value $1.60

This... is... a facewash. You can wash your face with it. I have literally nothing of note to say about it. It's exfoliate-y. If you put it in drugstore packaging and told me it cost $3, I would believe you.

Dr. Lipp Original Nipple Balm for Lips (0.1 fl oz), approximate retail value $2.90

If you have ever pet a sheep, you are familiar with the feeling on lanolin, a secretion from wool-producing livestock comprised mostly of waxy esters. Dr. Lipp's Nipple Balm is just a big tube of lanolin.

As the product name suggests, lanolin is frequently used to soothe the sore nipples of breastfeeding mothers. (Dr. Lipp is really embracing the "nipple" theme by adorning their website with drawings of pin-up girls patting a small doctor-man on the head.) On your lips, it works as an emollient.

Even though the ingredients are different, I found it striking how similar this product felt to a tube of Carmex with the word "nipple" on the front. (Carmex usually includes lanolin as the fourth ingredient.)

Styled by Hayadi Pure Happy Smooth (1 fl oz), approximate retail value $4.38

I have no idea what this product is. Is it a heat protectant? Well, it doesn't have any of the ingredients that heat protectants have... (For more about the science of heat protectants, click here.) It's got keratin in it, but that means absolutely nothing. You might be able to use it for styling, but, given that I style my hair literally never, that's not very helpful. Birchbox is calling this a "hair lotion", but I have no idea what that even means.

It smells kinda nice, so I guess there's that...?

Emily's Chocolates Chocolate Covered Fortune Cookies (1), approximate retail value $1.00

This was definitely my favorite thing in this box (not that it had a shitload of competition). Although it's not an intuitive combination, the milk chocolate plus fortune cookie pairing is basically brilliant. I will probably throw in a few of these the next time I make an order from the Birchbox shop.

I seriously doubt they'll last very long, though.

...in bed.

Total Box Value: $25.88

...meh.

If you are inexplicably struck with a desire to subscribe to Birchbox, you are always invited to use my referral link by clicking here.

↧

Ipsy December 2013 Review

December 21, 2013, 3:28 pm

≫ Next: How Does Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy Affect Your Loose Eyeshadows?

≪ Previous: Birchbox December 2013 Review

I wanted to start this post with a brief apology about my incredibly sporadic posting over the last couple of weeks. I've been drowning in work a bit and have been too tired to come home and do a lot of writing. I am never particularly good at meeting my goal of one post per day (in fact, I'm laughably bad at it), but I usually do a little better than this.

This is one of those rare occasions where I actually really like bag that Ipsy came in! After months of weird, tacky anchors and plain plastic purses, I'm quite excited about the cute little rows of squares and black patent finish.

Here's what I got this month:

Pop Beauty Bright Up Your Life Trio in Smokin' Hot (0.15oz), approximate retail value $7.20

PopBeauty is my makeup brand arch-nemesis. I have hated everything that I have ever tried from them. Or, at very least, I did until I tried this trio. To be clear, I would never purchase the full sized version of this palette. It's not ridiculously expensive at $24, but the shadows feel like something you wouldn't be shocked to get from the drugstore. They're powdery and you have to build 'em up to get the pigmentation you want. However, I realized as soon as I got this trio that I am woefully understocked on gray eyeshadow. I don't have any colors like this.

The trio contains a frosty eggshell with white glitter, a graphite-reminiscent silver with white glitter, and an almost-black-but-not-quite with white and blue glitter.

The pigmentation is totally usable (HIGH PRAISE, I KNOW).

Be a Bombshell The One Stick in Flustered (full size at 0.26oz), retail value $16

I always have to raise my eyebrow at multi-use products. I feel that a lip/cheek dual-use product will always pale in comparison to a quality lip product and a quality cheek product. This isn't an exception. According to the Be a Bombshell website, you can apply 'The One Stick'"to eyelids, cheeks or lips for the perfect pop of color anywhere!". I'm not even going to show you the greasy mess that happened when I tried to apply this to my eyes, so I'll talk exclusively about cheek and lip application, since the person who said you can put it on your eyes clearly had no idea what they were talking about.

"Flustered" is a warm red with pink glitter. It's more vibrant than something that I would have picked out for myself, but it's still fairly wearable on my cheeks with a shitload of blending.

On my lips, this product feels greasy, almost like I covered my mouth in greasepaint. It's also fairly sheer on the lips, adding just a hint of color.

Unblended Swatch

Blended Swatch

I think I would have really liked this product as a cream blush if I had gotten a different shade. As it is, it kind of looks like I have a sunburn when I wear it. Unfortunately, it's been my experience that colors on the Be A Bombshell website are atrociously off, so I don't feel confident making a purchase sight unseen.

It's also worth noting, if you do consider purchasing a full size for this, that 0.26oz is pretty small for this sort of item. $16 for 0.26oz is $61.54 per ounce, which certainly doesn't sound bad. However, NARS's the Multiple is a full 0.5oz. At $39, that's a hardly-more-expensive $78 per ounce. But, like... you get NARS. (If you don't intend to use it up, though, obviously it's better to stick with the cheaper option.)

NYX Extra Creamy Round Lipstick in Iris (full size at 0.14 oz), retail value $4.00

I love NYX. I really do.

...But this lipstick is horrid.

When you are talking about a makeup product being a "peach" color, that has a specific meaning and that meaning doesn't necessarily have anything to do with real peaches that you actually eat in real life. If I called this a peach, I would be talking about the color you get when you open up a peach in the summer, and you have golden fruit inside. ...Now, imagine that the golden fruit was frosty.

I am not normally one to shun lipstick colors. I'll happily wear purple, blue, black, or orange. This color, though, is just not flattering on me. If it was really, really opaque, and applied smoothly, it would be wearable. Sadly, the formula is thin and you can see my actual lip color poking through. That plus the color is an awful combination. It just looks like I have a disease and really chapped lips at the same time.

Nicka K New York Nail Color in ??? (full size at 0.5 fl oz), retail value $4.99

This nail polish was not labeled, so I can't tell you what color is. If you love it and want to buy it, too bad for you. It's a gorgeous cherry red.

Signature by English Laundry Pour Homme (estimated 0.27 fl oz) and Pour Femme (estimated 0.27 fl oz), estimated retail value $22.87

As you can see by my perfume-soaked cardboard container, the dudely version of this perfume unscrewed itself and leaked all over my ipsy bag in transit. Only a tiny bit remained. (It's possible that the lady version was also a little leaky, since the bottle sure wasn't full.)

The "Pour Homme" version smells kind of woody and musky, whereas the "Pour Femme" version smells like generic white flowers. I had a hard time picking out any specific notes, which might be because I have a terrible sense of smell (literally today, the building next to us caught fire and my boyfriend asked, "Do you smell something burning?" and I was like, "No..."), but I suspect it's because they are pretty boring. I find it deliciously ironic that a perfume called "Signature" is boring as hell.

Happily, these are pretty darn large for perfume samples. The sizes weren't labeled, but since the bottles were exactly the same size as a Julep nail polish, I feel pretty comfortable in my size estimation.

Bonus: BeautyBlender (1), retail value $19.95 and BeautyBlender BlenderCleanser (estimated 0.5 fl oz), estimated retail value $1.50

This was a reward for making referrals, not an official part of my Ipsy bag. I redeemed 1000 Ipsy points to receive this item. I already like beautyblenders, so I was happy to snatch up a new freebie, especially given that Ipsy generally sends out bonuses that aren't exactly exciting.

Total Box Value: $55.06 not including bonus, $76.51 including bonus

Here's a look I created using the items in my December Ipsy:

These aren't colors that I would have put together on my own!

And here is the exact same look, except I subbed out the NYX lipstick for the Be a Bombshell "The One" stick:

Overall, I feel this box had a lot of "almost but not quite" in it. For example, I would have liked "the One" stick... if I'd gotten a different color. Ditto for the NYX lipstick. I loved the giant perfume sample from English Laundry, but the smell was a bit of a snoozefest. The Nicka K nail polish was lovely, but they didn't bother to tell me what color it was. I wouldn't have needed all of these things to be changed to be happy with this box, but a couple changes would have moved my feelings all the way from "moderately happy given that this subscription box only cost $10 a month" to "generally ecstatic".

If you are interested in joining Ipsy, you're always welcome to use my referral link by clicking here.

↧

How Does Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy Affect Your Loose Eyeshadows?

December 21, 2013, 8:48 pm

≫ Next: Review: Sephora Cream Lip Stains in Endless Purple, Strawberry Kissed, and Classic Beige

≪ Previous: Ipsy December 2013 Review

Add this to the list of products that I feel like a dick for not recommending sooner, since I've been using it since August-or-so and it's one of the biggest helpers in my collection.

According to the Fyrinnae website, "This is not an eye shadow primer, or really a base. It is to keep sparkles on and/or to make shimmery shadows appear 'glossy': a foiled look without foiling."

The product comes in a 10ml tube and it contains 9ml (0.3 fl oz) of product. The full size retails for $7.00, meaning that it comes out to a very budget-friendly $23.33 per fluid oz. (If it's not sinking in how cheap that shit is, check out my drugstore eyeshadow primer mega-comparison here. Pixie Epoxy is cheaper than a full 80% of drugstore eyeshadow primers.) You can also buy a 1.5ml/0.05 fl oz sample for $2, which is $40 per ounce.

The product is sticky as fuck. You apply it using a doe-foot applicator. (Personally, I usually dab a little bit on my finger and rub it over my eyelid.)

Because it is so sticky, it doesn't work well, in my experience, with pressed eyeshadows. All that the combination does is gunk up my brush. I also haven't had good experiences with Pixie Epoxy under matte eyeshadows-- I get weirdass clumping. Under glitterbombs, though, it's basically magic.

Although my anecdotal evidence said "HOLYSHITTHISISAWESOME", I decided to test how Pixie Epoxy holds up over time.

For my test eyeshadow, I used another Fyrinnae product-- their Conjuror eyeshadow, a brick red with an aqua shift.

My camera doesn't believe in taking close-ups.

I also used a fabulous traditional eyeshadow primer as a comparison. I chose NARS Smudgeproof, since it was primer that came out on top in my eyeshadow primer mega-comparison earlier this year.

I had four swatches:

From left to right: Control, NARS Smudgeproof only, Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy only, NARS Smudegproof + Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy

The first swatch was a control swatch, with no eyeshadow primer of any kind underneath. The second was a swatch over NARS Smudgeproof. As you can see, the color was definitely intensified. It still looks like the same product, though: a brick red with some glitter. The third swatch, though, is where the magic happens! Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy completely transforms the color of the eyeshadow. The aqua color, which looked like random, disorganized glitter in the previous two swatches, looks like an icy oil slick over the red base. (I should note-- that weird delineation on the left side of this swatch is where the Pixie Epoxy ended. It's nothing weird, I just have bad aim.) Finally, I used NARS Smudgeproof as the primer and stuck Pixie Epoxy on top. Although the aqua shift was clearer than it was in the first two swatches, there was definitely something lost. (This was a bummer to see, since this is the application method that I usually choose.)

Then, I waited four hours.

From left to right: Control, NARS Smudgeproof only, Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy only, NARS Smudegproof + Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy

It should come as no surprise to loose eyeshadow fans that the control swatch was basically gone at the end of those four hours. The other three, though, all held up super well. I was expecting that the traditional primer + Pixie Epoxy together would be the best-lasting combo, but I didn't see any added benefit when they were used in synchronization. Pixie Epoxy unequivocally not only changed the effect of the eyeshadow; it helped it last, as well.

Since then, I have been playing around with Pixie Epoxy by itself, as opposed to using it in combination with another primer. I have to say-- I'm not seeing a difference. This is good news for those of you who want to skip an eyeshadow step. Fyrinnae may claim that this isn't an eyeshadow primer, but it sure as hell does the job. (One important caveat to this: if you use your eyeshadow primer to prevent creasing, you may want to do your own testing on your actual eyelids. I have never had a problem with eyeshadow creasing, so I just can't speak to that.)

Doing this test has also pushed me way over the edge on an issue that I've been waffling on: when I do loose shadow swatches from indie companies, from now on, I will do them both on bare skin and over Pixie Epoxy. I do the "two swipes, no primer" thing because I get so frustrated when people tell me that products are crap and then show me beautiful swatches. However, you're definitely missing the magic on products like this if you don't show them in their full glory.

The bottom line: if you're into loose eyeshadow, buy this, or something like it (e.g. Darling Girl's Glitter Glue is supposed to be a good alternative, although they're sold out every time I place an order!).

↧

Review: Sephora Cream Lip Stains in Endless Purple, Strawberry Kissed, and Classic Beige

December 24, 2013, 10:55 am

≫ Next: My New Favorite People Make Cheese Out of Human Body Odor-Producing Bacteria

≪ Previous: How Does Fyrinnae Pixie Epoxy Affect Your Loose Eyeshadows?

Sometimes, you just want to eat a Dagwood-style sandwich. Bread piled high with layers and layers of salami and ham in the middle. Other times, you want to eat home-fried tacos filled with there-is-no-such-thing-as-too-much-avocado, Cotija, and grilled chicken. Sometimes you want to eat a rack of lamb or a burger.

Sometimes, you want to eat those things and still have your lipstick on at the end of the meal. It's not particularly hard to make lipstick last through cereal or soup. Other meals, however, are a real challenge. The Sephora Cream Lip Stains are one of the products that I use when I want to eat a sloppy meal without making oodles of post-dinner touch-ups.

I have three of the four matte shades. (I skipped Always Red because, in a brief moment of honesty with myself, I admitted that I probably didn't actually need another classic blue-based red in my collection. The others were totally necessities, though. Yup.) I have never tried the satin-finishes or shimmery ones, so I can't comment on their formula or longevity.

Although they are being billed as a "lip stain", I feel like that is a slightly misleading characterization. They don't actually stain your lips-- they're just a thick, creamy liquid lipstick. These products have the same texture as slightly melted frosting or some whipped cream that you saved in a bowl in the fridge overnight--They're slightly more liquid than the NYX Matte Lip Creams and similar in texture to the Stila Stay All Day Liquid Lipsticks. All three products smell like store-bought vanilla frosting and dry to a lovely matte finish.

The Sephora Cream Lip Stains are madly opaque and very easy to work with whether you use the doe-foot applicator or your own lip brush.

Sephora Cream Lip Stain Swatches from left to right: Endless Purple, Strawberry Kissed, Classic Beige

Endless Purple is a plummy, dark mauve. Despite the name, it's not particularly purple.

Sephora Cream Lip Stain in Endless Purple on Human Face

Strawberry Kissed is my favorite of the three colors that I have tried. It's an electric pink-y red.

Sephora Cream Lip Stain in Strawberry Kissed on Human Face

Classic Beige is a light brown with pink undertones. It adds unconventional drama; This is a product that always makes me do a double-take when I go by a mirror. I like the fact that it looks like I'm in sepia when I wear it. Since it tones down one of the main sources of color on your face (your lips), it draws attention to anything that's not brown, such as an eye color or a cheek color. (And all without resorting to a nude lip!)

Sephora Cream Lip Stain in Classic Beige on Human Face

Of course, you need to know how these suckers last. Here's how Classic Beige fared on a "four hours and a meal" test:

Sephora Cream Lipstain in Classic Beige when applied.
(You know it's old if the pictures are vertical!)

Four hours and a meal later:

Sephora Cream Lipstain in Classic Beige Four Hours and a Meal after applying.

Like all long-lasting products, these lip creams are a little bit drying. However, I didn't find this issue to be particularly severe.

As would be expected from a Sephora-brand product, Sephora Cream Lip Stains are neither cheap nor expensive when looked at by the ounce, retailing for $13 for 0.169 oz ($76.92 per oz). For comparison, the NYX Matte Lip Creams come in at $6 for 0.23 oz ($26.09 per oz) and the Stila Stay All Day Liquid Lipsticks are $22 for 0.10 oz ($220 per oz).

↧

My New Favorite People Make Cheese Out of Human Body Odor-Producing Bacteria

December 27, 2013, 1:09 am

≫ Next: Review: Sleek Blush by 3 Palette in Pumpkin

≪ Previous: Review: Sephora Cream Lip Stains in Endless Purple, Strawberry Kissed, and Classic Beige

If there are three things I love in this world, it is cheese, science, and unprofitable-but-fascinating projects. Microbiologist Christina Agapakis and artist Sissel Tolaas decided to mush my interests together in a project called Selfmade. The pair created individual "portraits" of participants (the likes of whom included food writer Michael Pollan and installation artist Olafur Eliasson) by swabbing them and making cheese from their body's bacteria.

Formerly Michael Pollan's Bellybutton
Source: http://agapakis.com/selfmade.html

Generally, the first step in cheese production involves curdling the milk, separating it into solid curds and liquid whey. Bacteria from the Lactococcus genus, the Lactobacillus genus, and the Streptococcus genus are the most common starter bacteria for this process. These bacteria convert the sugars in the milk into lactic acid. When casein micelles, the bundled up globs of protein suspended in your milk, hit acid, the positive hydrogen atoms in the acid neutralize the negative casein proteins. Then, since nothing is repelling them from each other, they clump together, forming curds. Rennet, an enzyme complex produced by mammalian stomachs, is also usually used to help curdle the future-cheese. (Swiss cheese and other hole-filled cheeses also get an extra dose of Propionibacterium freudenreichii, which produces buttloads of carbon dioxide, giving Swiss its distinctive hole-y-ness.) For some cheeses (e.g. a fresh, soft goat cheese), that's all the needs to happen. Boom. Packaging time. Most, though, require further processing. Harder cheeses are heated to force out more of the soggy whey. Cheeses like mozzarella are stretched in hot water to help develop their melty, stringy quality. Cheddar goes through a process called, creatively enough, cheddaring. Lower-acid cheeses, like Gouda, are washed. Additionally, salt is added... because it is delicious. Many (most) cheeses are then ripened, turning from bland to complex as the casein proteins break down into amino acids, fatty acids, and amines. For some cheese, additional bacteria and molds will be added at this stage. For example, Brevibacterium linens, found on cheeses like Munster and Limburger, adds a uniquely orange hue. Blue cheeses are formed from exposure to fungi like Penicillium roqueforti or Penicillium glaucum.

Many of these microorganisms are ubiquitous on human skin. If you're not a biology nerd, but some of these genus and species names sound familiar, you might be remembering them from my deodorant post in September, where I talked about what bacteria are responsible for your stinkiness. (You can find it by clicking here.)

Lactococcus has been isolated on human skin in small quantities and there is evidence that it may serve an antimicrobial (well, anti-other-microbial) function. You're pretty much coated in Lactobacillus-- you can find it hanging out not only in small quantities on your skin, but in your gastrointestinal tract, in your tooth decay, and inside your vagina. (You can also thank Lactobacillus for yogurt and pickles.) Streptococcus is similarly abundant on your body. In addition to your skin, it can be found in your mouth, intestines, and respiratory system. Brevibacterium linens is one of the bacteria responsible for foot odor.

As cheese microbiologist Benjamin Wolfe says, "There's been really great recent work on the microbiome of people's feet, looking at both the bacteria and the fungi... and if you look at that data and you put our cheese data right next to it, they look pretty much the same."

In total, Agapakis and Tolaas made 11 cheeses, taking swabs from everything from mouths to belly buttons to feet. This formed the bacterial basis for their cheeses. Agapakis told NPR, "The idea was to recognize, how do we get grossed out? Then to think about it and move beyond that initial idea of disgust. Why are we more uncomfortable with bacteria on the body than we are with bacteria in cheese?"

Interviews suggest that no one has actually tasted the cheese, which is a disappointment. But, like... you first.

The project is currently on display at the Science Gallery in Dublin.

Aching for more information? Check out Christina Agapakis's website here and here...

...this short video:

...or this Science Gallery promotional video:

↧

Review: Sleek Blush by 3 Palette in Pumpkin

December 28, 2013, 12:37 am

≫ Next: The FDA Rolls Its Eyes with Exasperation at Triclosan in Anti-Bacterial Products

≪ Previous: My New Favorite People Make Cheese Out of Human Body Odor-Producing Bacteria

For me, blush palettes are absolutely wiggle-inducing. An array of colors with depth and options always offers more excitement than a single streak of pink shimmer.

The Sleek Blush by 3 Palettes are packaged in a basic black compact with a fatty mirror inside. It feels sturdy and the lid isn't floppy, meaning that you can open it to any angle you like and the compact will stay.

As a side note, I literally do not have the foggiest idea how to own makeup in black packaging without drowning it in smudges. (Is such a thing possible?)

Pumpkin is one of the more radical color combinations that Sleek offers, containing three dark, pigmented shades:

Lantern is an warm red with a finish that falls somewhere in between a satin and a shimmer. At times, it looks like a dark pink. Other times, it has a more orange-y hue.

Squash is a vivid, matte pink.

P Pie is a vibrant, matte orange that is reminiscent of traffic cones. I wish I could put into words how deeply my soul wishes that they had called the shade "pie" instead of "P Pie"-- we understand, Sleek! We don't need the clarifying 'P'! The palette is called "Pumpkin"! We get it! We understand how themes work!

All three shades are pigmented to the point of ludicrousness. I know that there are many people who always view pigmentation as a positive. I am not one of those people. There is a reason we don't formulate opaque blushes and it's not because formulating opaque blushes is more difficult than formulating opaque eyeshadow-- it's because no one wants to look like a clown college dropout.

If you apply with a light-as-fuck hand, these will still work admirably on fair skin, although they're trickier than other, user-friendly blushes. On dark skin, these will be gorgeous right out of the pan.

Sleek Pumpkin Swatches

Here's how these blushes look on my face:

If you can keep it toned down enough, 'lantern' is a great blush for a natural-looking flush.

Lantern on Human Face

Squash is probably the least special of the three blushes. It looks perfectly lovely.

Squash on Human Face

P Pie is my favorite of the lot. The vibrant orange comes across, but it still looks wearable.

P Pie on Human Face

The Sleek Blush By 3 Palettes retail for $12.49 for 0.68oz, or $18.37 per ounce. For comparison, the Wet'n'Wild Color Icon blushes, at $2.99 for 0.14oz, come in at a more expensive $21.36 per ounce. You would have to have absurd dedication to actually use up this blush palette because it is so damn gigantic. Based on my "How Many Application Are In a Pan of Blush" post from July, which found that I used a mean of 0.014g of blush per use, there is something like 1429 uses in this palette. At one blush application per day, this would take almost four years to finish off. In other words, you'll drop it and shatter it, leave it at the airport, or, even more likely, get bored with it long before you use the last hint of blush powder.

↧